Mechatronics & the cloud

Conventionally, the engineering design process has assumed that the design team is able to exercise control over all elements of the design, either directly or indirectly in the case of sub-systems through their specifications. The introduction of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) and the Internet of Things (IoT) means that a design team’s ability to have control over all elements of a system is no longer the case, particularly as the actual system configuration may well be being dynamically reconfigured in real-time according to user (and vendor) context and need. Additionally, the integration of the Internet of Things with elements of Big Data means that information becomes a commodity to be autonomously traded by and between systems, again according to context and need, all of which has implications for the privacy of system users. The paper therefore considers the relationship between mechatronics and cloud-basedtechnologies in relation to issues such as the distribution of functionality and user privacy

Cross-disciplinary lessons for the future internet

There are many societal concerns that emerge as a consequence of Future Internet (FI) research and development. A survey identified six key social and economic issues deemed most relevant to European FI projects. During a SESERV-organized workshop, experts in Future Internet technology engaged with social scientists (including economists), policy experts and other stakeholders in analyzing the socio-economic barriers and challenges that affect the Future Internet, and conversely, how the Future Internet will affect society, government, and business. The workshop aimed to bridge the gap between those who study and those who build the Internet. This chapter describes the socio-economic barriers seen by the community itself related to the Future Internet and suggests their resolution, as well as investigating how relevant the EU Digital Agenda is to Future Internet technologists

Edge-centric Optimization of Multi-modal ML-driven eHealth Applications

Smart eHealth applications deliver personalized and preventive digital healthcare services to clients through remote sensing, continuous monitoring, and data analytics. Smart eHealth applications sense input data from multiple modalities, transmit the data to edge and/or cloud nodes, and process the data with compute intensive machine learning (ML) algorithms. Run-time variations with continuous stream of noisy input data, unreliable network connection, computational requirements of ML algorithms, and choice of compute placement among sensor-edge-cloud layers affect the efficiency of ML-driven eHealth applications. In this chapter, we present edge-centric techniques for optimized compute placement, exploration of accuracy-performance trade-offs, and cross-layered sense-compute co-optimization for ML-driven eHealth applications. We demonstrate the practical use cases of smart eHealth applications in everyday settings, through a sensor-edge-cloud framework for an objective pain assessment case study

Ubiquitous healthcare profile management applying smart card technology

Nowadays, the patient-centric healthcare approach is focused on ubiquitous healthcare services. Furthermore, the adoption of cloud computing technology leads to more efficient ubiquitous healthcare systems. Moreover, the personalization of the delivery of ubiquitous healthcare services is enabled with the introduction of user profiles. In this paper, we propose five generic healthcare profile structures corresponding to the main categories of the participating entities included in a typical ubiquitous healthcare system in a cloud computing environment. In addition, we propose a profile management system incorporating smart card technology to increase its efficiency and the quality of the provided services of the ubiquitous healthcare system

Providing security and fault tolerance in P2P connections between clouds for mHealth services

