Texture Structure Analysis

abstract: Texture analysis plays an important role in applications like automated pattern inspection, image and video compression, content-based image retrieval, remote-sensing, medical imaging and document processing, to name a few. Texture Structure Analysis is the process of studying the structure present in the textures. This structure can be expressed in terms of perceived regularity. Our human visual system (HVS) uses the perceived regularity as one of the important pre-attentive cues in low-level image understanding. Similar to the HVS, image processing and computer vision systems can make fast and efficient decisions if they can quantify this regularity automatically. In this work, the problem of quantifying the degree of perceived regularity when looking at an arbitrary texture is introduced and addressed. One key contribution of this work is in proposing an objective no-reference perceptual texture regularity metric based on visual saliency. Other key contributions include an adaptive texture synthesis method based on texture regularity, and a low-complexity reduced-reference visual quality metric for assessing the quality of synthesized textures. In order to use the best performing visual attention model on textures, the performance of the most popular visual attention models to predict the visual saliency on textures is evaluated. Since there is no publicly available database with ground-truth saliency maps on images with exclusive texture content, a new eye-tracking database is systematically built. Using the Visual Saliency Map (VSM) generated by the best visual attention model, the proposed texture regularity metric is computed. The proposed metric is based on the observation that VSM characteristics differ between textures of differing regularity. The proposed texture regularity metric is based on two texture regularity scores, namely a textural similarity score and a spatial distribution score. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed regularity metric, a texture regularity database called RegTEX, is built as a part of this work. It is shown through subjective testing that the proposed metric has a strong correlation with the Mean Opinion Score (MOS) for the perceived regularity of textures. The proposed method is also shown to be robust to geometric and photometric transformations and outperforms some of the popular texture regularity metrics in predicting the perceived regularity. The impact of the proposed metric to improve the performance of many image-processing applications is also presented. The influence of the perceived texture regularity on the perceptual quality of synthesized textures is demonstrated through building a synthesized textures database named SynTEX. It is shown through subjective testing that textures with different degrees of perceived regularities exhibit different degrees of vulnerability to artifacts resulting from different texture synthesis approaches. This work also proposes an algorithm for adaptively selecting the appropriate texture synthesis method based on the perceived regularity of the original texture. A reduced-reference texture quality metric for texture synthesis is also proposed as part of this work. The metric is based on the change in perceived regularity and the change in perceived granularity between the original and the synthesized textures. The perceived granularity is quantified through a new granularity metric that is proposed in this work. It is shown through subjective testing that the proposed quality metric, using just 2 parameters, has a strong correlation with the MOS for the fidelity of synthesized textures and outperforms the state-of-the-art full-reference quality metrics on 3 different texture databases. Finally, the ability of the proposed regularity metric in predicting the perceived degradation of textures due to compression and blur artifacts is also established.Dissertation/ThesisPh.D. Electrical Engineering 201

Research Article Visual Perception Based Objective Stereo Image Quality Assessment for 3D Video Communication

Abstract: Stereo image quality assessment is a crucial and challenging issue in 3D video communication. One of major difficulties is how to weigh binocular masking effect. In order to establish the assessment mode more in line with the human visual system, Watson model is adopted, which defines visibility threshold under no distortion composed of contrast sensitivity, masking effect and error in this study. As a result, we propose an Objective Stereo Image Quality Assessment method (OSIQA), organically combining a new Left-Right view Image Quality Assessment (LR-IQA) metric and Depth Perception Image Quality Assessment (DP-IQA) metric. The new LR-IQA metric is first given to calculate the changes of perception coefficients in each sub-band utilizing Watson model and human visual system after wavelet decomposition of left and right images in stereo image pair, respectively. Then, a concept of absolute difference map is defined to describe abstract differential value between the left and right view images and the DP-IQA metric is presented to measure structure distortion of the original and distorted abstract difference maps through luminance function, error sensitivity and contrast function. Finally, an OSIQA metric is generated by using multiplicative fitting of the LR-IQA and DP-IQA metrics based on weighting. Experimental results shows that the proposed method are highly correlated with human visual judgments (Mean Opinion Score) and the correlation coefficient and monotony are more than 0.92 under five types of distortions such as Gaussian blur, Gaussian noise, JP2K compression, JPEG compression and H.264 compression

