Deep D-Bar: Real-Time Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging With Deep Neural Networks

The mathematical problem for electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a highly nonlinear ill-posed inverse problem requiring carefully designed reconstruction procedures to ensure reliable image generation. D-bar methods are based on a rigorous mathematical analysis and provide robust direct reconstructions by using a low-pass filtering of the associated nonlinear Fourier data. Similarly to low-pass filtering of linear Fourier data, only using low frequencies in the image recovery process results in blurred images lacking sharp features, such as clear organ boundaries. Convolutional neural networks provide a powerful framework for post-processing such convolved direct reconstructions. In this paper, we demonstrate that these CNN techniques lead to sharp and reliable reconstructions even for the highly nonlinear inverse problem of EIT. The network is trained on data sets of simulated examples and then applied to experimental data without the need to perform an additional transfer training. Results for absolute EIT images are presented using experimental EIT data from the ACT4 and KIT4 EIT systems

Fully automated accurate patient positioning in computed tomography using anterior-posterior localizer images and a deep neural network: a dual-center study

Objectives This study aimed to improve patient positioning accuracy by relying on a CT localizer and a deep neural network to optimize image quality and radiation dose. Methods We included 5754 chest CT axial and anterior–posterior (AP) images from two diferent centers, C1 and C2. After pre-processing, images were split into training (80%) and test (20%) datasets. A deep neural network was trained to generate 3D axial images from the AP localizer. The geometric centerlines of patient bodies were indicated by creating a bounding box on the predicted images. The distance between the body centerline, estimated by the deep learning model and ground truth (BCAP), was compared with patient mis-centering during manual positioning (BCMP). We evaluated the performance of our model in terms of distance between the lung centerline estimated by the deep learning model and the ground truth (LCAP). Results The error in terms of BCAP was − 0.75 ± 7.73 mm and 2.06 ± 10.61 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. This error was signifcantly lower than BCMP, which achieved an error of 9.35 ± 14.94 and 13.98 ± 14.5 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The absolute BCAP was 5.7 ± 5.26 and 8.26 ± 6.96 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The LCAP metric was 1.56 ± 10.8 and −0.27 ± 16.29 mm for C1 and C2, respectively. The error in terms of BCAP and LCAP was higher for larger patients (p value<0.01). Conclusion The accuracy of the proposed method was comparable to available alternative methods, carrying the advantage of being free from errors related to objects blocking the camera visibility

Deep Learning-based calculation of patient size and attenuation surrogates from localizer Image: Toward personalized chest CT protocol optimization

Purpose: Extracting water equivalent diameter (DW), as a good descriptor of patient size, from the CT localizer before the spiral scan not only minimizes truncation errors due to the limited scan field-of-view but also enables prior size-specific dose estimation as well as scan protocol optimization. This study proposed a unified methodology to measure patient size, shape, and attenuation parameters from a 2D anterior-posterior localizer image using deep learning algorithms without the need for labor-intensive vendor-specific calibration procedures. Methods: 3D CT chest images and 2D localizers were collected for 4005 patients. A modified U-NET architecture was trained to predict the 3D CT images from their corresponding localizer scans. The algorithm was tested on 648 and 138 external cases with fixed and variable table height positions. To evaluate the performance of the prediction model, structural similarity index measure (SSIM), body area, body contour, Dice index, and water equivalent diameter (DW) were calculated and compared between the predicted 3D CT images and the ground truth (GT) images in a slicewise manner. Results: The average age of the patients included in this study (1827 male and 1554 female) was 53.8 ± 17.9 (18–120) years. The DW, tube current ,and CTDIvol measured on original axial images in the external 138 cases group were significantly larger than those of the external 648 cases (P < 0.05). The SSIM and Dice index calculated between the prediction and GT for body contour were 0.998 ± 0.001 and 0.950 ± 0.016, respectively. The average percentage error in the calculation of DW was 2.7 ± 3.5 %. The error in the DW calculation was more considerable in larger patients (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions: We developed a model to predict the patient size, shape, and attenuation factors slice-by-slice prior to spiral scanning. The model exhibited remarkable robustness to table height variations. The estimated parameters are helpful for patient dose reduction and protocol optimization

Improving Radiotherapy Targeting for Cancer Treatment Through Space and Time

Radiotherapy is a common medical treatment in which lethal doses of ionizing radiation are preferentially delivered to cancerous tumors. In external beam radiotherapy, radiation is delivered by a remote source which sits several feet from the patient\u27s surface. Although great effort is taken in properly aligning the target to the path of the radiation beam, positional uncertainties and other errors can compromise targeting accuracy. Such errors can lead to a failure in treating the target, and inflict significant toxicity to healthy tissues which are inadvertently exposed high radiation doses. Tracking the movement of targeted anatomy between and during treatment fractions provides valuable localization information that allows for the reduction of these positional uncertainties. Inter- and intra-fraction anatomical localization data not only allows for more accurate treatment setup, but also potentially allows for 1) retrospective treatment evaluation, 2) margin reduction and modification of the dose distribution to accommodate daily anatomical changes (called `adaptive radiotherapy\u27), and 3) targeting interventions during treatment (for example, suspending radiation delivery while the target it outside the path of the beam). The research presented here investigates the use of inter- and intra-fraction localization technologies to improve radiotherapy to targets through enhanced spatial and temporal accuracy. These technologies provide significant advancements in cancer treatment compared to standard clinical technologies. Furthermore, work is presented for the use of localization data acquired from these technologies in adaptive treatment planning, an investigational technique in which the distribution of planned dose is modified during the course of treatment based on biological and/or geometrical changes of the patient\u27s anatomy. The focus of this research is directed at abdominal sites, which has historically been central to the problem of motion management in radiation therapy

Respiration-Induced Intraorgan Deformation of the Liver: Implications for Treatment Planning in Patients Treated With Fiducial Tracking.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a well-tolerated modality for the treatment of primary and metastatic liver lesions, and fiducials are often used as surrogates for tumor tracking during treatment. We evaluated respiratory-induced liver deformation by measuring the rigidity of the fiducial configuration during the breathing cycle. Seventeen patients, with 18 distinct treatment courses, were treated with stereotactic body radiosurgery using multiple fiducials. Liver deformation was empirically quantified by measuring the intrafiducial distances at different phases of respiration. Data points were collected at the 0%, 50%, and 100% inspiration points, and the distance between each pair of fiducials was measured at the 3 phases. The rigid body error was calculated as the maximum difference in the intrafiducial distances. Liver disease was calculated with Child-Pugh score using laboratory values within 3 months of initiation of treatment. A peripheral fiducial was defined as within 1.5 cm of the liver edge, and all other fiducials were classified as central. For 5 patients with only peripheral fiducials, the fiducial configuration had more deformation (average maximum rigid body error 7.11 mm, range: 1.89-11.35 mm) when compared to patients with both central and peripheral and central fiducials only (average maximum rigid body error 3.36 mm, range: 0.5-9.09 mm, P = .037). The largest rigid body errors (11.3 and 10.6 mm) were in 2 patients with Child-Pugh class A liver disease and multiple peripheral fiducials. The liver experiences internal deformation, and the fiducial configuration should not be assumed to act as a static structure. We observed greater deformation at the periphery than at the center of the liver. In our small data set, we were not able to identify cirrhosis, which is associated with greater rigidity of the liver, as predictive for deformation. Treatment planning based only on fiducial localization must take potential intraorgan deformation into account

Articulated Whole-Body Atlases for Small Animal Image Analysis: Construction and Applications

Bone and mineral researc