Low Power Processor Architectures and Contemporary Techniques for Power Optimization – A Review

The technological evolution has increased the number of transistors for a given die area significantly and increased the switching speed from few MHz to GHz range. Such inversely proportional decline in size and boost in performance consequently demands shrinking of supply voltage and effective power dissipation in chips with millions of transistors. This has triggered substantial amount of research in power reduction techniques into almost every aspect of the chip and particularly the processor cores contained in the chip. This paper presents an overview of techniques for achieving the power efficiency mainly at the processor core level but also visits related domains such as buses and memories. There are various processor parameters and features such as supply voltage, clock frequency, cache and pipelining which can be optimized to reduce the power consumption of the processor. This paper discusses various ways in which these parameters can be optimized. Also, emerging power efficient processor architectures are overviewed and research activities are discussed which should help reader identify how these factors in a processor contribute to power consumption. Some of these concepts have been already established whereas others are still active research areas. © 2009 ACADEMY PUBLISHER

Accelerator Memory Reuse in the Dark Silicon Era

Accelerators integrated on-die with General-Purpose CPUs (GP-CPUs) can yield significant performance and power improvements. Their extensive use, however, is ultimately limited by their area overhead; due to their high degree of specialization, the opportunity cost of investing die real estate on accelerators can become prohibitive, especially for general-purpose architectures. In this paper we present a novel technique aimed at mitigating this opportunity cost by allowing GP-CPU cores to reuse accelerator memory as a non-uniform cache architecture (NUCA) substrate. On a system with a last level-2 cache of 128kB, our technique achieves on average a 25% performance improvement when reusing four 512 kB accelerator memory blocks to form a level-3 cache. Making these blocks reusable as NUCA slices incurs on average in a 1.89% area overhead with respect to equally-sized ad hoc cache slice

A Study on Performance and Power Efficiency of Dense Non-Volatile Caches in Multi-Core Systems

In this paper, we present a novel cache design based on Multi-Level Cell Spin-Transfer Torque RAM (MLC STTRAM) that can dynamically adapt the set capacity and associativity to use efficiently the full potential of MLC STTRAM. We exploit the asymmetric nature of the MLC storage scheme to build cache lines featuring heterogeneous performances, that is, half of the cache lines are read-friendly, while the other is write-friendly. Furthermore, we propose to opportunistically deactivate ways in underutilized sets to convert MLC to Single-Level Cell (SLC) mode, which features overall better performance and lifetime. Our ultimate goal is to build a cache architecture that combines the capacity advantages of MLC and performance/energy advantages of SLC. Our experiments show an improvement of 43% in total numbers of conflict misses, 27% in memory access latency, 12% in system performance, and 26% in LLC access energy, with a slight degradation in cache lifetime (about 7%) compared to an SLC cache

Cache Equalizer: A Cache Pressure Aware Block Placement Scheme for Large-Scale Chip Multiprocessors

This paper describes Cache Equalizer (CE), a novel distributed cache management scheme for large scale chip multiprocessors (CMPs). Our work is motivated by large asymmetry in cache sets usages. CE decouples the physical locations of cache blocks from their addresses for the sake of reducing misses caused by destructive interferences. Temporal pressure at the on-chip last-level cache, is continuously collected at a group (comprised of cache sets) granularity, and periodically recorded at the memory controller to guide the placement process. An incoming block is consequently placed at a cache group that exhibits the minimum pressure. CE provides Quality of Service (QoS) by robustly offering better performance than the baseline shared NUCA cache. Simulation results using a full-system simulator demonstrate that CE outperforms shared NUCA caches by an average of 15.5% and by as much as 28.5% for the benchmark programs we examined. Furthermore, evaluations manifested the outperformance of CE versus related CMP cache designs

