10,855 research outputs found
Uncertainty And Evolutionary Optimization: A Novel Approach
Evolutionary algorithms (EA) have been widely accepted as efficient solvers
for complex real world optimization problems, including engineering
optimization. However, real world optimization problems often involve uncertain
environment including noisy and/or dynamic environments, which pose major
challenges to EA-based optimization. The presence of noise interferes with the
evaluation and the selection process of EA, and thus adversely affects its
performance. In addition, as presence of noise poses challenges to the
evaluation of the fitness function, it may need to be estimated instead of
being evaluated. Several existing approaches attempt to address this problem,
such as introduction of diversity (hyper mutation, random immigrants, special
operators) or incorporation of memory of the past (diploidy, case based
memory). However, these approaches fail to adequately address the problem. In
this paper we propose a Distributed Population Switching Evolutionary Algorithm
(DPSEA) method that addresses optimization of functions with noisy fitness
using a distributed population switching architecture, to simulate a
distributed self-adaptive memory of the solution space. Local regression is
used in the pseudo-populations to estimate the fitness. Successful applications
to benchmark test problems ascertain the proposed method's superior performance
in terms of both robustness and accuracy.Comment: In Proceedings of the The 9th IEEE Conference on Industrial
Electronics and Applications (ICIEA 2014), IEEE Press, pp. 988-983, 201
Increasing the density of available pareto optimal solutions
The set of available multi-objective optimization
algorithms continues to grow. This fact can be partially attributed to their widespread use and applicability. However this increase also suggests several issues remain to be addressed satisfactorily. One such issue is the diversity and the number of solutions available to the decision maker (DM). Even for algorithms very well suited for a particular problem, it is difficult - mainly due
to the computational cost - to use a population large enough
to ensure the likelihood of obtaining a solution close to the DMs preferences. In this paper we present a novel methodology that produces additional Pareto optimal solutions from a Pareto optimal set obtained at the end run of any multi-objective optimization algorithm. This method, which we refer to as Pareto estimation, is tested against a set of 2 and 3-objective test problems and a 3-objective portfolio optimization problem to illustrate itsā utility for a real-world problem
Scalarizing Functions in Bayesian Multiobjective Optimization
Scalarizing functions have been widely used to convert a multiobjective
optimization problem into a single objective optimization problem. However,
their use in solving (computationally) expensive multi- and many-objective
optimization problems in Bayesian multiobjective optimization is scarce.
Scalarizing functions can play a crucial role on the quality and number of
evaluations required when doing the optimization. In this article, we study and
review 15 different scalarizing functions in the framework of Bayesian
multiobjective optimization and build Gaussian process models (as surrogates,
metamodels or emulators) on them. We use expected improvement as infill
criterion (or acquisition function) to update the models. In particular, we
compare different scalarizing functions and analyze their performance on
several benchmark problems with different number of objectives to be optimized.
The review and experiments on different functions provide useful insights when
using and selecting a scalarizing function when using a Bayesian multiobjective
optimization method
Multi-objective worst case optimization by means of evolutionary algorithms
Many real-world optimization problems are subject to uncertainty. A possible goal is then to find a solution which is robust in the sense that it has the best worst-case performance over all possible scenarios. However, if the problem also involves mul- tiple objectives, which scenario is ābestā or āworstā depends on the userās weighting of the different criteria, which is generally difficult to specify before alternatives are known. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization avoids this problem by searching for the whole front of Pareto optimal solutions. This paper extends the concept of Pareto dominance to worst case optimization problems and demonstrates how evolu- tionary algorithms can be used for worst case optimization in a multi-objective setting
- ā¦