2,719 research outputs found
Asymptotic Validity of the Bayes-Inspired Indifference Zone Procedure: The Non-Normal Known Variance Case
We consider the indifference-zone (IZ) formulation of the ranking and
selection problem in which the goal is to choose an alternative with the
largest mean with guaranteed probability, as long as the difference between
this mean and the second largest exceeds a threshold. Conservatism leads
classical IZ procedures to take too many samples in problems with many
alternatives. The Bayes-inspired Indifference Zone (BIZ) procedure, proposed in
Frazier (2014), is less conservative than previous procedures, but its proof of
validity requires strong assumptions, specifically that samples are normal, and
variances are known with an integer multiple structure. In this paper, we show
asymptotic validity of a slight modification of the original BIZ procedure as
the difference between the best alternative and the second best goes to
zero,when the variances are known and finite, and samples are independent and
identically distributed, but not necessarily normal
Ranking and Selection under Input Uncertainty: Fixed Confidence and Fixed Budget
In stochastic simulation, input uncertainty (IU) is caused by the error in
estimating the input distributions using finite real-world data. When it comes
to simulation-based Ranking and Selection (R&S), ignoring IU could lead to the
failure of many existing selection procedures. In this paper, we study R&S
under IU by allowing the possibility of acquiring additional data. Two
classical R&S formulations are extended to account for IU: (i) for fixed
confidence, we consider when data arrive sequentially so that IU can be reduced
over time; (ii) for fixed budget, a joint budget is assumed to be available for
both collecting input data and running simulations. New procedures are proposed
for each formulation using the frameworks of Sequential Elimination and Optimal
Computing Budget Allocation, with theoretical guarantees provided accordingly
(e.g., upper bound on the expected running time and finite-sample bound on the
probability of false selection). Numerical results demonstrate the
effectiveness of our procedures through a multi-stage production-inventory
problem
Identifying efficient solutions via simulation: myopic multi-objective budget allocation for the bi-objective case
Simulation optimisation offers great opportunities in the design and optimisation of complex systems. In the presence of multiple objectives, there is usually no single solution that performs best on all objectives. Instead, there are several Pareto-optimal (efficient) solutions with different trade-offs which cannot be improved in any objective without sacrificing performance in another objective. For the case where alternatives are evaluated on multiple stochastic criteria, and the performance of an alternative can only be estimated via simulation, we consider the problem of efficiently identifying the Pareto-optimal designs out of a (small) given set of alternatives. We present a simple myopic budget allocation algorithm for multi-objective problems and propose several variants for different settings. In particular, this myopic method only allocates one simulation sample to one alternative in each iteration. This paper shows how the algorithm works in bi-objective problems under different settings. Empirical tests show that our algorithm can significantly reduce the necessary simulation budget
- …