10,108 research outputs found

    Bayesian Model Comparison in Genetic Association Analysis: Linear Mixed Modeling and SNP Set Testing

    Full text link
    We consider the problems of hypothesis testing and model comparison under a flexible Bayesian linear regression model whose formulation is closely connected with the linear mixed effect model and the parametric models for SNP set analysis in genetic association studies. We derive a class of analytic approximate Bayes factors and illustrate their connections with a variety of frequentist test statistics, including the Wald statistic and the variance component score statistic. Taking advantage of Bayesian model averaging and hierarchical modeling, we demonstrate some distinct advantages and flexibilities in the approaches utilizing the derived Bayes factors in the context of genetic association studies. We demonstrate our proposed methods using real or simulated numerical examples in applications of single SNP association testing, multi-locus fine-mapping and SNP set association testing

    A Strategy analysis for genetic association studies with known inbreeding

    Get PDF
    Background: Association studies consist in identifying the genetic variants which are related to a specific disease through the use of statistical multiple hypothesis testing or segregation analysis in pedigrees. This type of studies has been very successful in the case of Mendelian monogenic disorders while it has been less successful in identifying genetic variants related to complex diseases where the insurgence depends on the interactions between different genes and the environment. The current technology allows to genotype more than a million of markers and this number has been rapidly increasing in the last years with the imputation based on templates sets and whole genome sequencing. This type of data introduces a great amount of noise in the statistical analysis and usually requires a great number of samples. Current methods seldom take into account gene-gene and gene-environment interactions which are fundamental especially in complex diseases. In this paper we propose to use a non-parametric additive model to detect the genetic variants related to diseases which accounts for interactions of unknown order. Although this is not new to the current literature, we show that in an isolated population, where the most related subjects share also most of their genetic code, the use of additive models may be improved if the available genealogical tree is taken into account. Specifically, we form a sample of cases and controls with the highest inbreeding by means of the Hungarian method, and estimate the set of genes/environmental variables, associated with the disease, by means of Random Forest. Results: We have evidence, from statistical theory, simulations and two applications, that we build a suitable procedure to eliminate stratification between cases and controls and that it also has enough precision in identifying genetic variants responsible for a disease. This procedure has been successfully used for the betathalassemia, which is a well known Mendelian disease, and also to the common asthma where we have identified candidate genes that underlie to the susceptibility of the asthma. Some of such candidate genes have been also found related to common asthma in the current literature. Conclusions: The data analysis approach, based on selecting the most related cases and controls along with the Random Forest model, is a powerful tool for detecting genetic variants associated to a disease in isolated populations. Moreover, this method provides also a prediction model that has accuracy in estimating the unknown disease status and that can be generally used to build kit tests for a wide class of Mendelian diseases

    Neuregulin signaling pathway in smoking behavior

    Get PDF

    Statistical Methods For Detecting Genetic Risk Factors of a Disease with Applications to Genome-Wide Association Studies

    Get PDF
    This thesis aims to develop various statistical methods for analysing the data derived from genome wide association studies (GWAS). The GWAS often involves genotyping individual human genetic variation, using high-throughput genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, in thousands of individuals and testing for association between those variants and a given disease under the assumption of common disease/common variant. Although GWAS have identified many potential genetic factors in the genome that affect the risks to complex diseases, there is still much of the genetic heritability that remains unexplained. The power of detecting new genetic risk variants can be improved by considering multiple genetic variants simultaneously with novel statistical methods. Improving the analysis of the GWAS data has received much attention from statisticians and other scientific researchers over the past decade. There are several challenges arising in analysing the GWAS data. First, determining the risk SNPs might be difficult due to non-random correlation between SNPs that can inflate type I and II errors in statistical inference. When a group of SNPs are considered together in the context of haplotypes/genotypes, the distribution of the haplotypes/genotypes is sparse, which makes it difficult to detect risk haplotypes/genotypes in terms of disease penetrance. In this work, we proposed four new methods to identify risk haplotypes/genotypes based on their frequency differences between cases and controls. To evaluate the performances of our methods, we simulated datasets under wide range of scenarios according to both retrospective and prospective designs. In the first method, we first reconstruct haplotypes by using unphased genotypes, followed by clustering and thresholding the inferred haplotypes into risk and non-risk groups with a two-component binomial-mixture model. In the method, the parameters were estimated by using the modified Expectation-Maximization algorithm, where the maximisation step was replaced the posterior sampling of the component parameters. We also elucidated the relationships between risk and non-risk haplotypes under different modes of inheritance and genotypic relative risk. In the second method, we fitted a three-component mixture model to genotype data directly, followed by an odds-ratio thresholding. In the third method, we combined the existing haplotype reconstruction software PHASE and permutation method to infer risk haplotypes. In the fourth method, we proposed a new way to score the genotypes by clustering and combined it with a logistic regression approach to infer risk haplotypes. The simulation studies showed that the first three methods outperformed the multiple testing method of (Zhu, 2010) in terms of average specificity and sensitivity (AVSS) in all scenarios considered. The logistic regression methods also outperformed the standard logistic regression method. We applied our methods to two GWAS datasets on coronary artery disease (CAD) and hypertension (HT), detecting several new risk haplotypes and recovering a number of the existing disease-associated genetic variants in the literature

    Methodological Issues in Multistage Genome-Wide Association Studies

    Full text link
    Because of the high cost of commercial genotyping chip technologies, many investigations have used a two-stage design for genome-wide association studies, using part of the sample for an initial discovery of ``promising'' SNPs at a less stringent significance level and the remainder in a joint analysis of just these SNPs using custom genotyping. Typical cost savings of about 50% are possible with this design to obtain comparable levels of overall type I error and power by using about half the sample for stage I and carrying about 0.1% of SNPs forward to the second stage, the optimal design depending primarily upon the ratio of costs per genotype for stages I and II. However, with the rapidly declining costs of the commercial panels, the generally low observed ORs of current studies, and many studies aiming to test multiple hypotheses and multiple endpoints, many investigators are abandoning the two-stage design in favor of simply genotyping all available subjects using a standard high-density panel. Concern is sometimes raised about the absence of a ``replication'' panel in this approach, as required by some high-profile journals, but it must be appreciated that the two-stage design is not a discovery/replication design but simply a more efficient design for discovery using a joint analysis of the data from both stages. Once a subset of highly-significant associations has been discovered, a truly independent ``exact replication'' study is needed in a similar population of the same promising SNPs using similar methods.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/09-STS288 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

    Particle algorithms for optimization on binary spaces

    Full text link
    We discuss a unified approach to stochastic optimization of pseudo-Boolean objective functions based on particle methods, including the cross-entropy method and simulated annealing as special cases. We point out the need for auxiliary sampling distributions, that is parametric families on binary spaces, which are able to reproduce complex dependency structures, and illustrate their usefulness in our numerical experiments. We provide numerical evidence that particle-driven optimization algorithms based on parametric families yield superior results on strongly multi-modal optimization problems while local search heuristics outperform them on easier problems
    corecore