Stereoscopic video quality assessment using binocular energy

Stereoscopic imaging is becoming increasingly popular. However, to ensure the best quality of experience, there is a need to develop more robust and accurate objective metrics for stereoscopic content quality assessment. Existing stereoscopic image and video metrics are either extensions of conventional 2D metrics (with added depth or disparity information) or are based on relatively simple perceptual models. Consequently, they tend to lack the accuracy and robustness required for stereoscopic content quality assessment. This paper introduces full-reference stereoscopic image and video quality metrics based on a Human Visual System (HVS) model incorporating important physiological findings on binocular vision. The proposed approach is based on the following three contributions. First, it introduces a novel HVS model extending previous models to include the phenomena of binocular suppression and recurrent excitation. Second, an image quality metric based on the novel HVS model is proposed. Finally, an optimised temporal pooling strategy is introduced to extend the metric to the video domain. Both image and video quality metrics are obtained via a training procedure to establish a relationship between subjective scores and objective measures of the HVS model. The metrics are evaluated using publicly available stereoscopic image/video databases as well as a new stereoscopic video database. An extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the robustness of the proposed quality metrics. This indicates a considerable improvement with respect to the state-of-the-art with average correlations with subjective scores of 0.86 for the proposed stereoscopic image metric and 0.89 and 0.91 for the proposed stereoscopic video metrics

Scalable image quality assessment with 2D mel-cepstrum and machine learning approach

Cataloged from PDF version of article.Measurement of image quality is of fundamental importance to numerous image and video processing applications. Objective image quality assessment (IQA) is a two-stage process comprising of the following: (a) extraction of important information and discarding the redundant one, (b) pooling the detected features using appropriate weights. These two stages are not easy to tackle due to the complex nature of the human visual system (HVS). In this paper, we first investigate image features based on two-dimensional (20) mel-cepstrum for the purpose of IQA. It is shown that these features are effective since they can represent the structural information, which is crucial for IQA. Moreover, they are also beneficial in a reduced-reference scenario where only partial reference image information is used for quality assessment. We address the second issue by exploiting machine learning. In our opinion, the well established methodology of machine learning/pattern recognition has not been adequately used for IQA so far; we believe that it will be an effective tool for feature pooling since the required weights/parameters can be determined in a more convincing way via training with the ground truth obtained according to subjective scores. This helps to overcome the limitations of the existing pooling methods, which tend to be over simplistic and lack theoretical justification. Therefore, we propose a new metric by formulating IQA as a pattern recognition problem. Extensive experiments conducted using six publicly available image databases (totally 3211 images with diverse distortions) and one video database (with 78 video sequences) demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed metric, in comparison with seven relevant existing metrics. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Image Quality Metrics for Stochastic Rasterization

We develop a simple perceptual image quality metric for images resulting from stochastic rasterization. The new metric is based on the frequency selectivity of cortical cells, using ideas derived from existing perceptual metrics and research of the human visual system. Masking is not taken into account in the metric, since it does not have a significant effect in this specific application. The new metric achieves high correlation with results from HDR-VDP2 while being conceptually simple and accurately reflecting smaller quality differences than the existing metrics. In addition to HDR-VDP2, measurement results are compared against MS-SSIM results. The new metric is applied to a set of images produced with different sampling schemes to provide quantitative information about the relative quality, strengths, and weaknesses of the different sampling schemes. Several purpose-built three-dimensional test scenes are used for this quality analysis in addition to a few widely used natural scenes. The star discrepancy of sampling patterns is found to be correlated to the average perceptual quality, even though discrepancy can not be recommended as the sole method for estimating perceptual quality. A hardware-friendly low-discrepancy sampling scheme achieves generally good results, but the quality difference to simpler per-pixel stratified sampling decreases as the sample count increases. A comprehensive mathematical model of rendering discrete frames from dynamic 3D scenes is provided as background to the quality analysis

