4,536 research outputs found
A critical cluster analysis of 44 indicators of author-level performance
This paper explores the relationship between author-level bibliometric
indicators and the researchers the "measure", exemplified across five academic
seniorities and four disciplines. Using cluster methodology, the disciplinary
and seniority appropriateness of author-level indicators is examined.
Publication and citation data for 741 researchers across Astronomy,
Environmental Science, Philosophy and Public Health was collected in Web of
Science (WoS). Forty-four indicators of individual performance were computed
using the data. A two-step cluster analysis using IBM SPSS version 22 was
performed, followed by a risk analysis and ordinal logistic regression to
explore cluster membership. Indicator scores were contextualized using the
individual researcher's curriculum vitae. Four different clusters based on
indicator scores ranked researchers as low, middle, high and extremely high
performers. The results show that different indicators were appropriate in
demarcating ranked performance in different disciplines. In Astronomy the h2
indicator, sum pp top prop in Environmental Science, Q2 in Philosophy and
e-index in Public Health. The regression and odds analysis showed individual
level indicator scores were primarily dependent on the number of years since
the researcher's first publication registered in WoS, number of publications
and number of citations. Seniority classification was secondary therefore no
seniority appropriate indicators were confidently identified. Cluster
methodology proved useful in identifying disciplinary appropriate indicators
providing the preliminary data preparation was thorough but needed to be
supplemented by other analyses to validate the results. A general disconnection
between the performance of the researcher on their curriculum vitae and the
performance of the researcher based on bibliometric indicators was observed.Comment: 28 pages, 7 tables, 2 figures, 2 appendice
Predicting the long-term citation impact of recent publications
A fundamental problem in citation analysis is the prediction of the long-term
citation impact of recent publications. We propose a model to predict a
probability distribution for the future number of citations of a publication.
Two predictors are used: The impact factor of the journal in which a
publication has appeared and the number of citations a publication has received
one year after its appearance. The proposed model is based on quantile
regression. We employ the model to predict the future number of citations of a
large set of publications in the field of physics. Our analysis shows that both
predictors (i.e., impact factor and early citations) contribute to the accurate
prediction of long-term citation impact. We also analytically study the
behavior of the quantile regression coefficients for high quantiles of the
distribution of citations. This is done by linking the quantile regression
approach to a quantile estimation technique from extreme value theory. Our work
provides insight into the influence of the impact factor and early citations on
the long-term citation impact of a publication, and it takes a step toward a
methodology that can be used to assess research institutions based on their
most recently published work.Comment: 17 pages, 17 figure
Factors predicting the scientific wealth of nations
It has been repeatedly demonstrated that economic affluence is one of the main predictors of the scientific wealth of nations. Yet, the link is not as straightforward as is often presented. First, only a limited set of relatively affluent countries is usually studied. Second, there are differences between equally rich countries in their scientific success. The main aim of the present study is to find out which factors can enhance or suppress the effect of the economic wealth of countries on their scientific success, as measured by the High Quality Science Index (HQSI). The HQSI is a composite indicator of scientific wealth, which in equal parts considers the mean citation rate per paper and the percentage of papers that have reached the top 1% of citations in the Essential Science Indicators (ESI; Clarivate Analytics) database during the 11-year period from 2008 to 2018. Our results show that a high position in the ranking of countries on the HQSI can be achieved not only by increasing the number of high-quality papers but also by reducing the number of papers that are able to pass ESI thresholds but are of lower quality. The HQSI was positively and significantly correlated with the countriesâ economic indicators (as measured by gross national income and Research and Development expenditure as a percentage from GDP), but these correlations became insignificant when other societal factors were controlled for. Overall, our findings indicate that it is small and well-governed countries with a long-standing democratic past that seem to be more efficient in translating economic wealth into high-quality science
A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators
An increasing demand for bibliometric assessment of individuals has led to a
growth of new bibliometric indicators as well as new variants or combinations
of established ones. The aim of this review is to contribute with objective
facts about the usefulness of bibliometric indicators of the effects of
publication activity at the individual level. This paper reviews 108 indicators
that can potentially be used to measure performance on the individual author
level, and examines the complexity of their calculations in relation to what
they are supposed to reflect and ease of end-user application.Comment: to be published in Scientometrics, 201
Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics
This bibliometric study of a large publication set dealing with research on
climate change aims at mapping the relevant literature from a bibliometric
perspective and presents a multitude of quantitative data: (1) The growth of
the overall publication output as well as (2) of some major subfields, (3) the
contributing journals and countries as well as their citation impact, and (4) a
title word analysis aiming to illustrate the time evolution and relative
importance of specific research topics. The study is based on 222,060 papers
published between 1980 and 2014. The total number of papers shows a strong
increase with a doubling every 5-6 years. Continental biomass related research
is the major subfield, closely followed by climate modeling. Research dealing
with adaptation, mitigation, risks, and vulnerability of global warming is
comparatively small, but their share of papers increased exponentially since
2005. Research on vulnerability and on adaptation published the largest
proportion of very important papers. Research on climate change is
quantitatively dominated by the USA, followed by the UK, Germany, and Canada.
The citation-based indicators exhibit consistently that the UK has produced the
largest proportion of high impact papers compared to the other countries
(having published more than 10,000 papers). The title word analysis shows that
the term climate change comes forward with time. Furthermore, the term impact
arises and points to research dealing with the various effects of climate
change. Finally, the term model and related terms prominently appear
independent of time, indicating the high relevance of climate modeling.Comment: 40 pages, 6 figures, and 4 table
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Scientometrics is the study of the quantitative aspects of the process of science as a communication system. It is centrally, but not only, concerned with the analysis of citations in the academic literature. In recent years it has come to play a major role in the measurement and evaluation of research performance. In this review we consider: the historical development of scientometrics, sources of citation data, citation metrics and the âlaws" of scientometrics, normalisation, journal impact factors and other journal metrics, visualising and mapping science, evaluation and policy, and future developments
- âŠ