The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialogue on Embodiment and Computational Modeling

Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamouring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensory-motor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialogue between two fictional characters: Ernest, the �experimenter�, and Mary, the �computational modeller�. The dialogue consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modelling

Challenges for artificial cognitive systems

The declared goal of this paper is to fill this gap: “... cognitive systems research needs questions or challenges that define progress. The challenges are not (yet more) predictions of the future, but a guideline to what are the aims and what would constitute progress.” – the quotation being from the project description of EUCogII, the project for the European Network for Cognitive Systems within which this formulation of the ‘challenges’ was originally developed (http://www.eucognition.org). So, we stick out our neck and formulate the challenges for artificial cognitive systems. These challenges are articulated in terms of a definition of what a cognitive system is: a system that learns from experience and uses its acquired knowledge (both declarative and practical) in a flexible manner to achieve its own goals

10081 Abstracts Collection -- Cognitive Robotics

From 21.02. to 26.02.2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10081 ``Cognitive Robotics \u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

Integration of Action and Language Knowledge: A Roadmap for Developmental Robotics

“This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder." “Copyright IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.”This position paper proposes that the study of embodied cognitive agents, such as humanoid robots, can advance our understanding of the cognitive development of complex sensorimotor, linguistic, and social learning skills. This in turn will benefit the design of cognitive robots capable of learning to handle and manipulate objects and tools autonomously, to cooperate and communicate with other robots and humans, and to adapt their abilities to changing internal, environmental, and social conditions. Four key areas of research challenges are discussed, specifically for the issues related to the understanding of: 1) how agents learn and represent compositional actions; 2) how agents learn and represent compositional lexica; 3) the dynamics of social interaction and learning; and 4) how compositional action and language representations are integrated to bootstrap the cognitive system. The review of specific issues and progress in these areas is then translated into a practical roadmap based on a series of milestones. These milestones provide a possible set of cognitive robotics goals and test scenarios, thus acting as a research roadmap for future work on cognitive developmental robotics.Peer reviewe

Dynamic Cognition Applied to Value Learning in Artificial Intelligence

Experts in Artificial Intelligence (AI) development predict that advances in the dvelopment of intelligent systems and agents will reshape vital areas in our society. Nevertheless, if such an advance isn't done with prudence, it can result in negative outcomes for humanity. For this reason, several researchers in the area are trying to develop a robust, beneficial, and safe concept of artificial intelligence. Currently, several of the open problems in the field of AI research arise from the difficulty of avoiding unwanted behaviors of intelligent agents, and at the same time specifying what we want such systems to do. It is of utmost importance that artificial intelligent agents have their values aligned with human values, given the fact that we cannot expect an AI to develop our moral preferences simply because of its intelligence, as discussed in the Orthogonality Thesis. Perhaps this difficulty comes from the way we are addressing the problem of expressing objectives, values, and ends, using representational cognitive methods. A solution to this problem would be the dynamic cognitive approach proposed by Dreyfus, whose phenomenological philosophy defends that the human experience of being-in-the-world cannot be represented by the symbolic or connectionist cognitive methods. A possible approach to this problem would be to use theoretical models such as SED (situated embodied dynamics) to address the values learning problem in AI