[EN] The mobile health (mHealth) and electronic health (eHealth) systems are useful to maintain a correct administration of health information and services. However, it is mandatory to ensure a secure data transmission and in case of a node failure, the system should not fall down. This fact is important because several vital systems could depend on this infrastructure. On the other hand, a cloud does not have infinite computational and storage resources in its infrastructure or would not provide all type of services. For this reason, it is important to establish an interrelation between clouds using communication protocols in order to provide scalability, efficiency, higher service availability and flexibility which allow the use of services, computing and storage resources of other clouds. In this paper, we propose the architecture and its secure protocol that allows exchanging information, data, services, computing and storage resources between all interconnected mHealth clouds. The system is based on a hierarchic architecture of two layers composed by nodes with different roles. The routing algorithm used to establish the connectivity between the nodes is the shortest path first (SPF), but it can be easily changed by any other one. Our architecture is highly scalable and allows adding new nodes and mHealth clouds easily, while it tries to maintain the load of the cloud balanced. Our protocol design includes node discovery, authentication and fault tolerance. We show the protocol operation and the secure system design. Finally we provide the performance results in a controlled test bench.Lloret, J.; Sendra, S.; Jimenez, JM.; Parra-Boronat, L. (2016). Providing security and fault tolerance in P2P connections between clouds for mHealth services. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications. 9(5):876-893. doi:10.1007/s12083-015-0378-3S87689395The Fifty-eighth World Health Assembly, Resolutions and Decisions. Document: A58/21. Available at: http://www.who.int/healthacademy/media/WHA58-28-en.pdf . [Last access: Dec. 30, 2014]World Health organization. Topics of eHealth. In WHO website. Available at: http://www.who.int/topics/eHealth/en/ . [Last access: Dec. 30, 2014]Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ (2011) Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 343:d3805Promotional Material Digital health: working in partnership. Department of Health. UK. (2014) Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-health-working-in-partnership/digital-health-working-in-partnerships#digital-health---harnessing-technology-for-patient-benefit . [Last access: Dec. 30, 2014]eHealth for a Healthier Europe!– opportunities for a better use of healthcare resources. Available at: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files_epractice/sites/eHealth%20for%20a%20Healthier%20Europe %20-%20Opportunities%20for%20a%20better%20use%20of%20healthcare%20resources.pdf. [Last access: Dec. 30, 2014]Adibi S (2012) Link technologies and BlackBerry mobile health (mHealth) solutions: a review. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(4):586–597Chiarini G, Ray P, Akter S, Masella C, Ganz A (2013) mHealth technologies for chronic diseases and elders: a systematic review. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 31(9):6–18Lopes IM, Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, Lloret J, Proenca ML (2011) A mobile health monitoring solution for weight control. In proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP 2011), Nanjing, pp 1–5Lopes IM, Silva BM, Rodrigues JJPC, Lloret J (2012) Performance evaluation of cooperation mechanisms for m-health applications. In proceedings of the 2012 I.E. Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2012), AnaheimKyriacou EC, Pattichis CS, Pattichis MS (2009) An overview of recent health care support systems for eEmergency and mHealth applications. In proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2009), Hilton Minneapolis, pp 1246–1249Nkosi MT, Mekuria F (2010) Cloud computing for enhanced mobile health applications. In proceedings of the 2010 I.E. Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom 2010), Indianapolis, pp 629–633Sultan N (2014) Making use of cloud computing for healthcare provision: opportunities and challenges. Int J Inf Manag 34(2):177–184Pandey S, Voorsluys W, Niu S, Khandoker A, Buyya R (2012) An autonomic cloud environment for hosting ECG data analysis services. Futur Gener Comput Syst 28(1):147–154Xia H, Asif I, Zhao X (2013) Cloud-ECG for real time ECG monitoring and analysis. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 110(3):253–259Bourouis A, Feham M, Bouchachia A (2012) A new architecture of a ubiquitous health monitoring system: a prototype of cloud mobile health monitoring system. arXiv preprint. Reference: arXiv:1205.6910Chen KR, Lin YL, Huang MS (2011) A mobile biomedical device by novel antenna technology for cloud computing resource toward pervasive healthcare. In proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE 2011), Taichung, pp 133–136Lacuesta R, Lloret J, Sendra S, Peñalver L (2014), Spontaneous ad hoc mobile cloud computing network. Sci World J (Article ID 232419): 1–19Ghafoor KZ, Bakar KA, Mohammed MA, Lloret J (2013) Vehicular cloud computing: trends and challenges (Chapter 14). In Mobile Networks and Cloud computing Convergence for Progressive Services and Applications. IGI Global. pp. 262–274. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4781-7.ch014Wan J, Zhang D, Zhao S, Yang LT, Lloret J (2014) Context-aware vehicular cyber-physical systems with cloud support: architecture, challenges and solutions. IEEE Commun Mag 52(8):106–113. