Alternating-Direction Line-Relaxation Methods on Multicomputers

We study the multicom.puter performance of a three-dimensional Navier–Stokes solver based on alternating-direction line-relaxation methods. We compare several multicomputer implementations, each of which combines a particular line-relaxation method and a particular distributed block-tridiagonal solver. In our experiments, the problem size was determined by resolution requirements of the application. As a result, the granularity of the computations of our study is finer than is customary in the performance analysis of concurrent block-tridiagonal solvers. Our best results were obtained with a modified half-Gauss–Seidel line-relaxation method implemented by means of a new iterative block-tridiagonal solver that is developed here. Most computations were performed on the Intel Touchstone Delta, but we also used the Intel Paragon XP/S, the Parsytec SC-256, and the Fujitsu S-600 for comparison

Matrix-free GPU implementation of a preconditioned conjugate gradient solver for anisotropic elliptic PDEs

Many problems in geophysical and atmospheric modelling require the fast solution of elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) in "flat" three dimensional geometries. In particular, an anisotropic elliptic PDE for the pressure correction has to be solved at every time step in the dynamical core of many numerical weather prediction models, and equations of a very similar structure arise in global ocean models, subsurface flow simulations and gas and oil reservoir modelling. The elliptic solve is often the bottleneck of the forecast, and an algorithmically optimal method has to be used and implemented efficiently. Graphics Processing Units have been shown to be highly efficient for a wide range of applications in scientific computing, and recently iterative solvers have been parallelised on these architectures. We describe the GPU implementation and optimisation of a Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient (PCG) algorithm for the solution of a three dimensional anisotropic elliptic PDE for the pressure correction in NWP. Our implementation exploits the strong vertical anisotropy of the elliptic operator in the construction of a suitable preconditioner. As the algorithm is memory bound, performance can be improved significantly by reducing the amount of global memory access. We achieve this by using a matrix-free implementation which does not require explicit storage of the matrix and instead recalculates the local stencil. Global memory access can also be reduced by rewriting the algorithm using loop fusion and we show that this further reduces the runtime on the GPU. We demonstrate the performance of our matrix-free GPU code by comparing it to a sequential CPU implementation and to a matrix-explicit GPU code which uses existing libraries. The absolute performance of the algorithm for different problem sizes is quantified in terms of floating point throughput and global memory bandwidth.Comment: 18 pages, 7 figure

Simulating the Behaviour of the Human Brain on NVIDIA GPU: cuHinesBatch & cuThomasBatch implementations

Understand the human brain is one of the century challenges. On this work we are going to achieve a small step towards this objective presenting a novel data layout in order to compute more efficiently the Hines algorithm on GPU. A more general tridiagonal solver is going to be presented too

Some fast elliptic solvers on parallel architectures and their complexities

The discretization of separable elliptic partial differential equations leads to linear systems with special block triangular matrices. Several methods are known to solve these systems, the most general of which is the Block Cyclic Reduction (BCR) algorithm which handles equations with nonconsistant coefficients. A method was recently proposed to parallelize and vectorize BCR. Here, the mapping of BCR on distributed memory architectures is discussed, and its complexity is compared with that of other approaches, including the Alternating-Direction method. A fast parallel solver is also described, based on an explicit formula for the solution, which has parallel computational complexity lower than that of parallel BCR

A Three-Level Parallelisation Scheme and Application to the Nelder-Mead Algorithm

We consider a three-level parallelisation scheme. The second and third levels define a classical two-level parallelisation scheme and some load balancing algorithm is used to distribute tasks among processes. It is well-known that for many applications the efficiency of parallel algorithms of the second and third level starts to drop down after some critical parallelisation degree is reached. This weakness of the two-level template is addressed by introduction of one additional parallelisation level. As an alternative to the basic solver some new or modified algorithms are considered on this level. The idea of the proposed methodology is to increase the parallelisation degree by using less efficient algorithms in comparison with the basic solver. As an example we investigate two modified Nelder-Mead methods. For the selected application, a few partial differential equations are solved numerically on the second level, and on the third level the parallel Wang's algorithm is used to solve systems of linear equations with tridiagonal matrices. A greedy workload balancing heuristic is proposed, which is oriented to the case of a large number of available processors. The complexity estimates of the computational tasks are model-based, i.e. they use empirical computational data