Shared Perception in Human-Robot Interaction

Interaction can be seen as a composition of perspectives: the integration of perceptions, intentions, and actions on the environment two or more agents share. For an interaction to be effective, each agent must be prone to “sharedness”: being situated in a common environment, able to read what others express about their perspective, and ready to adjust one’s own perspective accordingly. In this sense, effective interaction is supported by perceiving the environment jointly with others, a capability that in this research is called Shared Perception. Nonetheless, perception is a complex process that brings the observer receiving sensory inputs from the external world and interpreting them based on its own, previous experiences, predictions, and intentions. In addition, social interaction itself contributes to shaping what is perceived: others’ attention, perspective, actions, and internal states may also be incorporated into perception. Thus, Shared perception reflects the observer's ability to integrate these three sources of information: the environment, the self, and other agents. If Shared Perception is essential among humans, it is equally crucial for interaction with robots, which need social and cognitive abilities to interact with humans naturally and successfully. This research deals with Shared Perception within the context of Social Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and involves an interdisciplinary approach. The two general axes of the thesis are the investigation of human perception while interacting with robots and the modeling of robot’s perception while interacting with humans. Such two directions are outlined through three specific Research Objectives, whose achievements represent the contribution of this work. i) The formulation of a theoretical framework of Shared Perception in HRI valid for interpreting and developing different socio-perceptual mechanisms and abilities. ii) The investigation of Shared Perception in humans focusing on the perceptual mechanism of Context Dependency, and therefore exploring how social interaction affects the use of previous experience in human spatial perception. iii) The implementation of a deep-learning model for Addressee Estimation to foster robots’ socio-perceptual skills through the awareness of others’ behavior, as suggested in the Shared Perception framework. To achieve the first Research Objective, several human socio-perceptual mechanisms are presented and interpreted in a unified account. This exposition parallels mechanisms elicited by interaction with humans and humanoid robots and aims to build a framework valid to investigate human perception in the context of HRI. Based on the thought of D. Davidson and conceived as the integration of information coming from the environment, the self, and other agents, the idea of "triangulation" expresses the critical dynamics of Shared Perception. Also, it is proposed as the functional structure to support the implementation of socio-perceptual skills in robots. This general framework serves as a reference to fulfill the other two Research Objectives, which explore specific aspects of Shared Perception. For what concerns the second Research Objective, the human perceptual mechanism of Context Dependency is investigated, for the first time, within social interaction. Human perception is based on unconscious inference, where sensory inputs integrate with prior information. This phenomenon helps in facing the uncertainty of the external world with predictions built upon previous experience. To investigate the effect of social interaction on such a mechanism, the iCub robot has been used as an experimental tool to create an interactive scenario with a controlled setting. A user study based on psychophysical methods, Bayesian modeling, and a neural network analysis of human results demonstrated that social interaction influenced Context Dependency so that when interacting with a social agent, humans rely less on their internal models and more on external stimuli. Such results are framed in Shared Perception and contribute to revealing the integration dynamics of the three sources of Shared Perception. The others’ presence and social behavior (other agents) affect the balance between sensory inputs (environment) and personal history (self) in favor of the information shared with others, that is, the environment. The third Research Objective consists of tackling the Addressee Estimation problem, i.e., understanding to whom a speaker is talking, to improve the iCub social behavior in multi-party interactions. Addressee Estimation can be considered a Shared Perception ability because it is achieved by using sensory information from the environment, internal representations of the agents’ position, and, more importantly, the understanding of others’ behavior. An architecture for Addressee Estimation is thus designed considering the integration process of Shared Perception (environment, self, other agents) and partially implemented with respect to the third element: the awareness of others’ behavior. To achieve this, a hybrid deep-learning (CNN+LSTM) model is developed to estimate the speaker-robot relative placement of the addressee based on the non-verbal behavior of the speaker. Addressee Estimation abilities based on Shared Perception dynamics are aimed at improving multi-party HRI. Making robots aware of other agents’ behavior towards the environment is the first crucial step for incorporating such information into the robot’s perception and modeling Shared Perception

On the Possibility of Robots Having Emotions

I argue against the commonly held intuition that robots and virtual agents will never have emotions by contending robots can have emotions in a sense that is functionally similar to humans, even if the robots\u27 emotions are not exactly equivalent to those of humans. To establish a foundation for assessing the robots\u27 emotional capacities, I first define what emotions are by characterizing the components of emotion consistent across emotion theories. Second, I dissect the affective-cognitive architecture of MIT\u27s Kismet and Leonardo, two robots explicitly designed to express emotions and to interact with humans, in order to explore whether they have emotions. I argue that, although Kismet and Leonardo lack the subjective feelings component of emotion, they are capable of having emotions