177,958 research outputs found
Variability and Evolution in Systems of Systems
In this position paper (1) we discuss two particular aspects of Systems of
Systems, i.e., variability and evolution. (2) We argue that concepts from
Product Line Engineering and Software Evolution are relevant to Systems of
Systems Engineering. (3) Conversely, concepts from Systems of Systems
Engineering can be helpful in Product Line Engineering and Software Evolution.
Hence, we argue that an exchange of concepts between the disciplines would be
beneficial.Comment: In Proceedings AiSoS 2013, arXiv:1311.319
We Don't Need Another Hero? The Impact of "Heroes" on Software Development
A software project has "Hero Developers" when 80% of contributions are
delivered by 20% of the developers. Are such heroes a good idea? Are too many
heroes bad for software quality? Is it better to have more/less heroes for
different kinds of projects? To answer these questions, we studied 661 open
source projects from Public open source software (OSS) Github and 171 projects
from an Enterprise Github.
We find that hero projects are very common. In fact, as projects grow in
size, nearly all project become hero projects. These findings motivated us to
look more closely at the effects of heroes on software development. Analysis
shows that the frequency to close issues and bugs are not significantly
affected by the presence of project type (Public or Enterprise). Similarly, the
time needed to resolve an issue/bug/enhancement is not affected by heroes or
project type. This is a surprising result since, before looking at the data, we
expected that increasing heroes on a project will slow down howfast that
project reacts to change. However, we do find a statistically significant
association between heroes, project types, and enhancement resolution rates.
Heroes do not affect enhancement resolution rates in Public projects. However,
in Enterprise projects, the more heroes increase the rate at which project
complete enhancements.
In summary, our empirical results call for a revision of a long-held truism
in software engineering. Software heroes are far more common and valuable than
suggested by the literature, particularly for medium to large Enterprise
developments. Organizations should reflect on better ways to find and retain
more of these heroesComment: 8 pages + 1 references, Accepted to International conference on
Software Engineering - Software Engineering in Practice, 201
User Review-Based Change File Localization for Mobile Applications
In the current mobile app development, novel and emerging DevOps practices
(e.g., Continuous Delivery, Integration, and user feedback analysis) and tools
are becoming more widespread. For instance, the integration of user feedback
(provided in the form of user reviews) in the software release cycle represents
a valuable asset for the maintenance and evolution of mobile apps. To fully
make use of these assets, it is highly desirable for developers to establish
semantic links between the user reviews and the software artefacts to be
changed (e.g., source code and documentation), and thus to localize the
potential files to change for addressing the user feedback. In this paper, we
propose RISING (Review Integration via claSsification, clusterIng, and
linkiNG), an automated approach to support the continuous integration of user
feedback via classification, clustering, and linking of user reviews. RISING
leverages domain-specific constraint information and semi-supervised learning
to group user reviews into multiple fine-grained clusters concerning similar
users' requests. Then, by combining the textual information from both commit
messages and source code, it automatically localizes potential change files to
accommodate the users' requests. Our empirical studies demonstrate that the
proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline work in terms of
clustering and localization accuracy, and thus produces more reliable results.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, 8 table
Evaluating Software Architectures: Development Stability and Evolution
We survey seminal work on software architecture evaluationmethods. We then look at an emerging class of methodsthat explicates evaluating software architectures forstability and evolution. We define architectural stabilityand formulate the problem of evaluating software architecturesfor stability and evolution. We draw the attention onthe use of Architectures Description Languages (ADLs) forsupporting the evaluation of software architectures in generaland for architectural stability in specific
- …