Subjective and objective quality assessment of ancient degraded documents

Archiving, restoration and analysis of damaged manuscripts have been largely increased in recent decades. Usually, these documents are physically degraded because of aging and improper handing. They also cannot be processed manually because a massive volume of these documents exist in libraries and archives around the world. Therefore, automatic methodologies are needed to preserve and to process their content. These documents are usually processed through their images. Degraded document image processing is a difficult task mainly because of the existing physical degradations. While it can be very difficult to accurately locate and remove such distortions, analyzing the severity and type(s) of these distortions is feasible. This analysis provides useful information on the type and severity of degradations with a number of applications. The main contributions of this thesis are to propose models for objectively assessing the physical condition of document images and to classify their degradations. In this thesis, three datasets of degraded document images along with the subjective ratings for each image are developed. In addition, three no-reference document image quality assessment (NR-DIQA) metrics are proposed for historical and medieval document images. It should be mentioned that degraded medieval document images are a subset of the historical document images and may contain both graphical and textual content. Finally, we propose a degradation classification model in order to identify common distortion types in old document images. Essentially, existing no reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) metrics are not designed to assess physical document distortions. In the first contribution, we propose the first dataset of degraded document images along with the human opinion scores for each document image. This dataset is introduced to evaluate the quality of historical document images. We also propose an objective NR-DIQA metric based on the statistics of the mean subtracted contrast normalized (MSCN) coefficients computed from segmented layers of each document image. The segmentation into four layers of foreground and background is done based on an analysis of the log-Gabor filters. This segmentation is based on the assumption that the sensitivity of the human visual system (HVS) is different at the locations of text and non-text. Experimental results show that the proposed metric has comparable or better performance than the state-of-the-art metrics, while it has a moderate complexity. Degradation identification and quality assessment can complement each other to provide information on both type and severity of degradations in document images. Therefore, we introduced, in the second contribution, a multi-distortion historical document image database that can be used for the research on quality assessment of degraded documents as well as degradation classification. The developed dataset contains historical document images which are classified into four categories based on their distortion types, namely, paper translucency, stain, readers’ annotations, and worn holes. An efficient NR-DIQA metric is then proposed based on three sets of spatial and frequency image features extracted from two layers of text and non-text. In addition, these features are used to estimate the probability of the four aforementioned physical distortions for the first time in the literature. Both proposed quality assessment and degradation classification models deliver a very promising performance. Finally, we develop in the third contribution a dataset and a quality assessment metric for degraded medieval document (DMD) images. This type of degraded images contains both textual and pictorial information. The introduced DMD dataset is the first dataset in its category that also provides human ratings. Also, we propose a new no-reference metric in order to evaluate the quality of DMD images in the developed dataset. The proposed metric is based on the extraction of several statistical features from three layers of text, non-text, and graphics. The segmentation is based on color saliency with assumption that pictorial parts are colorful. It also follows HVS that gives different weights to each layer. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed NR-DIQA strategy for DMD images

Evaluating and Improving Image Quality of Tiled Displays

Tiled displays are created by grouping multiple displays together to form one very large display. These tiled displays are often the only suitable option for displaying very large images but suffer from a grid distortion caused by gaps between each sub-display’s active region. This grid distortion is fundamentally different from other, well-studied, image distortions (e.g., blur, noise, compression) and the impact of these grid distortions has thus far not been studied. This research addresses this lack of attention by investigating the grid distortion’s quality impact and creating perceptual algorithms to reduce this impact. We measure the quality impact of the grid distortion by creating two new image quality assessment (IQA) databases for tiled images. These databases provide significant insight into the unique characteristics of the grid distortion and provide a baseline against which to measure the performance of current IQA metrics. We use these databases to show that current metrics do not adequately reflect the quality impact of the grid distortions, and we create a new metric specifically for tiled images that statistically (with 95% confidence) outperforms current metrics. We improve perceived tiled display image quality by creating new image-correction algorithms based on elements of the human visual system (HVS). These correction techniques modify the perceived quality of the displayed images without directly modifying the static grid distortion. These algorithms are shown, through the use of a third subjective user study, to clearly and consistently improve the perceived quality of tiled images.1 yea

A Perceptually Based Comparison of Image Similarity Metrics

The assessment of how well one image matches another forms a critical component both of models of human visual processing and of many image analysis systems. Two of the most commonly used norms for quantifying image similarity are L1 and L2, which are specific instances of the Minkowski metric. However, there is often not a principled reason for selecting one norm over the other. One way to address this problem is by examining whether one metric, better than the other, captures the perceptual notion of image similarity. This can be used to derive inferences regarding similarity criteria the human visual system uses, as well as to evaluate and design metrics for use in image-analysis applications. With this goal, we examined perceptual preferences for images retrieved on the basis of the L1 versus the L2 norm. These images were either small fragments without recognizable content, or larger patterns with recognizable content created by vector quantization. In both conditions the participants showed a small but consistent preference for images matched with the L1 metric. These results suggest that, in the domain of natural images of the kind we have used, the L1 metric may better capture human notions of image similarity