Mode-Based versus Activity-Based Search for a Nonredundant Resolution of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem

[EN] This paper addresses an energy-based extension of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (MRCPSP) called MRCPSP-ENERGY. This extension considers the energy consumption as an additional resource that leads to different execution modes (and durations) of the activities. Consequently, different schedules can be obtained. The objective is to maximize the efficiency of the project, which takes into account the minimization of both makespan and energy consumption. This is a well-known NP-hard problem, such that the application of metaheuristic techniques is necessary to address real-size problems in a reasonable time. This paper shows that the Activity List representation, commonly used in metaheuristics, can lead to obtaining many redundant solutions, that is, solutions that have different representations but are in fact the same. This is a serious disadvantage for a search procedure. We propose a genetic algorithm(GA) for solving the MRCPSP-ENERGY, trying to avoid redundant solutions by focusing the search on the execution modes, by using the Mode List representation. The proposed GA is evaluated on different instances of the PSPLIB-ENERGY library and compared to the results obtained by both exact methods and approximate methods reported in the literature. This library is an extension of the well-known PSPLIB library, which contains MRCPSP-ENERGY test cases.This paper has been partially supported by the Spanish Research Projects TIN2013-46511-C2-1-P and TIN2016-80856-R.Morillo-Torres, D.; Barber, F.; Salido, MA. (2017). Mode-Based versus Activity-Based Search for a Nonredundant Resolution of the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2017:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4627856S1152017Mouzon, G., Yildirim, M. B., & Twomey, J. (2007). Operational methods for minimization of energy consumption of manufacturing equipment. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4247-4271. doi:10.1080/00207540701450013Hartmann, S., & Sprecher, A. (1996). A note on «hierarchical models for multi-project planning and scheduling». European Journal of Operational Research, 94(2), 377-383. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00158-1Christofides, N., Alvarez-Valdes, R., & Tamarit, J. M. (1987). Project scheduling with resource constraints: A branch and bound approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 29(3), 262-273. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(87)90240-2Zhu, G., Bard, J. F., & Yu, G. (2006). A Branch-and-Cut Procedure for the Multimode Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 18(3), 377-390. doi:10.1287/ijoc.1040.0121Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (1999). Heuristic Algorithms for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem: Classification and Computational Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 147-178. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5533-9_7Józefowska, J., Mika, M., Różycki, R., Waligóra, G., & Węglarz, J. (2001). Annals of Operations Research, 102(1/4), 137-155. doi:10.1023/a:1010954031930Bouleimen, K., & Lecocq, H. (2003). A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version. European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), 268-281. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00761-0Alcaraz, J., Maroto, C., & Ruiz, R. (2003). Solving the Multi-Mode Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with genetic algorithms. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 614-626. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601563Zhang, H., Tam, C. M., & Li, H. (2006). Multimode Project Scheduling Based on Particle Swarm Optimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(2), 93-103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00420.xJarboui, B., Damak, N., Siarry, P., & Rebai, A. (2008). A combinatorial particle swarm optimization for solving multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195(1), 299-308. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2007.04.096Li, H., & Zhang, H. (2013). Ant colony optimization-based multi-mode scheduling under renewable and nonrenewable resource constraints. Automation in Construction, 35, 431-438. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.030Lova, A., Tormos, P., Cervantes, M., & Barber, F. (2009). An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling projects with resource constraints and multiple execution modes. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(2), 302-316. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.11.002Peteghem, V. V., & Vanhoucke, M. (2010). A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 409-418. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.034Węglarz, J., Józefowska, J., Mika, M., & Waligóra, G. (2011). Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes – A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 208(3), 177-205. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.037Kolisch, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Experimental investigation of heuristics for resource-constrained project scheduling: An update. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(1), 23-37. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.065Debels, D., De Reyck, B., Leus, R., & Vanhoucke, M. (2006). A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(2), 638-653. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.020Paraskevopoulos, D. C., Tarantilis, C. D., & Ioannou, G. (2012). Solving project scheduling problems with resource constraints via an event list-based evolutionary algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 3983-3994. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.062Drexl, A. (1991). Scheduling of Project Networks by Job Assignment. Management Science, 37(12), 1590-1602. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1590BOCTOR, F. F. (1996). Resource-constrained project scheduling by simulated annealing. International Journal of Production Research, 34(8), 2335-2351. doi:10.1080/0020754960890502

Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment

There can be different approaches to the management of resources within the context of multi-project scheduling problems. In general, approaches to multiproject scheduling problems consider the resources as a pool shared by all projects. On the other hand, when projects are distributed geographically or sharing resources between projects is not preferred, then this resource sharing policy may not be feasible. In such cases, the resources must be dedicated to individual projects throughout the project durations. This multi-project problem environment is defined here as the resource dedication problem (RDP). RDP is defined as the optimal dedication of resource capacities to different projects within the overall limits of the resources and with the objective of minimizing a predetermined objective function. The projects involved are multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problems with finish to start zero time lag and non-preemptive activities and limited renewable and nonrenewable resources. Here, the characterization of RDP, its mathematical formulation and two different solution methodologies are presented. The first solution approach is a genetic algorithm employing a new improvement move called combinatorial auction for RDP, which is based on preferences of projects for resources. Two different methods for calculating the projects’ preferences based on linear and Lagrangian relaxation are proposed. The second solution approach is a Lagrangian relaxation based heuristic employing subgradient optimization. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed approaches are powerful methods for solving this problem

