A hybrid deep learning approach for texture analysis

Texture classification is a problem that has various applications such as remote sensing and forest species recognition. Solutions tend to be custom fit to the dataset used but fails to generalize. The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) in combination with Support Vector Machine (SVM) form a robust selection between powerful invariant feature extractor and accurate classifier. The fusion of classifiers shows the stability of classification among different datasets and slight improvement compared to state of the art methods. The classifiers are fused using confusion matrix after independent training of each using the same training set, then put to test. Statistical information about each classifier is fed to a confusion matrix that generates two confidence measures used in building two binary classifiers. The binary classifier is allowed to activate or deactivate a classifier during testing time based on a confidence measure obtained from the confusion matrix. The method obtained results approaching state of the art with a difference less than 1% in classification success rates. Moreover, the method was able to maintain this success rate among different datasets while other methods had failed to obtain similar stability. Two datasets had been used in this research Brodatz and Kylberg where the results came 98.17% and 99.70%. In comparison to conventional methods in the literature, it came as 98.9% and 99.64% respectively

Dynamic Bayesian Combination of Multiple Imperfect Classifiers

Classifier combination methods need to make best use of the outputs of multiple, imperfect classifiers to enable higher accuracy classifications. In many situations, such as when human decisions need to be combined, the base decisions can vary enormously in reliability. A Bayesian approach to such uncertain combination allows us to infer the differences in performance between individuals and to incorporate any available prior knowledge about their abilities when training data is sparse. In this paper we explore Bayesian classifier combination, using the computationally efficient framework of variational Bayesian inference. We apply the approach to real data from a large citizen science project, Galaxy Zoo Supernovae, and show that our method far outperforms other established approaches to imperfect decision combination. We go on to analyse the putative community structure of the decision makers, based on their inferred decision making strategies, and show that natural groupings are formed. Finally we present a dynamic Bayesian classifier combination approach and investigate the changes in base classifier performance over time.Comment: 35 pages, 12 figure

Evaluation of Performance Measures for Classifiers Comparison

The selection of the best classification algorithm for a given dataset is a very widespread problem, occuring each time one has to choose a classifier to solve a real-world problem. It is also a complex task with many important methodological decisions to make. Among those, one of the most crucial is the choice of an appropriate measure in order to properly assess the classification performance and rank the algorithms. In this article, we focus on this specific task. We present the most popular measures and compare their behavior through discrimination plots. We then discuss their properties from a more theoretical perspective. It turns out several of them are equivalent for classifiers comparison purposes. Futhermore. they can also lead to interpretation problems. Among the numerous measures proposed over the years, it appears that the classical overall success rate and marginal rates are the more suitable for classifier comparison task

