Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Alters Auditory-motor Integration For Voice Control

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common drug-refractory focal epilepsy in adults. Previous research has shown that patients with TLE exhibit decreased performance in listening to speech sounds and deficits in the cortical processing of auditory information. Whether TLE compromises auditory-motor integration for voice control, however, remains largely unknown. To address this question, event-related potentials (ERPs) and vocal responses to vocal pitch errors (1/2 or 2 semitones upward) heard in auditory feedback were compared across 28 patients with TLE and 28 healthy controls. Patients with TLE produced significantly larger vocal responses but smaller P2 responses than healthy controls. Moreover, patients with TLE exhibited a positive correlation between vocal response magnitude and baseline voice variability and a negative correlation between P2 amplitude and disease duration. Graphical network analyses revealed a disrupted neuronal network for patients with TLE with a significant increase of clustering coefficients and path lengths as compared to healthy controls. These findings provide strong evidence that TLE is associated with an atypical integration of the auditory and motor systems for vocal pitch regulation, and that the functional networks that support the auditory-motor processing of pitch feedback errors differ between patients with TLE and healthy controls

Auditory feedback control mechanisms do not contribute to cortical hyperactivity within the voice production network in adductor spasmodic dysphonia

Adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD), the most common form of spasmodic dysphonia, is a debilitating voice disorder characterized by hyperactivity and muscle spasms in the vocal folds during speech. Prior neuroimaging studies have noted excessive brain activity during speech in ADSD participants compared to controls. Speech involves an auditory feedback control mechanism that generates motor commands aimed at eliminating disparities between desired and actual auditory signals. Thus, excessive neural activity in ADSD during speech may reflect, at least in part, increased engagement of the auditory feedback control mechanism as it attempts to correct vocal production errors detected through audition. To test this possibility, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to identify differences between ADSD participants and age-matched controls in (i) brain activity when producing speech under different auditory feedback conditions, and (ii) resting state functional connectivity within the cortical network responsible for vocalization. The ADSD group had significantly higher activity than the control group during speech (compared to a silent baseline task) in three left-hemisphere cortical regions: ventral Rolandic (sensorimotor) cortex, anterior planum temporale, and posterior superior temporal gyrus/planum temporale. This was true for speech while auditory feedback was masked with noise as well as for speech with normal auditory feedback, indicating that the excess activity was not the result of auditory feedback control mechanisms attempting to correct for perceived voicing errors in ADSD. Furthermore, the ADSD group had significantly higher resting state functional connectivity between sensorimotor and auditory cortical regions within the left hemisphere as well as between the left and right hemispheres, consistent with the view that excessive motor activity frequently co-occurs with increased auditory cortical activity in individuals with ADSD.First author draf

Abnormal Speech Motor Control in Individuals with 16p11.2 Deletions.

Speech and motor deficits are highly prevalent (>70%) in individuals with the 600 kb BP4-BP5 16p11.2 deletion; however, the mechanisms that drive these deficits are unclear, limiting our ability to target interventions and advance treatment. This study examined fundamental aspects of speech motor control in participants with the 16p11.2 deletion. To assess capacity for control of voice, we examined how accurately and quickly subjects changed the pitch of their voice within a trial to correct for a transient perturbation of the pitch of their auditory feedback. When compared to controls, 16p11.2 deletion carriers show an over-exaggerated pitch compensation response to unpredictable mid-vocalization pitch perturbations. We also examined sensorimotor adaptation of speech by assessing how subjects learned to adapt their sustained productions of formants (speech spectral peak frequencies important for vowel identity), in response to consistent changes in their auditory feedback during vowel production. Deletion carriers show reduced sensorimotor adaptation to sustained vowel identity changes in auditory feedback. These results together suggest that 16p11.2 deletion carriers have fundamental impairments in the basic mechanisms of speech motor control and these impairments may partially explain the deficits in speech and language in these individuals

