26,826 research outputs found
Generating indicative-informative summaries with SumUM
We present and evaluate SumUM, a text summarization system that takes a raw technical text as input and produces an indicative informative summary. The indicative part of the summary identifies the topics of the document, and the informative part elaborates on some of these topics according to the reader's interest. SumUM motivates the topics, describes entities, and defines concepts. It is a first step for exploring the issue of dynamic summarization. This is accomplished through a process of shallow syntactic and semantic analysis, concept identification, and text regeneration. Our method was developed through the study of a corpus of abstracts written by professional abstractors. Relying on human judgment, we have evaluated indicativeness, informativeness, and text acceptability of the automatic summaries. The results thus far indicate good performance when compared with other summarization technologies
Adapting the Neural Encoder-Decoder Framework from Single to Multi-Document Summarization
Generating a text abstract from a set of documents remains a challenging
task. The neural encoder-decoder framework has recently been exploited to
summarize single documents, but its success can in part be attributed to the
availability of large parallel data automatically acquired from the Web. In
contrast, parallel data for multi-document summarization are scarce and costly
to obtain. There is a pressing need to adapt an encoder-decoder model trained
on single-document summarization data to work with multiple-document input. In
this paper, we present an initial investigation into a novel adaptation method.
It exploits the maximal marginal relevance method to select representative
sentences from multi-document input, and leverages an abstractive
encoder-decoder model to fuse disparate sentences to an abstractive summary.
The adaptation method is robust and itself requires no training data. Our
system compares favorably to state-of-the-art extractive and abstractive
approaches judged by automatic metrics and human assessors.Comment: 11 page
Abstractive Multi-Document Summarization via Phrase Selection and Merging
We propose an abstraction-based multi-document summarization framework that
can construct new sentences by exploring more fine-grained syntactic units than
sentences, namely, noun/verb phrases. Different from existing abstraction-based
approaches, our method first constructs a pool of concepts and facts
represented by phrases from the input documents. Then new sentences are
generated by selecting and merging informative phrases to maximize the salience
of phrases and meanwhile satisfy the sentence construction constraints. We
employ integer linear optimization for conducting phrase selection and merging
simultaneously in order to achieve the global optimal solution for a summary.
Experimental results on the benchmark data set TAC 2011 show that our framework
outperforms the state-of-the-art models under automated pyramid evaluation
metric, and achieves reasonably well results on manual linguistic quality
evaluation.Comment: 11 pages, 1 figure, accepted as a full paper at ACL 201
Generating Abstractive Summaries from Meeting Transcripts
Summaries of meetings are very important as they convey the essential content
of discussions in a concise form. Generally, it is time consuming to read and
understand the whole documents. Therefore, summaries play an important role as
the readers are interested in only the important context of discussions. In
this work, we address the task of meeting document summarization. Automatic
summarization systems on meeting conversations developed so far have been
primarily extractive, resulting in unacceptable summaries that are hard to
read. The extracted utterances contain disfluencies that affect the quality of
the extractive summaries. To make summaries much more readable, we propose an
approach to generating abstractive summaries by fusing important content from
several utterances. We first separate meeting transcripts into various topic
segments, and then identify the important utterances in each segment using a
supervised learning approach. The important utterances are then combined
together to generate a one-sentence summary. In the text generation step, the
dependency parses of the utterances in each segment are combined together to
create a directed graph. The most informative and well-formed sub-graph
obtained by integer linear programming (ILP) is selected to generate a
one-sentence summary for each topic segment. The ILP formulation reduces
disfluencies by leveraging grammatical relations that are more prominent in
non-conversational style of text, and therefore generates summaries that is
comparable to human-written abstractive summaries. Experimental results show
that our method can generate more informative summaries than the baselines. In
addition, readability assessments by human judges as well as log-likelihood
estimates obtained from the dependency parser show that our generated summaries
are significantly readable and well-formed.Comment: 10 pages, Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document
Engineering, DocEng' 201
- …