58,401 research outputs found
Distributed Approximation Algorithms for Weighted Shortest Paths
A distributed network is modeled by a graph having nodes (processors) and
diameter . We study the time complexity of approximating {\em weighted}
(undirected) shortest paths on distributed networks with a {\em
bandwidth restriction} on edges (the standard synchronous \congest model). The
question whether approximation algorithms help speed up the shortest paths
(more precisely distance computation) was raised since at least 2004 by Elkin
(SIGACT News 2004). The unweighted case of this problem is well-understood
while its weighted counterpart is fundamental problem in the area of
distributed approximation algorithms and remains widely open. We present new
algorithms for computing both single-source shortest paths (\sssp) and
all-pairs shortest paths (\apsp) in the weighted case.
Our main result is an algorithm for \sssp. Previous results are the classic
-time Bellman-Ford algorithm and an -time
-approximation algorithm, for any integer
, which follows from the result of Lenzen and Patt-Shamir (STOC 2013).
(Note that Lenzen and Patt-Shamir in fact solve a harder problem, and we use
to hide the O(\poly\log n) term.) We present an -time -approximation algorithm for \sssp. This
algorithm is {\em sublinear-time} as long as is sublinear, thus yielding a
sublinear-time algorithm with almost optimal solution. When is small, our
running time matches the lower bound of by Das Sarma
et al. (SICOMP 2012), which holds even when , up to a
\poly\log n factor.Comment: Full version of STOC 201
Distributed Exact Shortest Paths in Sublinear Time
The distributed single-source shortest paths problem is one of the most
fundamental and central problems in the message-passing distributed computing.
Classical Bellman-Ford algorithm solves it in time, where is the
number of vertices in the input graph . Peleg and Rubinovich (FOCS'99)
showed a lower bound of for this problem, where
is the hop-diameter of .
Whether or not this problem can be solved in time when is
relatively small is a major notorious open question. Despite intensive research
\cite{LP13,N14,HKN15,EN16,BKKL16} that yielded near-optimal algorithms for the
approximate variant of this problem, no progress was reported for the original
problem.
In this paper we answer this question in the affirmative. We devise an
algorithm that requires time, for , and time, for larger . This
running time is sublinear in in almost the entire range of parameters,
specifically, for . For the all-pairs shortest paths
problem, our algorithm requires time, regardless of
the value of .
We also devise the first algorithm with non-trivial complexity guarantees for
computing exact shortest paths in the multipass semi-streaming model of
computation.
From the technical viewpoint, our algorithm computes a hopset of a
skeleton graph of without first computing itself. We then conduct
a Bellman-Ford exploration in , while computing the required edges
of on the fly. As a result, our algorithm computes exactly those edges of
that it really needs, rather than computing approximately the entire
The Complexity of Rerouting Shortest Paths
The Shortest Path Reconfiguration problem has as input a graph G (with unit
edge lengths) with vertices s and t, and two shortest st-paths P and Q. The
question is whether there exists a sequence of shortest st-paths that starts
with P and ends with Q, such that subsequent paths differ in only one vertex.
This is called a rerouting sequence.
This problem is shown to be PSPACE-complete. For claw-free graphs and chordal
graphs, it is shown that the problem can be solved in polynomial time, and that
shortest rerouting sequences have linear length. For these classes, it is also
shown that deciding whether a rerouting sequence exists between all pairs of
shortest st-paths can be done in polynomial time. Finally, a polynomial time
algorithm for counting the number of isolated paths is given.Comment: The results on claw-free graphs, chordal graphs and isolated paths
have been added in version 2 (april 2012). Version 1 (September 2010) only
contained the PSPACE-hardness result. (Version 2 has been submitted.
- …