Predictor-corrector interior-point algorithm for sufficient linear complementarity problems based on a new type of algebraic equivalent transformation technique

We propose a new predictor-corrector (PC) interior-point algorithm (IPA) for solving linear complementarity problem (LCP) with P_* (κ)-matrices. The introduced IPA uses a new type of algebraic equivalent transformation (AET) on the centering equations of the system defining the central path. The new technique was introduced by Darvay et al. [21] for linear optimization. The search direction discussed in this paper can be derived from positive-asymptotic kernel function using the function φ(t)=t^2 in the new type of AET. We prove that the IPA has O(1+4κ)√n log⁡〖(3nμ^0)/ε〗 iteration complexity, where κ is an upper bound of the handicap of the input matrix. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first PC IPA for P_* (κ)-LCPs which is based on this search direction

Full Newton-Step Interior-Point Method for Linear Complementarity Problems

In this paper we consider an Infeasible Full Newton-step Interior-Point Method (IFNS-IPM) for monotone Linear Complementarity Problems (LCP). The method does not require a strictly feasible starting point. In addition, the method avoids calculation of the step size and instead takes full Newton-steps at each iteration. Iterates are kept close to the central path by suitable choice of parameters. The algorithm is globally convergent and the iteration bound matches the best known iteration bound for these types of methods

An infeasible interior-point method for the P∗P_*-matrix linear complementarity‎ ‎problem based on a trigonometric kernel function with full-Newton‎ ‎step

An infeasible interior-point algorithm for solving the‎ ‎$P_*$-matrix linear complementarity problem based on a kernel‎ ‎function with trigonometric barrier term is analyzed‎. ‎Each (main)‎ ‎iteration of the algorithm consists of a feasibility step and‎ ‎several centrality steps‎, ‎whose feasibility step is induced by a‎ ‎trigonometric kernel function‎. ‎The complexity result coincides with‎ ‎the best result for infeasible interior-point methods for‎ ‎$P_*$-matrix linear complementarity problem

Improved Full-Newton-Step Infeasible Interior-Point Method for Linear Complementarity Problems

In this thesis, we present an improved version of Infeasible Interior-Point Method (IIPM) for monotone Linear Complementarity Problem (LCP). One of the most important advantages of this version in compare to old version is that it only requires feasibility steps. In the earlier version, each iteration consisted of one feasibility step and some centering steps (at most three in practice). The improved version guarantees that after one feasibility step, the new iterated point is feasible and close enough to central path. Thus, the centering steps are eliminated. This improvement is based on the Lemma(Roos, 2015). Thanks to this lemma, proximity of the new point after the feasibility step is guaranteed with a more strict upper bound. Another advantage of this method is that it uses full-Newton steps, which means that no calculation of the step size is required at each iteration and that the cost is decreased. The implementation and numerical results demonstrate the reliability of the method

Infeasible Full-Newton-Step Interior-Point Method for the Linear Complementarity Problems

In this tesis, we present a new Infeasible Interior-Point Method (IPM) for monotone Linear Complementarity Problem (LPC). The advantage of the method is that it uses full Newton-steps, thus, avoiding the calculation of the step size at each iteration. However, by suitable choice of parameters the iterates are forced to stay in the neighborhood of the central path, hence, still guaranteeing the global convergence of the method under strict feasibility assumption. The number of iterations necessary to find -approximate solution of the problem matches the best known iteration bounds for these types of methods. The preliminary implementation of the method and numerical results indicate robustness and practical validity of the method

Primal-dual interior-point algorithms for linear programs with many inequality constraints

Linear programs (LPs) are one of the most basic and important classes of constrained optimization problems, involving the optimization of linear objective functions over sets defined by linear equality and inequality constraints. LPs have applications to a broad range of problems in engineering and operations research, and often arise as subproblems for algorithms that solve more complex optimization problems. ``Unbalanced'' inequality-constrained LPs with many more inequality constraints than variables are an important subclass of LPs. Under a basic non-degeneracy assumption, only a small number of the constraints can be active at the solution--it is only this active set that is critical to the problem description. On the other hand, the additional constraints make the problem harder to solve. While modern ``interior-point'' algorithms have become recognized as some of the best methods for solving large-scale LPs, they may not be recommended for unbalanced problems, because their per-iteration work does not scale well with the number of constraints. In this dissertation, we investigate "constraint-reduced'' interior-point algorithms designed to efficiently solve unbalanced LPs. At each iteration, these methods construct search directions based only on a small working set of constraints, while ignoring the rest. In this way, they significantly reduce their per-iteration work and, hopefully, their overall running time. In particular, we focus on constraint-reduction methods for the highly efficient primal-dual interior-point (PDIP) algorithms. We propose and analyze a convergent constraint-reduced variant of Mehrotra's predictor-corrector PDIP algorithm, the algorithm implemented in virtually every interior-point software package for linear (and convex-conic) programming. We prove global and local quadratic convergence of this algorithm under a very general class of constraint selection rules and under minimal assumptions. We also propose and analyze two regularized constraint-reduced PDIP algorithms (with similar convergence properties) designed to deal directly with a type of degeneracy that constraint-reduced interior-point algorithms are often subject to. Prior schemes for dealing with this degeneracy could end up negating the benefit of constraint-reduction. Finally, we investigate the performance of our algorithms by applying them to several test and application problems, and show that our algorithms often outperform alternative approaches