Virtualization: an old concept in a new approach

Virtualization technology is transforming today’s IT community, offering new possi-bilities to improve the performance and efficiency of IT infrastructure by a dynamic mapping of the PC resources, enabling to run multiple applications and operating systems on a single physical system. Virtualization also offers high availability and error recovery solutions by encapsulating entire systems into single files that can be replicated and restored on any desti-nation machine. This paper brings new elements related to the concept of virtualization, presenting the princi-ples, the new architectures and the advantages of the virtualization. We make also a brief comparison between the PC’s functional structure before and after the virtualization. Finally, we present licensed software to create and run multiple virtual machines on a personal com-puter

The Virtual Block Interface: A Flexible Alternative to the Conventional Virtual Memory Framework

Computers continue to diversify with respect to system designs, emerging memory technologies, and application memory demands. Unfortunately, continually adapting the conventional virtual memory framework to each possible system configuration is challenging, and often results in performance loss or requires non-trivial workarounds. To address these challenges, we propose a new virtual memory framework, the Virtual Block Interface (VBI). We design VBI based on the key idea that delegating memory management duties to hardware can reduce the overheads and software complexity associated with virtual memory. VBI introduces a set of variable-sized virtual blocks (VBs) to applications. Each VB is a contiguous region of the globally-visible VBI address space, and an application can allocate each semantically meaningful unit of information (e.g., a data structure) in a separate VB. VBI decouples access protection from memory allocation and address translation. While the OS controls which programs have access to which VBs, dedicated hardware in the memory controller manages the physical memory allocation and address translation of the VBs. This approach enables several architectural optimizations to (1) efficiently and flexibly cater to different and increasingly diverse system configurations, and (2) eliminate key inefficiencies of conventional virtual memory. We demonstrate the benefits of VBI with two important use cases: (1) reducing the overheads of address translation (for both native execution and virtual machine environments), as VBI reduces the number of translation requests and associated memory accesses; and (2) two heterogeneous main memory architectures, where VBI increases the effectiveness of managing fast memory regions. For both cases, VBI significanttly improves performance over conventional virtual memory

The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Software and Architectural Support for ARM Virtualization

The ARM architecture is dominating in the mobile and embedded markets and is making an upwards push into the server and networking markets where virtualization is a key technology. Similar to x86, ARM has added hardware support for virtualization, but there are important differences between the ARM and x86 architectural designs. Given two widely deployed computer architectures with different approaches to hardware virtualization support, we can evaluate, in practice, benefits and drawbacks of different approaches to architectural support for virtualization. This dissertation explores new approaches to combining software and architectural support for virtualization with a focus on the ARM architecture and shows that it is possible to provide virtualization services an order of magnitude more efficiently than traditional implementations. First, we investigate why the ARM architecture does not meet the classical requirements for virtualizable architectures and present an early prototype of KVM for ARM, a hypervisor using lightweight paravirtualization to run VMs on ARM systems without hardware virtualization support. Lightweight paravirtualization is a fully automated approach which replaces sensitive instructions with privileged instructions and requires no understanding of the guest OS code. Second, we introduce split-mode virtualization to support hosted hypervisor designs using ARM's architectural support for virtualization. Different from x86, the ARM virtualization extensions are based on a new hypervisor CPU mode, separate from existing CPU modes. This separate hypervisor CPU mode does not support running existing unmodified OSes, and therefore hosted hypervisor designs, in which the hypervisor runs as part of a host OS, do not work on ARM. Split-mode virtualization splits the execution of the hypervisor such that the host OS with core hypervisor functionality runs in the existing kernel CPU mode, but a small runtime runs in the hypervisor CPU mode and supports switching between the VM and the host OS. Split-mode virtualization was used in KVM/ARM, which was designed from the ground up as an open source project and merged in the mainline Linux kernel, resulting in interesting lessons about translating research ideas into practice. Third, we present an in-depth performance study of 64-bit ARMv8 virtualization using server hardware and compare against x86. We measure the performance of both standalone and hosted hypervisors on both ARM and x86 and compare their results. We find that ARM hardware support for virtualization can enable faster transitions between the VM and the hypervisor for standalone hypervisors compared to x86, but results in high switching overheads for hosted hypervisors compared to both x86 and to standalone hypervisors on ARM. We identify a key reason for high switching overhead for hosted hypervisors being the need to save and restore kernel mode state between the host OS kernel and the VM kernel. However, standalone hypervisors such as Xen, cannot leverage their performance benefit in practice for real application workloads. Other factors related to hypervisor software design and I/O emulation play a larger role in overall hypervisor performance than low-level interactions between the hypervisor and the hardware. Fourth, realizing that modern hypervisors rely on running a full OS kernel, the hypervisor OS kernel, to support their hypervisor functionality, we present a new hypervisor design which runs the hypervisor and its hypervisor OS kernel in ARM's separate hypervisor CPU mode and avoids the need to multiplex kernel mode CPU state between the VM and the hypervisor. Our design benefits from new architectural features, the virtualization host extensions (VHE), in ARMv8.1 to avoid modifying the hypervisor OS kernel to run in the hypervisor CPU mode. We show that the hypervisor must be co-designed with the hardware features to take advantage of running in a separate CPU mode and implement our changes to KVM/ARM. We show that running the hypervisor OS kernel in a separate CPU mode from the VM and taking advantage of ARM's ability to quickly switch between the VM and hypervisor results in an order of magnitude reduction in overhead for important virtualization microbenchmarks and reduces the overhead of real application workloads by more than 50%

