6,566 research outputs found
Space complexity in polynomial calculus
During the last decade, an active line of research in proof complexity has been to study space
complexity and time-space trade-offs for proofs. Besides being a natural complexity measure of
intrinsic interest, space is also an important issue in SAT solving, and so research has mostly focused
on weak systems that are used by SAT solvers.
There has been a relatively long sequence of papers on space in resolution, which is now reasonably
well understood from this point of view. For other natural candidates to study, however, such as
polynomial calculus or cutting planes, very little has been known. We are not aware of any nontrivial
space lower bounds for cutting planes, and for polynomial calculus the only lower bound has been
for CNF formulas of unbounded width in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02], where the space lower bound is
smaller than the initial width of the clauses in the formulas. Thus, in particular, it has been consistent
with current knowledge that polynomial calculus could be able to refute any k-CNF formula in
constant space.
In this paper, we prove several new results on space in polynomial calculus (PC), and in the
extended proof system polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) studied in [Alekhnovich et al. ’02]:
1. We prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PC for the canonical 3-CNF version of the pigeonhole
principle formulas PHPm
n with m pigeons and n holes, and show that this is tight.
2. For PCR, we prove an Ω(n) space lower bound for a bitwise encoding of the functional pigeonhole
principle. These formulas have width O(log n), and hence this is an exponential
improvement over [Alekhnovich et al. ’02] measured in the width of the formulas.
3. We then present another encoding of the pigeonhole principle that has constant width, and
prove an Ω(n) space lower bound in PCR for these formulas as well.
4. Finally, we prove that any k-CNF formula can be refuted in PC in simultaneous exponential
size and linear space (which holds for resolution and thus for PCR, but was not obviously
the case for PC). We also characterize a natural class of CNF formulas for which the space
complexity in resolution and PCR does not change when the formula is transformed into 3-CNF
in the canonical way, something that we believe can be useful when proving PCR space lower
bounds for other well-studied formula families in proof complexity
Structured Learning of Tree Potentials in CRF for Image Segmentation
We propose a new approach to image segmentation, which exploits the
advantages of both conditional random fields (CRFs) and decision trees. In the
literature, the potential functions of CRFs are mostly defined as a linear
combination of some pre-defined parametric models, and then methods like
structured support vector machines (SSVMs) are applied to learn those linear
coefficients. We instead formulate the unary and pairwise potentials as
nonparametric forests---ensembles of decision trees, and learn the ensemble
parameters and the trees in a unified optimization problem within the
large-margin framework. In this fashion, we easily achieve nonlinear learning
of potential functions on both unary and pairwise terms in CRFs. Moreover, we
learn class-wise decision trees for each object that appears in the image. Due
to the rich structure and flexibility of decision trees, our approach is
powerful in modelling complex data likelihoods and label relationships. The
resulting optimization problem is very challenging because it can have
exponentially many variables and constraints. We show that this challenging
optimization can be efficiently solved by combining a modified column
generation and cutting-planes techniques. Experimental results on both binary
(Graz-02, Weizmann horse, Oxford flower) and multi-class (MSRC-21, PASCAL VOC
2012) segmentation datasets demonstrate the power of the learned nonlinear
nonparametric potentials.Comment: 10 pages. Appearing in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and
Learning System
The Many Moods of Emotion
This paper presents a novel approach to the facial expression generation
problem. Building upon the assumption of the psychological community that
emotion is intrinsically continuous, we first design our own continuous emotion
representation with a 3-dimensional latent space issued from a neural network
trained on discrete emotion classification. The so-obtained representation can
be used to annotate large in the wild datasets and later used to trained a
Generative Adversarial Network. We first show that our model is able to map
back to discrete emotion classes with a objectively and subjectively better
quality of the images than usual discrete approaches. But also that we are able
to pave the larger space of possible facial expressions, generating the many
moods of emotion. Moreover, two axis in this space may be found to generate
similar expression changes as in traditional continuous representations such as
arousal-valence. Finally we show from visual interpretation, that the third
remaining dimension is highly related to the well-known dominance dimension
from psychology
On the Power and Limitations of Branch and Cut
The Stabbing Planes proof system [Paul Beame et al., 2018] was introduced to model the reasoning carried out in practical mixed integer programming solvers. As a proof system, it is powerful enough to simulate Cutting Planes and to refute the Tseitin formulas - certain unsatisfiable systems of linear equations od 2 - which are canonical hard examples for many algebraic proof systems. In a recent (and surprising) result, Dadush and Tiwari [Daniel Dadush and Samarth Tiwari, 2020] showed that these short refutations of the Tseitin formulas could be translated into quasi-polynomial size and depth Cutting Planes proofs, refuting a long-standing conjecture. This translation raises several interesting questions. First, whether all Stabbing Planes proofs can be efficiently simulated by Cutting Planes. This would allow for the substantial analysis done on the Cutting Planes system to be lifted to practical mixed integer programming solvers. Second, whether the quasi-polynomial depth of these proofs is inherent to Cutting Planes.
In this paper we make progress towards answering both of these questions. First, we show that any Stabbing Planes proof with bounded coefficients (SP*) can be translated into Cutting Planes. As a consequence of the known lower bounds for Cutting Planes, this establishes the first exponential lower bounds on SP*. Using this translation, we extend the result of Dadush and Tiwari to show that Cutting Planes has short refutations of any unsatisfiable system of linear equations over a finite field. Like the Cutting Planes proofs of Dadush and Tiwari, our refutations also incur a quasi-polynomial blow-up in depth, and we conjecture that this is inherent. As a step towards this conjecture, we develop a new geometric technique for proving lower bounds on the depth of Cutting Planes proofs. This allows us to establish the first lower bounds on the depth of Semantic Cutting Planes proofs of the Tseitin formulas
Understanding Cutting Planes for QBFs
We define a cutting planes system CP+8red for quantified Boolean formulas (QBF) and analyse the proof-theoretic strength of this new calculus. While in the propositional case, Cutting Planes is of intermediate strength between resolution and Frege, our findings here show that the situation in QBF is slightly more complex: while CP+8red is again weaker than QBF Frege and stronger than the CDCL-based QBF resolution systems Q-Res and QU-Res, it turns out to be incomparable to even the weakest expansion-based QBF resolution system 8Exp+Res. Technically, our results establish the effectiveness of two lower boun
- …