A note on forbidding clique immersions

Robertson and Seymour proved that the relation of graph immersion is well-quasi-ordered for finite graphs. Their proof uses the results of graph minors theory. Surprisingly, there is a very short proof of the corresponding rough structure theorem for graphs without $K_t$-immersions; it is based on the Gomory-Hu theorem. The same proof also works to establish a rough structure theorem for Eulerian digraphs without $\vec{K}_t$-immersions, where $\vec{K}_t$ denotes the bidirected complete digraph of order $t$

The structure of graphs not admitting a fixed immersion

We present an easy structure theorem for graphs which do not admit an immersion of the complete graph. The theorem motivates the definition of a variation of tree decompositions based on edge cuts instead of vertex cuts which we call tree-cut decompositions. We give a definition for the width of tree-cut decompositions, and using this definition along with the structure theorem for excluded clique immersions, we prove that every graph either has bounded tree-cut width or admits an immersion of a large wall

The structure of graphs not admitting a fixed immersion

We present an easy structure theorem for graphs which do not admit an immersion of the complete graph. The theorem motivates the definition of a variation of tree decompositions based on edge cuts instead of vertex cuts which we call tree-cut decompositions. We give a definition for the width of tree-cut decompositions, and using this definition along with the structure theorem for excluded clique immersions, we prove that every graph either has bounded tree-cut width or admits an immersion of a large wall

Constructing graphs with no immersion of large complete graphs

In 1989, Lescure and Meyniel proved, for $d=5, 6$, that every $d$-chromatic graph contains an immersion of $K_d$, and in 2003 Abu-Khzam and Langston conjectured that this holds for all $d$. In 2010, DeVos, Kawarabayashi, Mohar, and Okamura proved this conjecture for $d = 7$. In each proof, the $d$-chromatic assumption was not fully utilized, as the proofs only use the fact that a $d$-critical graph has minimum degree at least $d - 1$. DeVos, Dvo\v{r}\'ak, Fox, McDonald, Mohar, and Scheide show the stronger conjecture that a graph with minimum degree $d-1$ has an immersion of $K_d$ fails for $d=10$ and $d\geq 12$ with a finite number of examples for each value of $d$, and small chromatic number relative to $d$, but it is shown that a minimum degree of $200d$ does guarantee an immersion of $K_d$. In this paper we show that the stronger conjecture is false for $d=8,9,11$ and give infinite families of examples with minimum degree $d-1$ and chromatic number $d-3$ or $d-2$ that do not contain an immersion of $K_d$. Our examples can be up to $(d-2)$-edge-connected. We show, using Haj\'os' Construction, that there is an infinite class of non-$(d-1)$-colorable graphs that contain an immersion of $K_d$. We conclude with some open questions, and the conjecture that a graph $G$ with minimum degree $d - 1$ and more than $\frac{|V(G)|}{1+m(d+1)}$ vertices of degree at least $md$ has an immersion of $K_d$