A Measurement Study of ARM Virtualization Performance

ARM servers are becoming increasingly common, making server technologies such as virtualization for ARM of growing importance. We present the first in-depth study of ARM virtualization performance on ARM server hardware, including measurements of two popular ARM and x86 hypervisors, KVM and Xen. We show how the ARM hardware support for virtualization can support much faster transitions between the VM and the hypervisor, a key hypervisor operation. However, current hypervisor designs, including both KVM (Type 1) and Xen (Type 2), are not able to lever- age this performance benefit in practice for real application workloads. We discuss the reasons why and show that other factors related to hypervisor software design and implementation have a larger role in overall performance than the speed of micro architectural operations. Based on our measurements, we discuss changes to ARM's hardware virtualization support that can potentially bridge the gap to bring its faster virtual machine exit mechanism to modern Type 2 hypervisors running real applications. These changes have been incorporated into the latest ARM architecture

Development of a virtualization systems architecture course for the information sciences and technologies department at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)

Virtualization is a revolutionary technology that has changed the way computing is performed in data centers. By converting traditionally siloed computing assets to shared pools of resources, virtualization provides a considerable number of advantages such as more efficient use of physical server resources, more efficient use of datacenter space, reduced energy consumption, simplified system administration, simplified backup and disaster recovery, and a host of other advantages. Due to the considerable number of advantages, companies and organizations of various sizes have either migrated their workloads to virtualized environments or are considering virtualization of their workloads. As per Gartner Magic Quadrant for x86 Server Virtualization Infrastructure 2013 , roughly two-third of x86 server workloads are virtualized [1]. The need for virtualization solutions by companies and organizations has increased the demand for qualified virtualization professionals for planning, designing, implementing, and maintaining virtualized infrastructure of different scales. Although universities are the main source for educating IT professionals, the field of information technology is so dynamic and changing so rapidly that not all universities can keep pace with the change. As a result, providing the latest technology that is being used in the information technology industry in the curriculums of universities is a big advantage for information technology universities. Taking into consideration the trend toward virtualization in computing environments and the great demand for virtualization professionals in the industry, the faculty of Information Sciences and Technologies department at RIT decided to prepare a graduate course in the master\u27s program in Networking and System Administration entitled Virtualization Systems Architecture , which better prepares students to a find a career in the field of enterprise computing. This research is composed of five chapters. It starts by briefly going through the history of computer virtualization and exploring when and why it came into existence and how it evolved. The second chapter of the research goes through the challenges in virtualization of the x86 platform architecture and the solutions used to overcome the challenges. In the third chapter, various types of hypervisors are discussed and the advantages and disadvantages of each one are discussed. In the fourth chapter, the architecture and features of the two leading virtualization solutions are explored. Then in the final chapter, the research goes through the contents of the Virtualization Systems Architecture course