5,159 research outputs found

    FPGA implementation of reconfigurable ADPLL network for distributed clock generation

    Get PDF
    International audienceThis paper presents an FPGA platform for the design and study of network of coupled All-Digital Phase Locked Loops (ADPLLs), destined for clock generation in large synchronous System on Chip (SoC). An implementation of a programmable and reconfigurable 4×4 ADPLL network is described. The paper emphasizes the difference between the FPGA and ASIC-based implementation of such a system, in particular, implementation of digitally controlled oscillators and phase-frequency detector. The FPGA-implemented network allows studying complex phenomena related to coupled ADPLL operation and exploiting stability issues and nonlinear behavior. A dynamic setup mechanism has been proposed for the network, allowing selecting the desirable synchronized state. Experimental results demonstrate the global synchronization of network and performance of the network for different configurations

    최적 위상 검출 회로를 이용한 클럭 및 데이터 복원 회로에 관한 연구

    Get PDF
    학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 전기·컴퓨터공학부, 2014. 8. 김재하.Bang-bang phase detectors are widely used for today's high-speed communication circuits such as phase-locked loops (PLLs), delay-locked loops (DLLs) and clock-and-data recovery loops (CDRs) because it is simple, fast, accurate and amenable to digital implementations. However, its hard nonlinearity poses difficulties in design and analyses of the bang-bang controlled timing loops. Especially, dithering in bang-bang controlled CDRs sets conflicting requirements on the phase adjustment resolution as one tries to maximize the tracking bandwidth and minimize jitter. A fine phase step is helpful to minimize the dithering, but it requires circuits with finer resolution that consumes large power and area. In this background, this dissertation introduces an optimal phase detection technique that can minimize the effect of dithering without requiring fine phase resolution. A novel phase interval detector that looks for a phase interval enclosing the desired lock point is shown to find the optimal phase that minimizes the timing error without dithering. A digitally-controlled, phase-interpolating DLL-based CDR fabricated in 65nm CMOS demonstrates that it can achieve small area of 0.026mm^2 and low jitter of 41mUIp-p with a coarse phase adjustment step of 0.11UI, while dissipating only 8.4mW at 5Gbps. For the theoretic basis, various analysis techniques to understand bang-bang controlled timing loops are also presented. The proposed techniques are explained for both linearized loop and non-linear one, and applied to the evaluation of the proposed phase detection technique.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Thesis Contribution and Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 Pseudo-Linear Analysis of Bang-Bang Controlled Loops 9 2.1 Model of a Second-Order, Bang-Bang Controlled Timing Loop . . . 9 2.2 Necessary Condition for the Pseudo-Linear Analysis . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3 Derivation of Necessity Condition for the Pseudo-Linear Analysis . . 17 2.4 A Linearized Model of the Bang-Bang Phase Detector . . . . . . . . 18 2.5 Linearized Gain of a Bang-Bang Phase Detector for Jitter Transfer and Jitter Generation Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.6 Jitter Transfer and Jitter Generation Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.7 Linearized Gains of a Bang-bang Phase Detector for Jitter Tolerance Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.8 Jitter Tolerance Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3 Nonlinear Analysis of Bang-Bang Controlled Loops 48 3.1 Transient Analysis of Bang-Bang Controlled Timing Loops . . . . . 48 3.2 Phase-portrait Analysis of Bang-Bang Controlled Timing Loops . . . 51 3.3 Markov-chain Analysis of Bang-Bang Controlled Timing Loops . . . 53 3.4 Analysis of Clock-and-Data Recovery Circuits . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.4.1 Prediction of Bit-Error Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.4.2 Eect of Transition Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 3.4.3 Eect of Decimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.4.4 Analysis of Oversampling Phase Detectors . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4 Design of Ditherless Clock and Data Recovery Circuit 75 4.1 Optimal Phase Detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 4.2 Proposed Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 4.3 Analysis of the CDR with Phase Interval Detection . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.4 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 4.4.1 Sampling Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 4.4.2 Phase Detector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 4.4.3 Digital Loop Filter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 4.4.4 Phase Locked-Loop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 4.4.5 Phase Interpolator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 4.5 Built-In Self-Test Circuit for Jitter Tolerance Measurement . . . . . 102 4.6 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5 Conclusion 114 References 116Docto

    Steady-state probability density function of the phase error for a DPLL with an integrate-and-dump device

    Get PDF
    The steady-state behavior of a particular type of digital phase-locked loop (DPLL) with an integrate-and-dump circuit following the phase detector is characterized in terms of the probability density function (pdf) of the phase error in the loop. Although the loop is entirely digital from an implementation standpoint, it operates at two extremely different sampling rates. In particular, the combination of a phase detector and an integrate-and-dump circuit operates at a very high rate whereas the loop update rate is very slow by comparison. Because of this dichotomy, the loop can be analyzed by hybrid analog/digital (s/z domain) techniques. The loop is modeled in such a general fashion that previous analyses of the Real-Time Combiner (RTC), Subcarrier Demodulator Assembly (SDA), and Symbol Synchronization Assembly (SSA) fall out as special cases

    A short survey on nonlinear models of the classic Costas loop: rigorous derivation and limitations of the classic analysis

    Full text link
    Rigorous nonlinear analysis of the physical model of Costas loop --- a classic phase-locked loop (PLL) based circuit for carrier recovery, is a challenging task. Thus for its analysis, simplified mathematical models and numerical simulation are widely used. In this work a short survey on nonlinear models of the BPSK Costas loop, used for pre-design and post-design analysis, is presented. Their rigorous derivation and limitations of classic analysis are discussed. It is shown that the use of simplified mathematical models, and the application of non rigorous methods of analysis (e.g., simulation and linearization) may lead to wrong conclusions concerning the performance of the Costas loop physical model.Comment: Accepted to American Control Conference (ACC) 2015 (Chicago, USA
    corecore