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6871677Rodrigues JJPC, Zhou L, Mendes LDP, Lin K, Lloret J (2012) Distributed media-aware flow scheduling in cloud computing environment. Comput Commun 35(15):1819–1827Dutta R, Annappa B (2014) Protection of data in unsecured public cloud environment with open, vulnerable networks using threshold-based secret sharing. Netw Protoc Algoritm 6(1):58–75Modares H, Lloret J, Moravejosharieh A, Salleh R (2013) Security in mobile cloud computing (Chapter 5). In Mobile Networks and Cloud computing Convergence for Progressive Services and Applications. IGI Global. pp. 79–91Mehmood A, Song H, Lloret J (2014) Multi-agent based framework for secure and reliable communication among open clouds. Netw Protoc Algoritm 6(4):60–76Mendes LDP, Rodrigues JJPC, Lloret J, Sendra S (2014) Cross-layer dynamic admission control for cloud-based multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Syst J 8(1):235–246Xiong J, Li F, Ma J, Liu X, Yao Z, Chen PS (2014) A full lifecycle privacy protection scheme for sensitive data in cloud computing. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 1–13Yang H, Kim H, Mtonga K (2014) An efficient privacy-preserving authentication scheme with adaptive key evolution in remote health monitoring system. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 1–11Silva BM, Rodrigues JJ, Canelo F, Lopes IM, Lloret J (2014) Towards a cooperative security system for mobile-health applications. Electron Commer Re 1–27Flynn D, Gregory P, Makki H, Gabbay M (2009) Expectations and experiences of eHealth in primary care: a qualitative practice-based investigation. Int J Med Inform 78(9):588–604Thampi SM (2010) Survey of search and replication schemes in unstructured P2P networks. Netw Protoc Algoritm 2(1):93–131Khan SM, Mallesh N, Nambiar A, Wright M (2010) The dynamics of salsa: a robust structured P2P system. Netw Protoc Algoritm 2(4):40–60Garcia M, Hammoumi M, Canovas A, Lloret J (2011) Controlling P2P file-sharing networks’ traffic. Netw Protoc Algoritm 3(4):54–92Lloret J, Garcia M, Tomas J, Rodrigues JJPC (2014) Architecture and protocol for InterCloud communication. Inf Sci 258:434–451Chowdhury CR (2014) A survey of cloud based health care system. Int J Innov Res Comput Commun Eng 2(8):5477–5481Ghosh R, Papapanagiotou I, Boloor KA (2014) Survey on research initiatives for healthcare clouds. Cloud Computing Applications for Quality Health Care Delivery. IGI Global 1–18Donahue S (2010) Can cloud computing help fix health care? Cloudbook J 1(6):1–6Deng M, Petkovic M, Nalin M, Baroni IA (2011) Home healthcare system in the cloud--addressing security and privacy challenges. In proceedings of the 2011 I.E. International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD 2011), Washington, pp 549–556Wang X, Gui Q, Liu B, Chen Y, Jin Z (2013) Leveraging mobile cloud for telemedicine: a performance study in medical monitoring. In proceedings of the 39th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference (NEBEC 2013), Syracuse, pp 49–50Alamri A (2012) Cloud-based e-health multimedia framework for heterogeneous network. In proceedings of the 2012 I.E. International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW 2012), Melbourne, pp 447–452Constantinescu L, Kim J, Feng DD (2012) Sparkmed: a framework for dynamic integration of multimedia medical data into distributed m-health systems. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(1):40–52Botts N, Thoms B, Noamani A, Horan TA (2010) Cloud computing architectures for the underserved: public health cyberinfrastructures through a network of healthatms. In proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2010), Honolulu, pp 1–10Fan L, Buchanan W, Thummler C, Lo O, Khedim A, Uthmani O, Lawson A, Bell D (2011) DACAR platform for eHealth services cloud. In proceedings of the 2011 I.E. International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD 2011), Washington, pp 219–226Ruiz-Zafra A, Benghazi K, Noguera M, Garrido JL (2013) Zappa: An Open Mobile Platform to Build Cloud-Based m-Health Systems. In proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (ISAmI 2013), Salamanca, pp 87–94Nijon S, Dickerson RF, Asare P, Li Q, Hong D, Stankovic JA, Hu P, Shen G, Jiang X (2013) Auditeur: a mobile-cloud service platform for acoustic event detection on smartphones. In Proceeding of the 11th annual international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. ACM, Taipei, pp 403–416Lloret J, Diaz JR, Boronat F, Jiménez JM (2006) A fault-tolerant P2P-based protocol for logical networks interconnection. In proceedings of the International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS’06), Silicon ValleyLloret J, Palau C, Boronat F, Tomas J (2008) Improving networks using group-based topologies. Comput Commun 31(14):3438–3450Lloret J, Boronat Segui F, Palau C, Esteve M (2005) Two levels SPF-based system to interconnect partially decentralized P2P file sharing networks. In proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems and International Conference on Networking and Services.(ICAS-ICNS 2005), Papeete, p 39Cramer C, Kutzner K, Fuhrmann T (2004) Bootstrapping locality-aware P2P networkS. In proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON 2004), Singapore, pp 357–361FIPS 180-1 - Secure Hash Standard, SHA-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip180-1.htm [Last access: Dec. 30, 2014]Eastlake D., Jones P., US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1),(2001). In IETF website, Available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3174.txt [Last access: March 20, 2015]Lacuesta R, Lloret J, Garcia M, Peñalver L (2011) Two secure and energy-saving spontaneous Ad-Hoc protocol for wireless mesh client networks. J Netw Comput Appl 3(2):492–50

Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth:Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare

Internet of Things (IoT) offers a seamless platform to connect people and objects to one another for enriching and making our lives easier. This vision carries us from compute-based centralized schemes to a more distributed environment offering a vast amount of applications such as smart wearables, smart home, smart mobility, and smart cities. In this paper we discuss applicability of IoT in healthcare and medicine by presenting a holistic architecture of IoT eHealth ecosystem. Healthcare is becoming increasingly difficult to manage due to insufficient and less effective healthcare services to meet the increasing demands of rising aging population with chronic diseases. We propose that this requires a transition from the clinic-centric treatment to patient-centric healthcare where each agent such as hospital, patient, and services are seamlessly connected to each other. This patient-centric IoT eHealth ecosystem needs a multi-layer architecture: (1) device, (2) fog computing and (3) cloud to empower handling of complex data in terms of its variety, speed, and latency. This fog-driven IoT architecture is followed by various case examples of services and applications that are implemented on those layers. Those examples range from mobile health, assisted living, e-medicine, implants, early warning systems, to population monitoring in smart cities. We then finally address the challenges of IoT eHealth such as data management, scalability, regulations, interoperability, device–network–human interfaces, security, and privacy

Reporting an Experience on Design and Implementation of e-Health Systems on Azure Cloud

Electronic Health (e-Health) technology has brought the world with significant transformation from traditional paper-based medical practice to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)-based systems for automatic management (storage, processing, and archiving) of information. Traditionally e-Health systems have been designed to operate within stovepipes on dedicated networks, physical computers, and locally managed software platforms that make it susceptible to many serious limitations including: 1) lack of on-demand scalability during critical situations; 2) high administrative overheads and costs; and 3) in-efficient resource utilization and energy consumption due to lack of automation. In this paper, we present an approach to migrate the ICT systems in the e-Health sector from traditional in-house Client/Server (C/S) architecture to the virtualised cloud computing environment. To this end, we developed two cloud-based e-Health applications (Medical Practice Management System and Telemedicine Practice System) for demonstrating how cloud services can be leveraged for developing and deploying such applications. The Windows Azure cloud computing platform is selected as an example public cloud platform for our study. We conducted several performance evaluation experiments to understand the Quality Service (QoS) tradeoffs of our applications under variable workload on Azure.Comment: Submitted to third IEEE International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing (CGC 2013

A patient agent controlled customized blockchain based framework for internet of things

Although Blockchain implementations have emerged as revolutionary technologies for various industrial applications including cryptocurrencies, they have not been widely deployed to store data streaming from sensors to remote servers in architectures known as Internet of Things. New Blockchain for the Internet of Things models promise secure solutions for eHealth, smart cities, and other applications. These models pave the way for continuous monitoring of patient’s physiological signs with wearable sensors to augment traditional medical practice without recourse to storing data with a trusted authority. However, existing Blockchain algorithms cannot accommodate the huge volumes, security, and privacy requirements of health data. In this thesis, our first contribution is an End-to-End secure eHealth architecture that introduces an intelligent Patient Centric Agent. The Patient Centric Agent executing on dedicated hardware manages the storage and access of streams of sensors generated health data, into a customized Blockchain and other less secure repositories. As IoT devices cannot host Blockchain technology due to their limited memory, power, and computational resources, the Patient Centric Agent coordinates and communicates with a private customized Blockchain on behalf of the wearable devices. While the adoption of a Patient Centric Agent offers solutions for addressing continuous monitoring of patients’ health, dealing with storage, data privacy and network security issues, the architecture is vulnerable to Denial of Services(DoS) and single point of failure attacks. To address this issue, we advance a second contribution; a decentralised eHealth system in which the Patient Centric Agent is replicated at three levels: Sensing Layer, NEAR Processing Layer and FAR Processing Layer. The functionalities of the Patient Centric Agent are customized to manage the tasks of the three levels. Simulations confirm protection of the architecture against DoS attacks. Few patients require all their health data to be stored in Blockchain repositories but instead need to select an appropriate storage medium for each chunk of data by matching their personal needs and preferences with features of candidate storage mediums. Motivated by this context, we advance third contribution; a recommendation model for health data storage that can accommodate patient preferences and make storage decisions rapidly, in real-time, even with streamed data. The mapping between health data features and characteristics of each repository is learned using machine learning. The Blockchain’s capacity to make transactions and store records without central oversight enables its application for IoT networks outside health such as underwater IoT networks where the unattended nature of the nodes threatens their security and privacy. However, underwater IoT differs from ground IoT as acoustics signals are the communication media leading to high propagation delays, high error rates exacerbated by turbulent water currents. Our fourth contribution is a customized Blockchain leveraged framework with the model of Patient-Centric Agent renamed as Smart Agent for securely monitoring underwater IoT. Finally, the smart Agent has been investigated in developing an IoT smart home or cities monitoring framework. The key algorithms underpinning to each contribution have been implemented and analysed using simulators.Doctor of Philosoph