4,703 research outputs found

    06241 Abstracts Collection -- Human Motion - Understanding, Modeling, Capture and Animation. 13th Workshop

    Get PDF
    From 11.06.06 to 16.06.06, the Dagstuhl Seminar 06241 ``Human Motion - Understanding, Modeling, Capture and Animation. 13th Workshop "Theoretical Foundations of Computer Vision"\u27\u27 was held in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general

    Learning Articulated Motions From Visual Demonstration

    Full text link
    Many functional elements of human homes and workplaces consist of rigid components which are connected through one or more sliding or rotating linkages. Examples include doors and drawers of cabinets and appliances; laptops; and swivel office chairs. A robotic mobile manipulator would benefit from the ability to acquire kinematic models of such objects from observation. This paper describes a method by which a robot can acquire an object model by capturing depth imagery of the object as a human moves it through its range of motion. We envision that in future, a machine newly introduced to an environment could be shown by its human user the articulated objects particular to that environment, inferring from these "visual demonstrations" enough information to actuate each object independently of the user. Our method employs sparse (markerless) feature tracking, motion segmentation, component pose estimation, and articulation learning; it does not require prior object models. Using the method, a robot can observe an object being exercised, infer a kinematic model incorporating rigid, prismatic and revolute joints, then use the model to predict the object's motion from a novel vantage point. We evaluate the method's performance, and compare it to that of a previously published technique, for a variety of household objects.Comment: Published in Robotics: Science and Systems X, Berkeley, CA. ISBN: 978-0-9923747-0-

    Spacesuit Range of Motion Investigations Using Video and Motion Capture Systems at Spaceflight Analogue Expeditions and within the ERAU S.U.I.T. Lab

    Get PDF
    The Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) Spacesuit Utilization of Innovative Technology Laboratory (S.U.I.T. Lab) is dedicated to the pursuit of advancing human spaceflight by contributing to spacesuit and operations research with experiential programs for students. A significant portion of the S.U.I.T. Labโ€™s portfolio is dedicated to the design and execution of spacesuit range of motion (ROM) investigations using video and motion capture systems. ROM biomechanical angles were measured using these techniques in conjunction with developing protocols for both simulated extravehicular activity suits at spaceflight analogue expeditions, and on ERAU campus with Final Frontier Design (FFD) intravehicular activity pressure suits. Designing protocols ensures effective communication for the analysis of simulated spacesuit performance to a remote crew. With communication delays to Earth, a self-sufficient spacesuit diagnosis is required to provide future astronauts with immediate action to take when dealing with a malfunctioning spacesuit. The video capture methodology is designed so that any crew would be able to conduct recordings with minimal impact to their schedule and with camera resources that are standard equipment. Spaceflight mission analogues involved in this study include: Hawai\u27i Space Exploration Analog and Simulation (HI-SEAS Mission V, 2017); Mars Desert Research Station (MDRS Crew 188, 2018), and AMADEE-18 in Oman (2018). Video capture can be used to collaborate with several spacesuit manufacturers to offer a snapshot comparison between designs, validate and verify capabilities, and aid with the selection of the right suit for the right job. The analogue locations recorded unsuited and suited data, while the November FFD test focused on motion capture (with video capture taken for validation) of unsuited, suited unpressurized, and suited while pressurized to 3.5 psid conditions. Early results from the motion capture align with values estimated from video capture and future work will compare the accuracy of these techniques

    Evaluating the hip range of motion using the goniometer, the Nintendo Wiimote and video tracking methods

    Get PDF
    The range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint is an important clinical parameter used in diagnosing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Early detection of FAI helps people avoid the development of osteoarthritis. The goniometer is the most common method employed to measure joint angles. However, it has several limitations with respect to allowing clinicians to analyse the ROM at the gate, and tracking the hip joint during walking or in maximum squat. Motion capture devices used for analyzing the patientโ€™s gait and assessing the condition of joints and bones are accurate but require significant logistical and financial investment. The Nintendo Wiimote, used typically in games, has found its way to medical applications such as rehabilitation interventions and shows promise. This is the first study of its kind to evaluate the goniometer, a bespoke Wiimote system as well as a marker-based motion capture (MoCap) system to measure ROM. The aim of the article is to develop and assess a reliable, validated, easy to apply but scientifically sound method to measure ROM. This study used three methods to measure ROM. Namely, a high-spec marker-based MoCap system (Vicon), a markerless MoCap system (bespoke Wiimote system) and the conventional goniometer to examine the range of motion of 20 subject volunteers. This is the first of its kind to evaluate these three methods. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the three methods is higher than 0.8 which shows that the reliability of all the methods is adequate. The validity of the marker-based MoCap system and the bespoke Wiimote is the same and furthermore, it is sufficiently robust to be used in clinical assessment. The marker-based MoCap system has slightly higher reliability and validity compared to the bespoke Wiimote system but the latter is easier to deploy, lower in cost, a more portable method and allows surgeons to have one free hand in order to avoid pelvic rotation and errors. The limitation of this study was the use of non FAI volunteers. It is concluded that the Wiimote can be used instead of the goniometer in clinical settings. The Wiimote is easy to use, portable, reliable and accurate