The role of linguistic contrasts in the auditory feedback control of Speech

Thesis (Ph. D. in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2010.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 165-180).Speakers use auditory feedback to monitor their own speech, ensuring that the intended output matches the observed output. By altering the acoustic feedback signal before it reaches the speaker's ear, we can induce auditory errors: differences between what is expected and what is heard. This dissertation investigates the neural mechanisms responsible for the detection and consequent correction of these auditory errors. Linguistic influences on feedback control were assessed in two experiments employing auditory perturbation. In a behavioral experiment, subjects spoke four-word sentences while the fundamental frequency (FO) of the stressed word was perturbed either upwards or downwards, causing the word to sound more or less stressed. Subjects adapted by altering both the FO and the intensity contrast between stressed and unstressed words, even though intensity remained unperturbed. An integrated model of prosodic control is proposed in which FO and intensity are modulated together to achieve a stress target. In a second experiment, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure neural responses to speech with and without auditory perturbation. Subjects were found to compensate more for formant shifts that resulted in a phonetic category change than for formant shifts that did not, despite the identical magnitudes of the shifts. Furthermore, the extent of neural activation in superior temporal and inferior frontal regions was greater for cross-category than for within-category shifts, evidence that a stronger cortical error signal accompanies a linguistically-relevant acoustic change. Taken together, these results demonstrate that auditory feedback control is sensitive to linguistic contrasts learned through auditory experience.by Caroline A. Niziolek.Ph.D.in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technolog

Role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in action-based predictive coding deficits in schizophrenia

Published in final edited form as:Biol Psychiatry. 2017 March 15; 81(6): 514–524. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.019.BACKGROUND: Recent theoretical models of schizophrenia posit that dysfunction of the neural mechanisms subserving predictive coding contributes to symptoms and cognitive deficits, and this dysfunction is further posited to result from N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor (NMDAR) hypofunction. Previously, by examining auditory cortical responses to self-generated speech sounds, we demonstrated that predictive coding during vocalization is disrupted in schizophrenia. To test the hypothesized contribution of NMDAR hypofunction to this disruption, we examined the effects of the NMDAR antagonist, ketamine, on predictive coding during vocalization in healthy volunteers and compared them with the effects of schizophrenia. METHODS: In two separate studies, the N1 component of the event-related potential elicited by speech sounds during vocalization (talk) and passive playback (listen) were compared to assess the degree of N1 suppression during vocalization, a putative measure of auditory predictive coding. In the crossover study, 31 healthy volunteers completed two randomly ordered test days, a saline day and a ketamine day. Event-related potentials during the talk/listen task were obtained before infusion and during infusion on both days, and N1 amplitudes were compared across days. In the case-control study, N1 amplitudes from 34 schizophrenia patients and 33 healthy control volunteers were compared. RESULTS: N1 suppression to self-produced vocalizations was significantly and similarly diminished by ketamine (Cohen’s d = 1.14) and schizophrenia (Cohen’s d = .85). CONCLUSIONS: Disruption of NMDARs causes dysfunction in predictive coding during vocalization in a manner similar to the dysfunction observed in schizophrenia patients, consistent with the theorized contribution of NMDAR hypofunction to predictive coding deficits in schizophrenia.This work was supported by AstraZeneca for an investigator-initiated study (DHM) and the National Institute of Mental Health Grant Nos. R01 MH-58262 (to JMF) and T32 MH089920 (to NSK). JHK was supported by the Yale Center for Clinical Investigation Grant No. UL1RR024139 and the US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant No. P50AA012879. (AstraZeneca for an investigator-initiated study (DHM); R01 MH-58262 - National Institute of Mental Health; T32 MH089920 - National Institute of Mental Health; UL1RR024139 - Yale Center for Clinical Investigation; P50AA012879 - US National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism)Accepted manuscrip

Functional role of delta and theta band oscillations for auditory feedback processing during vocal pitch motor control

The answer to the question of how the brain incorporates sensory feedback and links it with motor function to achieve goal-directed movement during vocalization remains unclear. We investigated the mechanisms of voice pitch motor control by examining the spectro-temporal dynamics of EEG signals when non-musicians (NM), relative pitch (RP) and absolute pitch (AP) musicians maintained vocalizations of a vowel sound and received randomized ±100 cents pitch-shift stimuli in their auditory feedback. We identified a phase-synchronized (evoked) fronto-central activation within the theta band (5-8 Hz) that temporally overlapped with compensatory vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback and was significantly stronger in RP and AP musicians compared with non-musicians. A second component involved a non-phase-synchronized (induced) frontal activation within the delta band (1-4 Hz) that emerged at approximately 1 second after the stimulus onset. The delta activation was significantly stronger in the NM compared with RP and AP groups and correlated with the pitch rebound error (PRE), indicating the degree to which subjects failed to re-adjust their voice pitch to baseline after the stimulus offset. We propose that the evoked theta is a neurophysiological marker of enhanced pitch processing in musicians and reflects mechanisms by which humans incorporate auditory feedback to control their voice pitch. We also suggest that the delta activation reflects adaptive neural processes by which vocal production errors are monitored and used to update the state of sensory-motor networks for driving subsequent vocal behaviors. This notion is corroborated by our findings showing that larger PREs were associated with greater delta band activity in the NM compared with RP and AP groups. These findings provide new insights into the neural mechanisms of auditory feedback processing for vocal pitch motor control

The role of the cerebellum in adaptation: ALE meta‐analyses on sensory feedback error

It is widely accepted that unexpected sensory consequences of self‐action engage the cerebellum. However, we currently lack consensus on where in the cerebellum, we find fine‐grained differentiation to unexpected sensory feedback. This may result from methodological diversity in task‐based human neuroimaging studies that experimentally alter the quality of self‐generated sensory feedback. We gathered existing studies that manipulated sensory feedback using a variety of methodological approaches and performed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta‐analyses. Only half of these studies reported cerebellar activation with considerable variation in spatial location. Consequently, ALE analyses did not reveal significantly increased likelihood of activation in the cerebellum despite the broad scientific consensus of the cerebellum's involvement. In light of the high degree of methodological variability in published studies, we tested for statistical dependence between methodological factors that varied across the published studies. Experiments that elicited an adaptive response to continuously altered sensory feedback more frequently reported activation in the cerebellum than those experiments that did not induce adaptation. These findings may explain the surprisingly low rate of significant cerebellar activation across brain imaging studies investigating unexpected sensory feedback. Furthermore, limitations of functional magnetic resonance imaging to probe the cerebellum could play a role as climbing fiber activity associated with feedback error processing may not be captured by it. We provide methodological recommendations that may guide future studies

Oromotor Kinematics of Speech In Children and the Effect of an External Rhythmic Auditory Stimulus

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of an external auditory rhythmic stimulus on the kinematics of the oromotor musculature during speech production in children and adults. To this effect, the research questions were: 1) Do children entrain labiomandibular movements to an external auditory stimulus? 2) Does the ability to entrain labiomandibular movements to an external auditory stimulus change with age? 3) Does an external auditory stimulus change the coordination and stability of the upper lip, lower lip, and jaw when producing speech sounds? The oromotor kinematics of two groups of children, age eight to ten (n = 6) and eleven to fourteen (n = 6), were compared to the oromotor kinematics of adults (n = 12) while producing bilabial syllables with and without an external auditory stimulus. The kinematic correlates of speech production were recorded using video-based 4-dimensional motion capture technology and included measures of upper lip, lower lip and jaw displacement and their respective derivatives. The Spatiotemporal Index (a single number indication of motor stability and pattern formation) and Synchronization Error (a numerical indication of phase deviations) were calculated for each participant within each condition. There were no statistically significant differences between age groups for the Spatiotemporal Index or for Synchronization Error. Results indicated that there were statistically significant differences in the Spatiotemporal Index for condition; with Post-hoc tests indicating that the difference was between the first condition (no rhythm) and the second condition (self-paced rhythm). Results indicated that both child groups were able to synchronize to an external auditory stimulus. Furthermore, the older child group was able to establish oromotor synchrony with near-adult abilities

Using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to understand cognitive processing

Noninvasive brain stimulation methods are becoming increasingly common tools in the kit of the cognitive scientist. In particular, transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is showing great promise as a tool to causally manipulate the brain and understand how information is processed. The popularity of this method of brain stimulation is based on the fact that it is safe, inexpensive, its effects are long lasting, and you can increase the likelihood that neurons will fire near one electrode and decrease the likelihood that neurons will fire near another. However, this method of manipulating the brain to draw causal inferences is not without complication. Because tDCS methods continue to be refined and are not yet standardized, there are reports in the literature that show some striking inconsistencies. Primary among the complications of the technique is that the tDCS method uses two or more electrodes to pass current and all of these electrodes will have effects on the tissue underneath them. In this tutorial, we will share what we have learned about using tDCS to manipulate how the brain perceives, attends, remembers, and responds to information from our environment. Our goal is to provide a starting point for new users of tDCS and spur discussion of the standardization of methods to enhance replicability.The authors declare that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-EY019882, R01-EY025272, P30-EY08126, F31-MH102042, and T32-EY007135). (R01-EY019882 - National Institutes of Health; R01-EY025272 - National Institutes of Health; P30-EY08126 - National Institutes of Health; F31-MH102042 - National Institutes of Health; T32-EY007135 - National Institutes of Health)Accepted manuscrip