23 research outputs found

    A Generalized Sylvester-Gallai Type Theorem for Quadratic Polynomials

    Get PDF
    In this work we prove a version of the Sylvester-Gallai theorem for quadratic polynomials that takes us one step closer to obtaining a deterministic polynomial time algorithm for testing zeroness of ?^{[3]}???^{[2]} circuits. Specifically, we prove that if a finite set of irreducible quadratic polynomials ? satisfy that for every two polynomials Q?,Q? ? ? there is a subset ? ? ?, such that Q?,Q? ? ? and whenever Q? and Q? vanish then ?_{Q_i??} Q_i vanishes, then the linear span of the polynomials in ? has dimension O(1). This extends the earlier result [Amir Shpilka, 2019] that showed a similar conclusion when |?| = 1. An important technical step in our proof is a theorem classifying all the possible cases in which a product of quadratic polynomials can vanish when two other quadratic polynomials vanish. I.e., when the product is in the radical of the ideal generated by the two quadratics. This step extends a result from [Amir Shpilka, 2019] that studied the case when one quadratic polynomial is in the radical of two other quadratics

    Radical Sylvester-Gallai Theorem for Tuples of Quadratics

    Get PDF

    Strong Algebras and Radical Sylvester-Gallai Configurations

    Full text link
    In this paper, we prove the following non-linear generalization of the classical Sylvester-Gallai theorem. Let K\mathbb{K} be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 00, and F={F1,,Fm}K[x1,,xN]\mathcal{F}=\{F_1,\cdots,F_m\} \subset \mathbb{K}[x_1,\cdots,x_N] be a set of irreducible homogeneous polynomials of degree at most dd such that FiF_i is not a scalar multiple of FjF_j for iji\neq j. Suppose that for any two distinct Fi,FjFF_i,F_j\in \mathcal{F}, there is ki,jk\neq i,j such that Fkrad(Fi,Fj)F_k\in \mathrm{rad}(F_i,F_j). We prove that such radical SG configurations must be low dimensional. More precisely, we show that there exists a function λ:NN\lambda : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}, independent of K,N\mathbb{K},N and mm, such that any such configuration F\mathcal{F} must satisfy dim(spanKF)λ(d). \dim (\mathrm{span}_{\mathbb{K}}{\mathcal{F}}) \leq \lambda(d). Our result confirms a conjecture of Gupta [Gup14, Conjecture 2] and generalizes the quadratic and cubic Sylvester-Gallai theorems of [S20,OS22]. Our result takes us one step closer towards the first deterministic polynomial time algorithm for the Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT) problem for depth-4 circuits of bounded top and bottom fanins. Our result, when combined with the Stillman uniformity type results of [AH20a,DLL19,ESS21], yields uniform bounds for several algebraic invariants such as projective dimension, Betti numbers and Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of ideals generated by radical SG configurations.Comment: 62 pages. Comments are welcome

    Deterministic Identity Testing Paradigms for Bounded Top-Fanin Depth-4 Circuits

    Get PDF
    Polynomial Identity Testing (PIT) is a fundamental computational problem. The famous depth-4 reduction (Agrawal & Vinay, FOCS\u2708) has made PIT for depth-4 circuits, an enticing pursuit. The largely open special-cases of sum-product-of-sum-of-univariates (?^[k] ? ? ?) and sum-product-of-constant-degree-polynomials (?^[k] ? ? ?^[?]), for constants k, ?, have been a source of many great ideas in the last two decades. For eg. depth-3 ideas (Dvir & Shpilka, STOC\u2705; Kayal & Saxena, CCC\u2706; Saxena & Seshadhri, FOCS\u2710, STOC\u2711); depth-4 ideas (Beecken, Mittmann & Saxena, ICALP\u2711; Saha,Saxena & Saptharishi, Comput.Compl.\u2713; Forbes, FOCS\u2715; Kumar & Saraf, CCC\u2716); geometric Sylvester-Gallai ideas (Kayal & Saraf, FOCS\u2709; Shpilka, STOC\u2719; Peleg & Shpilka, CCC\u2720, STOC\u2721). We solve two of the basic underlying open problems in this work. We give the first polynomial-time PIT for ?^[k] ? ? ?. Further, we give the first quasipolynomial time blackbox PIT for both ?^[k] ? ? ? and ?^[k] ? ? ?^[?]. No subexponential time algorithm was known prior to this work (even if k = ? = 3). A key technical ingredient in all the three algorithms is how the logarithmic derivative, and its power-series, modify the top ?-gate to ?

    Variety Evasive Subspace Families

    Get PDF

    Hitting Sets for Orbits of Circuit Classes and Polynomial Families

    Get PDF
    The orbit of an n-variate polynomial f(?) over a field ? is the set {f(A?+?) : A ? GL(n,?) and ? ? ??}. In this paper, we initiate the study of explicit hitting sets for the orbits of polynomials computable by several natural and well-studied circuit classes and polynomial families. In particular, we give quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of: 1) Low-individual-degree polynomials computable by commutative ROABPs. This implies quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of the elementary symmetric polynomials. 2) Multilinear polynomials computable by constant-width ROABPs. This implies a quasi-polynomial time hitting set for the orbits of the family {IMM_{3,d}}_{d ? ?}, which is complete for arithmetic formulas. 3) Polynomials computable by constant-depth, constant-occur formulas. This implies quasi-polynomial time hitting sets for the orbits of multilinear depth-4 circuits with constant top fan-in, and also polynomial-time hitting sets for the orbits of the power symmetric and the sum-product polynomials. 4) Polynomials computable by occur-once formulas
    corecore