    A Tangible Solution for Hand Motion Tracking in Clinical Applications

    Get PDF
    Objective real-time assessment of hand motion is crucial in many clinical applications including technically-assisted physical rehabilitation of the upper extremity. We propose an inertial-sensor-based hand motion tracking system and a set of dual-quaternion-based methods for estimation of finger segment orientations and fingertip positions. The proposed system addresses the specific requirements of clinical applications in two ways: (1) In contrast to glove-based approaches, the proposed solution maintains the sense of touch. (2) In contrast to previous work, the proposed methods avoid the use of complex calibration procedures, which means that they are suitable for patients with severe motor impairment of the hand. To overcome the limited significance of validation in lab environments with homogeneous magnetic fields, we validate the proposed system using functional hand motions in the presence of severe magnetic disturbances as they appear in realistic clinical settings. We show that standard sensor fusion methods that rely on magnetometer readings may perform well in perfect laboratory environments but can lead to more than 15 cm root-mean-square error for the fingertip distances in realistic environments, while our advanced method yields root-mean-square errors below 2 cm for all performed motions.DFG, 414044773, Open Access Publizieren 2019 - 2020 / Technische Universitรคt Berli

    EVALUATING THE HIP RANGE OF MOTION USING THE GONIOMETER, THE NINTENDO WIIMOTE AND VIDEO TRACKING METHODS

    Get PDF
    The range of motion (ROM) of the hip joint is an important clinical parameter used in diagnosing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Early detection of FAI helps people avoid the development of osteoarthritis. The goniometer is the most common method employed to measure joint angles. However, it has several limitations with respect to allowing clinicians to analyse the ROM at the gate, and tracking the hip joint during walking or in maximum squat. Motion capture devices used for analyzing the patientโ€™s gait and assessing the condition of joints and bones are accurate but require significant logistical and financial investment. The Nintendo Wiimote, used typically in games, has found its way to medical applications such as rehabilitation interventions and shows promise. This is the first study of its kind to evaluate the goniometer, a bespoke Wiimote system as well as a marker-based motion capture (MoCap) system to measure ROM. The aim of the article is to develop and assess a reliable, validated, easy to apply but scientifically sound method to measure ROM. This study used three methods to measure ROM. Namely, a high-spec marker-based MoCap system (Vicon), a markerless MoCap system (bespoke Wiimote system) and the conventional goniometer to examine the range of motion of 20 subject volunteers. This is the first of its kind to evaluate these three methods. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the three methods is higher than 0.8 which shows that the reliability of all the methods is adequate. The validity of the marker-based MoCap system and the bespoke Wiimote is the same and furthermore, it is sufficiently robust to be used in clinical assessment. The marker-based MoCap system has slightly higher reliability and validity compared to the bespoke Wiimote system but the latter is easier to deploy, lower in cost, a more portable method and allows surgeons to have one free hand in order to avoid pelvic rotation and errors. The limitation of this study was the use of non FAI volunteers. It is concluded that the Wiimote can be used instead of the goniometer in clinical settings. The Wiimote is easy to use, portable, reliable and accurate

