411 research outputs found
Trees over Infinite Structures and Path Logics with Synchronization
We provide decidability and undecidability results on the model-checking
problem for infinite tree structures. These tree structures are built from
sequences of elements of infinite relational structures. More precisely, we
deal with the tree iteration of a relational structure M in the sense of
Shelah-Stupp. In contrast to classical results where model-checking is shown
decidable for MSO-logic, we show decidability of the tree model-checking
problem for logics that allow only path quantifiers and chain quantifiers
(where chains are subsets of paths), as they appear in branching time logics;
however, at the same time the tree is enriched by the equal-level relation
(which holds between vertices u, v if they are on the same tree level). We
separate cleanly the tree logic from the logic used for expressing properties
of the underlying structure M. We illustrate the scope of the decidability
results by showing that two slight extensions of the framework lead to
undecidability. In particular, this applies to the (stronger) tree iteration in
the sense of Muchnik-Walukiewicz.Comment: In Proceedings INFINITY 2011, arXiv:1111.267
Expansions of MSO by cardinality relations
We study expansions of the Weak Monadic Second Order theory of (N,<) by
cardinality relations, which are predicates R(X1,...,Xn) whose truth value
depends only on the cardinality of the sets X1, ...,Xn. We first provide a
(definable) criterion for definability of a cardinality relation in (N,<), and
use it to prove that for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in
(N,<), there exists a unary cardinality relation which is definable in (N,<,R)
and not in (N,<). These results resemble Muchnik and Michaux-Villemaire
theorems for Presburger Arithmetic. We prove then that + and x are definable in
(N,<,R) for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in (N,<). This
implies undecidability of the WMSO theory of (N,<,R). We also consider the
related satisfiability problem for the class of finite orderings, namely the
question whether an MSO sentence in the language {<,R} admits a finite model M
where < is interpreted as a linear ordering, and R as the restriction of some
(fixed) cardinality relation to the domain of M. We prove that this problem is
undecidable for every cardinality relation R which is not definable in (N,<).Comment: to appear in LMC
Infinite and Bi-infinite Words with Decidable Monadic Theories
We study word structures of the form where is either
or , is the natural linear ordering on and
is a predicate on . In particular we show:
(a) The set of recursive -words with decidable monadic second order
theories is -complete.
(b) Known characterisations of the -words with decidable monadic
second order theories are transfered to the corresponding question for
bi-infinite words.
(c) We show that such "tame" predicates exist in every Turing degree.
(d) We determine, for , the number of predicates
such that and
are indistinguishable.
Through these results we demonstrate similarities and differences between
logical properties of infinite and bi-infinite words
Model Checking Synchronized Products of Infinite Transition Systems
Formal verification using the model checking paradigm has to deal with two
aspects: The system models are structured, often as products of components, and
the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization
of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what can be
achieved for infinite transition systems under these premises. As models we
consider products of infinite transition systems with different synchronization
constraints. We introduce finitely synchronized transition systems, i.e.
product systems which contain only finitely many (parameterized) synchronized
transitions, and show that the decidability of FO(R), first-order logic
extended by reachability predicates, of the product system can be reduced to
the decidability of FO(R) of the components. This result is optimal in the
following sense: (1) If we allow semifinite synchronization, i.e. just in one
component infinitely many transitions are synchronized, the FO(R)-theory of the
product system is in general undecidable. (2) We cannot extend the expressive
power of the logic under consideration. Already a weak extension of first-order
logic with transitive closure, where we restrict the transitive closure
operators to arity one and nesting depth two, is undecidable for an
asynchronous (and hence finitely synchronized) product, namely for the infinite
grid.Comment: 18 page
The First-Order Theory of Sets with Cardinality Constraints is Decidable
We show that the decidability of the first-order theory of the language that
combines Boolean algebras of sets of uninterpreted elements with Presburger
arithmetic operations. We thereby disprove a recent conjecture that this theory
is undecidable. Our language allows relating the cardinalities of sets to the
values of integer variables, and can distinguish finite and infinite sets. We
use quantifier elimination to show the decidability and obtain an elementary
upper bound on the complexity.
Precise program analyses can use our decidability result to verify
representation invariants of data structures that use an integer field to
represent the number of stored elements.Comment: 18 page
Decidability vs. undecidability. Logico-philosophico-historical remarks
The aim of the paper is to present the decidability problems from a philosophical and historical perspective as well as to indicate basic mathematical and logical results concerning (un)decidability of particular theories and problems
Decidability of Difference Logic over the Reals with Uninterpreted Unary Predicates
First-order logic fragments mixing quantifiers, arithmetic, and uninterpreted
predicates are often undecidable, as is, for instance, Presburger arithmetic
extended with a single uninterpreted unary predicate. In the SMT world,
difference logic is a quite popular fragment of linear arithmetic which is less
expressive than Presburger arithmetic. Difference logic on integers with
uninterpreted unary predicates is known to be decidable, even in the presence
of quantifiers. We here show that (quantified) difference logic on real numbers
with a single uninterpreted unary predicate is undecidable, quite surprisingly.
Moreover, we prove that difference logic on integers, together with order on
reals, combined with uninterpreted unary predicates, remains decidable.Comment: This is the preprint for the submission published in CADE-29. It also
includes an additional detailed proof in the appendix. The Version of Record
of this contribution will be published in CADE-2
Changing a semantics: opportunism or courage?
The generalized models for higher-order logics introduced by Leon Henkin, and
their multiple offspring over the years, have become a standard tool in many
areas of logic. Even so, discussion has persisted about their technical status,
and perhaps even their conceptual legitimacy. This paper gives a systematic
view of generalized model techniques, discusses what they mean in mathematical
and philosophical terms, and presents a few technical themes and results about
their role in algebraic representation, calibrating provability, lowering
complexity, understanding fixed-point logics, and achieving set-theoretic
absoluteness. We also show how thinking about Henkin's approach to semantics of
logical systems in this generality can yield new results, dispelling the
impression of adhocness. This paper is dedicated to Leon Henkin, a deep
logician who has changed the way we all work, while also being an always open,
modest, and encouraging colleague and friend.Comment: 27 pages. To appear in: The life and work of Leon Henkin: Essays on
his contributions (Studies in Universal Logic) eds: Manzano, M., Sain, I. and
Alonso, E., 201
- …