FOS: a low-power cache organization for multicores

[EN] The cache hierarchy of current multicore processors typically consists of one or two levels of private caches per core and a large shared last-level cache. This approach incurs area and energy wasting due to oversizing the private cache space, data replication through the inclusive cache levels, as well as the use of highly set-associative caches. In this paper, we claim that although this is the commonly adopted approach, it presents important design issues that can be addressed by a more energy efficient organization. This work proposes Flat On-chip Storage (FOS), a novel cache organization that, aimed at addressing energy and area on low-power processors, resolves the mentioned issues. For this purpose, FOS combines L2 and L3 cache levels into a single one, organized as a flat space, and composed of a pool of private small cache slices. These slices are initially powered off to save energy, and they are powered on and assigned to cores provided that the system performance is expected to improve. To provide fast and uniform access from the private L1 caches to the FOS's cache slices, multiple architectural challenges are overcome, which entails the design of a custom optical network-on-chip. Experimental results show that FOS achieves significant energy savings on both static and dynamic energy over conventional cache organizations with the same storage capacity. FOS static energy savings are as much as 60% over an electrically connected shared cache; these savings grow up to 75% compared to optically connected baselines. Moreover, despite deactivating part of the cache space, FOS achieves similar performance values as those achieved by conventional approaches.Puche-Lara, J.; Petit Martí, SV.; Sahuquillo Borrás, J.; Gómez Requena, ME. (2019). FOS: a low-power cache organization for multicores. The Journal of Supercomputing (Online). 75(10):6542-6573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-02858-xS654265737510Awasthi M, Sudan K, Balasubramonian R, Carter J (2009) Dynamic hardware-assisted software-controlled page placement to manage capacity allocation and sharing within large caches. In: 2009 IEEE 15th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, pp 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA.2009.4798260Baer J, Low D, Crowley P, Sidhwaney N (2003) Memory hierarchy design for a multiprocessor look-up engine. In: 12th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques (PACT 2003)Bahirat S, Pasricha S (2014) Meteor: hybrid photonic ring-mesh network-on-chip for multicore architectures. ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst 13(3s):116:1–116:33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567940Bartolini S, Grani P (2012) A simple on-chip optical interconnection for improving performance of coherency traffic in CMPS. In: 15th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, pp 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD.2012.13Beckmann BM, Marty MR, Wood DA (2006) ASR: adaptive selective replication for CMP caches. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, MICRO 39. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, pp 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRO.2006.10Beckmann N, Sanchez D (2013) Jigsaw: scalable software-defined caches. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, PACT ’13. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2013.6618818Bergman K, Carloni LP, Bibermani AC, Hendry G (2014) Photonic network-on-chip design, vol 68. Springer, New YorkChang J, Sohi GS (2006) Cooperative caching for chip multiprocessors. In: Proceedings 33rd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCA.2006.17Chen G, Chen H, Haurylau M, Nelson N, Fauchet PM, Friedman EG, Albonesi D (2005) Predictions of CMOS compatible on-chip optical interconnect. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction, SLIP ’05, pp 13–20Chishti Z, Powell MD, Vijaykumar TN (2005) Optimizing replication, communication, and capacity allocation in cmps. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 33(2):357–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/1080695.1070001Cho S, Jin L (2006) Managing distributed, shared l2 caches through os-level page allocation. In: 2006 39th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO’06), pp 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRO.2006.31Cianchetti MJ, Kerekes JC, Albonesi DH (2009) Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA’09, pp 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555754.1555809Demir Y, Hardavellas N (2015) Parka: thermally insulated nanophotonic interconnects. In: NOCS ’15, pp 1:1–1:8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2786572.2786597Duan GH, Fedeli JM, Keyvaninia S, Thomson D (2012) 10 gb/s integrated tunable hybrid iii-v/si laser and silicon mach-zehnder modulator. In: European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication. https://doi.org/10.1364/ECEOC.2012.Tu.4.E.2Dybdahl H, Stenstrom P (2007) An adaptive shared/private NUCA cache partitioning scheme for chip multiprocessors. In: 2007 IEEE 13th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, pp 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA.2007.346180García A, Fernández R, Garca JM, Bartolini S (2014) Managing resources dynamically in hybrid photonic-electronic networks-on-chip. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 26(15):2530–2550. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3332Hardavellas N, Ferdman M, Falsafi B, Ailamaki A (2009) Reactive NUCA: near-optimal block placement and replication in distributed caches. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 37(3):184–195. https://doi.org/10.1145/1555815.1555779Herrero E, González J, Canal R (2008) Distributed cooperative caching. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, PACT ’08, pp 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1145/1454115.1454136Herrero E, González J, Canal R (2010) Elastic cooperative caching: an autonomous dynamically adaptive memory hierarchy for chip multiprocessors. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA ’10, pp 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1145/1815961.1816018Huh J, Kim C, Shafi H, Zhang L, Burger D, Keckler SW (2005) A NUCA substrate for flexible CMP cache sharing. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Supercomputing, ICS ’05. ACM, pp 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1088149.1088154Kahng AB, Li B, Peh LS, Samadi K (2009) Orion 2.0: a fast and accurate NoC power and area model for early-stage design space exploration. In: DATE. European Design and Automation Association, pp 423–428Kaxiras S, Hu Z, Martonosi M (2001) Cache decay: exploiting generational behavior to reduce cache leakage power. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, ISCA’01, pp 240–251Kim S, Chandra D, Solihin D (2004) Fair cache sharing and partitioning in a chip multiprocessor architecture. In: PACT, pp 111–122Merino J, Puente V, Gregorio JA (2010) ESP-NUCA: a low-cost adaptive non-uniform cache architecture. In: HPCA-16 2010 the Sixteenth International Symposium on High-performance Computer Architecture, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA.2010.5416641Morris R, Kodi AK, Louri A (2012) Dynamic reconfiguration of 3d photonic networks-on-chip for maximizing performance and improving fault tolerance. In: 2012 45th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pp 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRO.2012.34Muralimanohar N, Balasubramonian R, Jouppi NP (2009) Cacti 6.0: a tool to model large caches. In: HP LaboratoriesPang J, Dwyer C, Lebeck AR (2013) Exploiting emerging technologies for nanoscale photonic networks-on-chip. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on NoC Architectures, NoCArc ’13, pp 53–58Petit S, Sahuquillo J, Such JM, Kaeli DR (2005) Exploiting temporal locality in drowsy cache policies. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Computing Frontiers, Ischia, Italy, 4–6 May 2005, pp 371–377Pons L, Selfa V, Sahuquillo J, Petit S, Pons J (2018) Improving system turnaround time with intel CAT by identifying LLC critical applications. In: Euro-Par 2018—Parallel Processing—24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Turin, Italy, 27–31 Aug 2018, Proceedings, pp 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96983-1_43Qureshi M, Patt Y (2006) Utility-based cache partitioning: a low-overhead, high-performance, runtime mechanism to partition shared caches. In: MICRO, pp 423–432Rivers JA, Tam ES, Tyson GS, Davidson ES, Farrens MK (1998) Utilizing reuse information in data cache management. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Supercomputing, ICS 1998, Melbourne, Australia, 13–17 July 1998, pp 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1145/277830.277941Rosenfeld P, Cooper-Balis E, Jacob B (2011) Dramsim2: a cycle accurate memory system simulator. IEEE Comput Archit Lett 10:16–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/L-CA.2011.4Sahuquillo J, Pont A (1999) The filter cache: a run-time cache management approach1. In: 25th EUROMICRO ’99 Conference, Informatics: Theory and Practice for the New Millenium, 8–10 Sept 1999, Milan, Italy, pp 1424–1431. https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.1999.794504Sahuquillo J, Pont A (2000) Splitting the data cache: a survey. IEEE Concurr 8(3):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/4434.865890Selfa V, Sahuquillo J, Eeckhout L, Petit S, Gómez ME (2017) Application clustering policies to address system fairness with intel’s cache allocation technology. In: 26th International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, PACT 2017, Portland, OR, USA, 9–13 Sept 2017, pp 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2017.19Shacham A, Bergman K, Carloni L (2007) On the design of a photonic network-on-chip. In: Networks-on-Chip, NOCS 2007, pp 53–64Soref R, Bennett B (1987) Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J Quantum Electron 23(1):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073206Henning JL (2006) SPEC CPU2006 benchmark descriptions. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 34(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/1186736.1186737Tsai PA, Beckmann N, Sanchez D (2017) Jenga: software-defined cache hierarchies. SIGARCH Comput Archit News 45(2):652–665. https://doi.org/10.1145/3140659.3080214Ubal R, Sahuquillo J, Petit S, Lopez P (2007) Multi2sim: a simulation framework to evaluate multicore-multithreaded processors. In: International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing, pp 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1109/SBAC-PAD.2007.17Valero A, Sahuquillo J, Petit S, López P, Duato J (2012) Combining recency of information with selective random and a victim cache in last-level caches. ACM Trans Archit Code Optim 9(3):16:1–16:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2355585.2355589Vantrease D, Binkert N, Schreiber R, Lipasti M (2009) Light speed arbitration and flow control for nanophotonic interconnects. In: Microarchitecture, 2009. MICRO-42. 42nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium, pp 304–315Werner S, Navaridas J, Lujan M (2017) Designing low-power, low-latency networks-on-chip by optimally combining electrical and optical links. In: 2017 IEEE International Symposium of High Performance Computer Architectur