    ๋™์˜์ƒ ์† ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์ด์ œํฌ.In computer graphics, simulating and analyzing human movement have been interesting research topics started since the 1960s. Still, simulating realistic human movements in a 3D virtual world is a challenging task in computer graphics. In general, motion capture techniques have been used. Although the motion capture data guarantees realistic result and high-quality data, there is lots of equipment required to capture motion, and the process is complicated. Recently, 3D human pose estimation techniques from the 2D video are remarkably developed. Researchers in computer graphics and computer vision have attempted to reconstruct the various human motions from video data. However, existing methods can not robustly estimate dynamic actions and not work on videos filmed with a moving camera. In this thesis, we propose methods to reconstruct dynamic human motions from in-the-wild videos and to control the motions. First, we developed a framework to reconstruct motion from videos using prior physics knowledge. For dynamic motions such as backspin, the poses estimated by a state-of-the-art method are incomplete and include unreliable root trajectory or lack intermediate poses. We designed a reward function using poses and hints extracted from videos in the deep reinforcement learning controller and learned a policy to simultaneously reconstruct motion and control a virtual character. Second, we simulated figure skating movements in video. Skating sequences consist of fast and dynamic movements on ice, hindering the acquisition of motion data. Thus, we extracted 3D key poses from a video to then successfully replicate several figure skating movements using trajectory optimization and a deep reinforcement learning controller. Third, we devised an algorithm for gait analysis through video of patients with movement disorders. After acquiring the patients joint positions from 2D video processed by a deep learning network, the 3D absolute coordinates were estimated, and gait parameters such as gait velocity, cadence, and step length were calculated. Additionally, we analyzed the optimization criteria of human walking by using a 3D musculoskeletal humanoid model and physics-based simulation. For two criteria, namely, the minimization of muscle activation and joint torque, we compared simulation data with real human data for analysis. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the first two research topics, we verified the reconstruction of dynamic human motions from 2D videos using physics-based simulations. For the last two research topics, we evaluated our results with real human data.์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์€ 1960 ๋…„๋Œ€๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ช‡ ์‹ญ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์–ด ์™”์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , 3์ฐจ์› ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ƒ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ๋„์ „์ ์ธ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋™์•ˆ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ฒ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์žฅ๋น„๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์— 2์ฐจ์› ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๊ด„๋ชฉํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์™€ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋น„์ ผ ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•œ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ง€์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ค‘์ œ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์ตœ์‹  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋™์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์ž์„ธ๋“ค์€ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ถค์ ์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์— ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •์— ์‹คํŒจํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ํฌ์ฆˆ์™€ ํžŒํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์ƒ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ์…˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์งธ, ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์€ ๋น™์ƒ์—์„œ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์›€์ง์ž„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ๋ชจ์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กญ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ 3์ฐจ์› ํ‚ค ํฌ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ถค์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์—ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹ ์งธ, ํŒŒํ‚จ์Šจ ๋ณ‘์ด๋‚˜ ๋‡Œ์„ฑ๋งˆ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์žฅ์• ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ณดํ–‰์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. 2์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ธ ๋‹ค์Œ, 3์ฐจ์› ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ด์–ด ์ด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณดํญ, ๋ณดํ–‰ ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์ธ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋ณดํ–‰์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํƒ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์œก ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋Œ๋ฆผํž˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ ํ›„, ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์„ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์ค‘ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€์˜ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Background 9 2.1 Pose Estimation from 2D Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Motion Reconstruction from Monocular Video . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 Physics-Based Character Simulation and Control . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.4 Motion Reconstruction Leveraging Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5 Human Motion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.5.1 Figure Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.6 Objective Gait Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.7 Optimization for Human Movement Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.7.1 Stability Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3 Human Dynamics from Monocular Video with Dynamic Camera Movements 19 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3 Pose and Contact Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4 Learning Human Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.4.1 Policy Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.4.2 Network Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.4.3 Scene Estimator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.1 Video Clips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.2 Comparison of Contact Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.5.3 Ablation Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.5.4 Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4 Figure Skating Simulation from Video 42 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2 System Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.3 Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.3.1 Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.3.2 Relaxation of Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.4 Data Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.5 Trajectory Optimization and Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.1 Trajectory Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.2 Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.6 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.7 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5 Gait Analysis Using Pose Estimation Algorithm with 2D-video of Patients 61 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.1 Patients and video recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.2 Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents 66 5.2.3 3D Pose estimation from 2D video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.2.4 Gait parameter estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2.5 Statistical analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.1 Validation of video-based analysis of the gait . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.2 gait analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.4.1 Validation with the conventional sensor-based method . . . . 75 5.4.2 Analysis of gait and turning in TUG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.4.3 Correlation with clinical parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.4.4 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.5 Supplementary Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 6 Control Optimization of Human Walking 80 6.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 6.2 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.1 Musculoskeletal model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.2 Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.3 Control co-activation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6.2.4 Push-recovery experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 7 Conclusion 90 7.1 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91Docto

    Human Motion Analysis with Wearable Inertial Sensors

    Get PDF
    High-resolution, quantitative data obtained by a human motion capture system can be used to better understand the cause of many diseases for effective treatments. Talking about the daily care of the aging population, two issues are critical. One is to continuously track motions and position of aging people when they are at home, inside a building or in the unknown environment; the other is to monitor their health status in real time when they are in the free-living environment. Continuous monitoring of human movement in their natural living environment potentially provide more valuable feedback than these in laboratory settings. However, it has been extremely challenging to go beyond laboratory and obtain accurate measurements of human physical activity in free-living environments. Commercial motion capture systems produce excellent in-studio capture and reconstructions, but offer no comparable solution for acquisition in everyday environments. Therefore in this dissertation, a wearable human motion analysis system is developed for continuously tracking human motions, monitoring health status, positioning human location and recording the itinerary. In this dissertation, two systems are developed for seeking aforementioned two goals: tracking human body motions and positioning a human. Firstly, an inertial-based human body motion tracking system with our developed inertial measurement unit (IMU) is introduced. By arbitrarily attaching a wearable IMU to each segment, segment motions can be measured and translated into inertial data by IMUs. A human model can be reconstructed in real time based on the inertial data by applying high efficient twists and exponential maps techniques. Secondly, for validating the feasibility of developed tracking system in the practical application, model-based quantification approaches for resting tremor and lower extremity bradykinesia in Parkinsonโ€™s disease are proposed. By estimating all involved joint angles in PD symptoms based on reconstructed human model, angle characteristics with corresponding medical ratings are employed for training a HMM classifier for quantification. Besides, a pedestrian positioning system is developed for tracking userโ€™s itinerary and positioning in the global frame. Corresponding tests have been carried out to assess the performance of each system
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore