24,188 research outputs found
Modeling Belief in Dynamic Systems, Part II: Revision and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In
recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief
update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern,
1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework
combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility,
allowing us to examine the change of beliefs over time. In this paper, we show
how belief revision and belief update can be captured in our framework. This
allows us to compare the assumptions made by each method, and to better
understand the principles underlying them. In particular, it shows that Katsuno
and Mendelzon's notion of belief update (Katsuno & Mendelzon, 1991a) depends on
several strong assumptions that may limit its applicability in artificial
intelligence. Finally, our analysis allow us to identify a notion of minimal
change that underlies a broad range of belief change operations including
revision and update.Comment: See http://www.jair.org/ for other files accompanying this articl
Recommended from our members
Chemical discovery as belief revision
In this paper we describe STAHLp, a system that constructs componential models of chemical substances. STAHLp is a descendent of Zytkow and Simon's (1986) STAHL system, and both use chemical reactions and known componential models in order to construct new chemical models. However, STAHLp employs a more unified and effective strategy for recovering from erroneous inferences, based partly on de Kleer's (1984) assumption-based method of belief revision. This involves recording the underlying source beliefs or premises which lead to each inferred reaction or model. Where Zytkow and Simon's system required multiple methods for detecting errors and recovering from them, STAHLp uses a more powerful representation and additional rules which allow a unified method for error detection and recovery. When given the same initial data, the new system constructs the same historically correct models as STAHL, but it has other capabilities as well. In particular, STAHLp can modify data it has been given if this is necessary to achieve consistent models, and then proceed to construct new models based on the revised data
Belief Revision with Uncertain Inputs in the Possibilistic Setting
This paper discusses belief revision under uncertain inputs in the framework
of possibility theory. Revision can be based on two possible definitions of the
conditioning operation, one based on min operator which requires a purely
ordinal scale only, and another based on product, for which a richer structure
is needed, and which is a particular case of Dempster's rule of conditioning.
Besides, revision under uncertain inputs can be understood in two different
ways depending on whether the input is viewed, or not, as a constraint to
enforce. Moreover, it is shown that M.A. Williams' transmutations, originally
defined in the setting of Spohn's functions, can be captured in this framework,
as well as Boutilier's natural revision.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in
Artificial Intelligence (UAI1996
Towards Closed World Reasoning in Dynamic Open Worlds (Extended Version)
The need for integration of ontologies with nonmonotonic rules has been
gaining importance in a number of areas, such as the Semantic Web. A number of
researchers addressed this problem by proposing a unified semantics for hybrid
knowledge bases composed of both an ontology (expressed in a fragment of
first-order logic) and nonmonotonic rules. These semantics have matured over
the years, but only provide solutions for the static case when knowledge does
not need to evolve. In this paper we take a first step towards addressing the
dynamics of hybrid knowledge bases. We focus on knowledge updates and,
considering the state of the art of belief update, ontology update and rule
update, we show that current solutions are only partial and difficult to
combine. Then we extend the existing work on ABox updates with rules, provide a
semantics for such evolving hybrid knowledge bases and study its basic
properties. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that an update
operator is proposed for hybrid knowledge bases.Comment: 40 pages; an extended version of the article published in Theory and
Practice of Logic Programming, 10 (4-6): 547 - 564, July. Copyright 2010
Cambridge University Pres
- …