Features for the classification and clustering of music in symbolic format

Tese de mestrado, Engenharia Informática, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, 2008Este documento descreve o trabalho realizado no âmbito da disciplina de Projecto em Engenharia Informática do Mestrado em Engenharia Informática da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa. Recuperação de Informação Musical é, hoje em dia, um ramo altamente activo de investigação e desenvolvimento na área de ciência da computação, e incide em diversos tópicos, incluindo a classificação musical por géneros. O trabalho apresentado centra-se na Classificação de Pistas e de Géneros de música armazenada usando o formato MIDI. Para resolver o problema da classificação de pistas MIDI, extraimos um conjunto de descritores que são usados para treinar um classificador implementado através de uma técnica de Máquinas de Aprendizagem, Redes Neuronais, com base nas notas, e durações destas, que descrevem cada faixa. As faixas são classificadas em seis categorias: Melody (Melodia), Harmony (Harmonia), Bass (Baixo) e Drums (Bateria). Para caracterizar o conteúdo musical de cada faixa, um vector de descritores numérico, normalmente conhecido como ”shallow structure description”, é extraído. Em seguida, eles são utilizados no classificador — Neural Network — que foi implementado no ambiente Matlab. Na Classificação por Géneros, duas propostas foram usadas: Modelação de Linguagem, na qual uma matriz de transição de probabilidades é criada para cada tipo de pista midi (Melodia, Harmonia, Baixo e Bateria) e também para cada género; e Redes Neuronais, em que um vector de descritores numéricos é extraído de cada pista, e é processado num Classificador baseado numa Rede Neuronal. Seis Colectâneas de Musica no formato Midi, de seis géneros diferentes, Blues, Country, Jazz, Metal, Punk e Rock, foram formadas para efectuar as experiências. Estes géneros foram escolhidos por partilharem os mesmos instrumentos, na sua maioria, como por exemplo, baixo, bateria, piano ou guitarra. Estes géneros também partilham algumas características entre si, para que a classificação não seja trivial, e para que a robustez dos classificadores seja testada. As experiências de Classificação de Pistas Midi, nas quais foram testados, numa primeira abordagem, todos os descritores, e numa segunda abordagem, os melhores descritores, mostrando que o uso de todos os descritores é uma abordagem errada, uma vez que existem descritores que confundem o classificador. Provou-se que a melhor maneira, neste contexto, de se classificar estas faixas MIDI é utilizar descritores cuidadosamente seleccionados. As experiências de Classificação por Géneros, mostraram que os Classificadores por Instrumentos (Single-Instrument) obtiveram os melhores resultados. Quatro géneros, Jazz, Country, Metal e Punk, obtiveram resultados de classificação com sucesso acima dos 80% O trabalho futuro inclui: algoritmos genéticos para a selecção de melhores descritores; estruturar pistas e musicas; fundir todos os classificadores desenvolvidos num único classificador.This document describes the work carried out under the discipline of Computing Engineering Project of the Computer Engineering Master, Sciences Faculty of the Lisbon University. Music Information Retrieval is, nowadays, a highly active branch of research and development in the computer science field, and focuses several topics, including music genre classification. The work presented in this paper focus on Track and Genre Classification of music stored using MIDI format, To address the problem of MIDI track classification, we extract a set of descriptors that are used to train a classifier implemented by a Neural Network, based on the pitch levels and durations that describe each track. Tracks are classified into four classes: Melody, Harmony, Bass and Drums. In order to characterize the musical content from each track, a vector of numeric descriptors, normally known as shallow structure description, is extracted. Then they are used as inputs for the classifier which was implemented in the Matlab environment. In the Genre Classification task, two approaches are used: Language Modeling, in which a transition probabilities matrix is created for each type of track (Melody, Harmony, Bass and Drums) and also for each genre; and an approach based on Neural Networks, where a vector of numeric descriptors is extracted from each track (Melody, Harmony, Bass and Drums) and fed to a Neural Network Classifier. Six MIDI Music Corpora were assembled for the experiments, from six different genres, Blues, Country, Jazz, Metal, Punk and Rock. These genres were selected because all of them have the same base instruments, such as bass, drums, piano or guitar. Also, the genres chosen share some characteristics between them, so that the classification isn’t trivial, and tests the classifiers robustness. Track Classification experiments using all descriptors and best descriptors were made, showing that using all descriptors is a wrong approach, as there are descriptors which confuse the classifier. Using carefully selected descriptors proved to be the best way to classify these MIDI tracks. Genre Classification experiments showed that the Single-Instrument Classifiers achieved the best results. Four genres achieved higher than 80% success rates: Jazz, Country, Metal and Punk. Future work includes: genetic algorithms; structurize tracks and songs; merge all presented classifiers into one full Automatic Genre Classification System

An Overview of Classifier Fusion Methods

A number of classifier fusion methods have been recently developed opening an alternative approach leading to a potential improvement in the classification performance. As there is little theory of information fusion itself, currently we are faced with different methods designed for different problems and producing different results. This paper gives an overview of classifier fusion methods and attempts to identify new trends that may dominate this area of research in future. A taxonomy of fusion methods trying to bring some order into the existing “pudding of diversities” is also provided

Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification.

This paper investigates the correlation between features of three types (visual, stylistic and topical types) and genre classes. The majority of previous studies in automated genre classification have created models based on an amalgamated representation of a document using a combination of features. In these models, the inseparable roles of different features make it difficult to determine a means of improving the classifier when it exhibits poor performance in detecting selected genres. In this paper we use classifiers independently modeled on three groups of features to examine six genre classes to show that the strongest features for making one classification is not necessarily the best features for carrying out another classification.

Accuracy Measures for the Comparison of Classifiers

The selection of the best classification algorithm for a given dataset is a very widespread problem. It is also a complex one, in the sense it requires to make several important methodological choices. Among them, in this work we focus on the measure used to assess the classification performance and rank the algorithms. We present the most popular measures and discuss their properties. Despite the numerous measures proposed over the years, many of them turn out to be equivalent in this specific case, to have interpretation problems, or to be unsuitable for our purpose. Consequently, classic overall success rate or marginal rates should be preferred for this specific task.Comment: The 5th International Conference on Information Technology, amman : Jordanie (2011

An Overview of Classifier Fusion Methods

A number of classifier fusion methods have been recently developed opening an alternative approach leading to a potential improvement in the classification performance. As there is little theory of information fusion itself, currently we are faced with different methods designed for different problems and producing different results. This paper gives an overview of classifier fusion methods and attempts to identify new trends that may dominate this area of research in future. A taxonomy of fusion methods trying to bring some order into the existing “pudding of diversities” is also provided