24,988 research outputs found
Spoken content retrieval: A survey of techniques and technologies
Speech media, that is, digital audio and video containing spoken content, has blossomed in recent years. Large collections are accruing on the Internet as well as in private and enterprise settings. This growth has motivated extensive research on techniques and technologies that facilitate reliable indexing and retrieval. Spoken content retrieval (SCR) requires the combination of audio and speech processing technologies with methods from information retrieval (IR). SCR research initially investigated planned speech structured in document-like units, but has subsequently shifted focus to more informal spoken content produced spontaneously, outside of the studio and in conversational settings. This survey provides an overview of the field of SCR encompassing component technologies, the relationship of SCR to text IR and automatic speech recognition and user interaction issues. It is aimed at researchers with backgrounds in speech technology or IR who are seeking deeper insight on how these fields are integrated to support research and development, thus addressing the core challenges of SCR
Recommended from our members
A corpus-based analysis of route instructions in human-robot interaction
This paper investigates how users employ spatial descriptions to navigate a speech-enabled robot. We created a simulated environment in which users gave route instructions in a dialogic real-time interaction with a robot, which was
operated by naĂŻve participants. The ability of robot monitoring was also manipulated in two experimental conditions. The results provide evidence that the content of the instructions and strategies of the users vary depending on the conditions and
demands of the interaction. As expected, the route instructions frequently were underspecified and arbitrary. The findings of
this study elucidate the complexity in interpreting spatial language in HRI. However, they also point to the need for
endowing mobile robots with richer dialogue resources to compensate for the uncertainties arising from language as well
as the environment
Do (and say) as I say: Linguistic adaptation in human-computer dialogs
© Theodora Koulouri, Stanislao Lauria, and Robert D. Macredie. This article has been made available through the Brunel Open Access Publishing Fund.There is strong research evidence showing that people naturally align to each otherâs vocabulary, sentence structure, and acoustic features in dialog, yet little is known about how the alignment mechanism operates in the interaction between users and computer systems let alone how it may be exploited to improve the efficiency of the interaction. This article provides an account of lexical alignment in humanâcomputer dialogs, based on empirical data collected in a simulated humanâcomputer interaction scenario. The results indicate that alignment is present, resulting in the gradual reduction and stabilization of the vocabulary-in-use, and that it is also reciprocal. Further, the results suggest that when system and user errors occur, the development of alignment is temporarily disrupted and users tend to introduce novel words to the dialog. The results also indicate that alignment in humanâcomputer interaction may have a strong strategic component and is used as a resource to compensate for less optimal (visually impoverished) interaction conditions. Moreover, lower alignment is associated with less successful interaction, as measured by user perceptions. The article distills the results of the study into design recommendations for humanâcomputer dialog systems and uses them to outline a model of dialog management that supports and exploits alignment through mechanisms for in-use adaptation of the systemâs grammar and lexicon
Evaluating Competing Agent Strategies for a Voice Email Agent
This paper reports experimental results comparing a mixed-initiative to a
system-initiative dialog strategy in the context of a personal voice email
agent. To independently test the effects of dialog strategy and user expertise,
users interact with either the system-initiative or the mixed-initiative agent
to perform three successive tasks which are identical for both agents. We
report performance comparisons across agent strategies as well as over tasks.
This evaluation utilizes and tests the PARADISE evaluation framework, and
discusses the performance function derivable from the experimental data.Comment: 6 pages latex, uses icassp91.sty, psfi
- âŠ