1,368 research outputs found
An investigation of tightly coupled time synchronous speech language interfaces using a unification grammar
This paper reports on some experiments on time synchronous interfaces between word recognition and parsing, performed with a beam decoder and a chart parser. Using the same acoustic models, language model, and unification grammar, bottom-up and two interactive protocols were implemented and examined. Results show that close integration is possible without unbearable time penalties, if restrictions from both modules are applied to focus the search process
Integrated speech and morphological processing in a connectionist continuous speech understanding for Korean
A new tightly coupled speech and natural language integration model is
presented for a TDNN-based continuous possibly large vocabulary speech
recognition system for Korean. Unlike popular n-best techniques developed for
integrating mainly HMM-based speech recognition and natural language processing
in a {\em word level}, which is obviously inadequate for morphologically
complex agglutinative languages, our model constructs a spoken language system
based on a {\em morpheme-level} speech and language integration. With this
integration scheme, the spoken Korean processing engine (SKOPE) is designed and
implemented using a TDNN-based diphone recognition module integrated with a
Viterbi-based lexical decoding and symbolic phonological/morphological
co-analysis. Our experiment results show that the speaker-dependent continuous
{\em eojeol} (Korean word) recognition and integrated morphological analysis
can be achieved with over 80.6% success rate directly from speech inputs for
the middle-level vocabularies.Comment: latex source with a4 style, 15 pages, to be published in computer
processing of oriental language journa
Comparison of Language Models by Stochastic Context-Free Grammar, Bigram and Quasi-Simplified-Trigram
In this paper, we investigate the language models by stochasic context-free grammar (SCFG), bigram and quasi-trigram. For calculating of statistics of bigram and quasi-trigram, we used the set of sentences generated randomly from CFG that are legal in terms of semantics. We compared them on the perplexities for their models and the sentence recognition accuracies. The sentence recognition was experimented in the "UNIX-QA" task with the vocabulary size of 521 words. From these results, the perplexities of bigram and quasi-trigram were about 1.6 times and 1.3 times larger than the perplexity of CFG that corresponds to the most restricted grammar (perplexity=10.0), and the perplexity of SCFG is only about 1/2 of CFG. We realized that quasi-trigram had the almost same ability of modeling as the most restricted CFG when the set of plausible sentences in the task was given
Research in the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania
This report takes its name from the Computational Linguistics Feedback Forum (CLiFF), an informal discussion group for students and faculty. However the scope of the research covered in this report is broader than the title might suggest; this is the yearly report of the LINC Lab, the Language, Information and Computation Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania.
It may at first be hard to see the threads that bind together the work presented here, work by faculty, graduate students and postdocs in the Computer Science and Linguistics Departments, and the Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. It includes prototypical Natural Language fields such as: Combinatorial Categorial Grammars, Tree Adjoining Grammars, syntactic parsing and the syntax-semantics interface; but it extends to statistical methods, plan inference, instruction understanding, intonation, causal reasoning, free word order languages, geometric reasoning, medical informatics, connectionism, and language acquisition.
Naturally, this introduction cannot spell out all the connections between these abstracts; we invite you to explore them on your own. In fact, with this issue it’s easier than ever to do so: this document is accessible on the “information superhighway”. Just call up http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~cliff-group/94/cliffnotes.html
In addition, you can find many of the papers referenced in the CLiFF Notes on the net. Most can be obtained by following links from the authors’ abstracts in the web version of this report.
The abstracts describe the researchers’ many areas of investigation, explain their shared concerns, and present some interesting work in Cognitive Science. We hope its new online format makes the CLiFF Notes a more useful and interesting guide to Computational Linguistics activity at Penn
Automatic Recognition of Concurrent and Coupled Human Motion Sequences
We developed methods and algorithms for all parts of a motion recognition system, i. e. Feature Extraction, Motion Segmentation and Labeling, Motion Primitive and Context Modeling as well as Decoding. We collected several datasets to compare our proposed methods with the state-of-the-art in human motion recognition. The main contributions of this thesis are a structured functional motion decomposition and a flexible and scalable motion recognition system suitable for a Humanoid Robot
CLiFF Notes: Research In Natural Language Processing at the University of Pennsylvania
The Computational Linguistics Feedback Forum (CLIFF) is a group of students and faculty who gather once a week to discuss the members\u27 current research. As the word feedback suggests, the group\u27s purpose is the sharing of ideas. The group also promotes interdisciplinary contacts between researchers who share an interest in Cognitive Science.
There is no single theme describing the research in Natural Language Processing at Penn. There is work done in CCG, Tree adjoining grammars, intonation, statistical methods, plan inference, instruction understanding, incremental interpretation, language acquisition, syntactic parsing, causal reasoning, free word order languages, ... and many other areas. With this in mind, rather than trying to summarize the varied work currently underway here at Penn, we suggest reading the following abstracts to see how the students and faculty themselves describe their work. Their abstracts illustrate the diversity of interests among the researchers, explain the areas of common interest, and describe some very interesting work in Cognitive Science.
This report is a collection of abstracts from both faculty and graduate students in Computer Science, Psychology and Linguistics. We pride ourselves on the close working relations between these groups, as we believe that the communication among the different departments and the ongoing inter-departmental research not only improves the quality of our work, but makes much of that work possible
- …