An efficient particle swarm optimizer with application to Man-Day project scheduling problems

The multimode resource-constrained project scheduling problem (MRCPSP) has been confirmed to be an NP-hard problem. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been efficiently applied to the search for near optimal solutions to various NP-hard problems. MRCPSP involves solving two subproblems: mode assignment and activity priority determination. Hence, two PSOs are applied to each subproblem. A constriction PSO is proposed for the activity priority determination while a discrete PSO is employed for mode assignment. A least total resource usage (LTRU) heuristic and minimum slack (MSLK) heuristic ensure better initial solutions. To ensure a diverse initial collection of solutions and thereby enhancing the PSO efficiency, a best heuristic rate (HR) is suggested. Moreover, a new communication topology with random links is also introduced to prevent slow and premature convergence. To verify the performance of the approach, the MRCPSP benchmarks in PSPLIB were evaluated and the results compared to other state-of-the-art algorithms. The results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms other algorithms for the MRCPSP problems. Finally, a real-world man-day project scheduling problem (MDPSP)—a MRCPSP problem—was evaluated and the results demonstrate that MDPSP can be solved successfull

Multi-project scheduling with 2-stage decomposition

A non-preemptive, zero time lag multi-project scheduling problem with multiple modes and limited renewable and nonrenewable resources is considered. A 2-stage decomposition approach is adopted to formulate the problem as a hierarchy of 0-1 mathematical programming models. At stage one, each project is reduced to a macro-activity with macro-modes resulting in a single project network where the objective is the maximization of the net present value and the cash flows are positive. For setting the time horizon three different methods are developed and tested. A genetic algorithm approach is designed for this problem, which is also employed to generate a starting solution for the exact solution procedure. Using the starting times and the resource profiles obtained in stage one each project is scheduled at stage two for minimum makespan. The result of the first stage is subjected to a post-processing procedure to distribute the remaining resource capacities. Three new test problem sets are generated with 81, 84 and 27 problems each and three different configurations of solution procedures are tested

The Project Scheduling Problem with Non-Deterministic Activities Duration: A Literature Review

Purpose: The goal of this article is to provide an extensive literature review of the models and solution procedures proposed by many researchers interested on the Project Scheduling Problem with nondeterministic activities duration. Design/methodology/approach: This paper presents an exhaustive literature review, identifying the existing models where the activities duration were taken as uncertain or random parameters. In order to get published articles since 1996, was employed the Scopus database. The articles were selected on the basis of reviews of abstracts, methodologies, and conclusions. The results were classified according to following characteristics: year of publication, mathematical representation of the activities duration, solution techniques applied, and type of problem solved. Findings: Genetic Algorithms (GA) was pointed out as the main solution technique employed by researchers, and the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) as the most studied type of problem. On the other hand, the application of new solution techniques, and the possibility of incorporating traditional methods into new PSP variants was presented as research trends. Originality/value: This literature review contents not only a descriptive analysis of the published articles but also a statistical information section in order to examine the state of the research activity carried out in relation to the Project Scheduling Problem with non-deterministic activities duration.Peer Reviewe

Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem

This paper introduces a multi-project problem environment which involves multiple projects with assigned due dates; with activities that have alternative resource usage modes; a resource dedication policy that does not allow sharing of resources among projects throughout the planning horizon; and a total budget. There are three issues to face when investigating this multiproject environment. First, the total budget should be distributed among different resource types to determine the general resource capacities which correspond to the total amount for each renewable resource to be dedicated to the projects. With the general resource capacities at hand, the next issue is to determine the amounts of resources to be dedicated to the individual projects. With the dedication of resources accomplished, the scheduling of the projects' activities reduces to the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem (MRCPSP) for each individual project. Finally the last issue is the effcient solution of the resulting MRCPSPs. In this paper, this multi-project environment is modeled in an integrated fashion and designated as the Resource Portfolio Problem. A two-phase and a monolithic genetic algorithm are proposed as two solution approaches each of which employs a new improvement move designated as the combinatorial auction for resource portfolio and the combinatorial auction for resource dedication. Computational study using test problems demonstrated the effectiveness of the solution approach proposed

A bi-objective genetic algorithm approach to risk mitigation in project scheduling

A problem of risk mitigation in project scheduling is formulated as a bi-objective optimization problem, where the expected makespan and the expected total cost are both to be minimized. The expected total cost is the sum of four cost components: overhead cost, activity execution cost, cost of reducing risks and penalty cost for tardiness. Risks for activities are predefined. For each risk at an activity, various levels are defined, which correspond to the results of different preventive measures. Only those risks with a probable impact on the duration of the related activity are considered here. Impacts of risks are not only accounted for through the expected makespan but are also translated into cost and thus have an impact on the expected total cost. An MIP model and a heuristic solution approach based on genetic algorithms (GAs) is proposed. The experiments conducted indicate that GAs provide a fast and effective solution approach to the problem. For smaller problems, the results obtained by the GA are very good. For larger problems, there is room for improvement