Model Checking Race-freedom When "Sequential Consistency for Data-race-free Programs" is Guaranteed

Many parallel programming models guarantee that if all sequentially consistent (SC) executions of a program are free of data races, then all executions of the program will appear to be sequentially consistent. This greatly simplifies reasoning about the program, but leaves open the question of how to verify that all SC executions are race-free. In this paper, we show that with a few simple modifications, model checking can be an effective tool for verifying race-freedom. We explore this technique on a suite of C programs parallelized with OpenMP

LLOV: A Fast Static Data-Race Checker for OpenMP Programs

In the era of Exascale computing, writing efficient parallel programs is indispensable and at the same time, writing sound parallel programs is very difficult. Specifying parallelism with frameworks such as OpenMP is relatively easy, but data races in these programs are an important source of bugs. In this paper, we propose LLOV, a fast, lightweight, language agnostic, and static data race checker for OpenMP programs based on the LLVM compiler framework. We compare LLOV with other state-of-the-art data race checkers on a variety of well-established benchmarks. We show that the precision, accuracy, and the F1 score of LLOV is comparable to other checkers while being orders of magnitude faster. To the best of our knowledge, LLOV is the only tool among the state-of-the-art data race checkers that can verify a C/C++ or FORTRAN program to be data race free.Comment: Accepted in ACM TACO, August 202

LLOV: A Fast Static Data-Race Checker for OpenMP Programs

In the era of Exascale computing, writing efficient parallel programs is indispensable and at the same time, writing sound parallel programs is highly difficult. While parallel programming is easier with frameworks such as OpenMP, the possibility of data races in these programs still persists. In this paper, we propose a fast, lightweight, language agnostic, and static data race checker for OpenMP programs based on the LLVM compiler framework. We compare our tool with other state-of-the-art data race checkers on a variety of well-established benchmarks. We show that the precision, accuracy, and the F1 score of our tool is comparable to other checkers while being orders of magnitude faster. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the only tool among the state-of-the-art data race checkers that can verify a FORTRAN program to be data race free

Safe Parallelism: Compiler Analysis Techniques for Ada and OpenMP

There is a growing need to support parallel computation in Ada to cope with the performance requirements of the most advanced functionalities of safety-critical systems. In that regard, the use of parallel programming models is paramount to exploit the benefits of parallelism. Recent works motivate the use of OpenMP for being a de facto standard in high-performance computing for programming shared memory architectures. These works address two important aspects towards the introduction of OpenMP in Ada: the compatibility of the OpenMP syntax with the Ada language, and the interoperability of the OpenMP and the Ada runtimes, demonstrating that OpenMP complements and supports the structured parallelism approach of the tasklet model. This paper addresses a third fundamental aspect: functional safety from a compiler perspective. Particularly, it focuses on race conditions and considers the fine-grain and unstructured capabilities of OpenMP. Hereof, this paper presents a new compiler analysis technique that: (1) identifies potential race conditions in parallel Ada programs based on OpenMP or Ada tasks or both, and (2) provides solutions for the detected races.This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under contract TIN2015-65316-P, and by the FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) within the CISTER Research Unit (CEC/04234).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Static Validation of Barriers and Worksharing Constructs in OpenMP Applications

International audienceThe OpenMP specification requires that all threads in a team execute the same sequence of worksharing and barrier regions. An improper use of such directive may lead to deadlocks. In this paper we propose a static analysis to ensure this property is verified. The well-defined semantic of OpenMP programs makes compiler analysis more effective. We propose a new compile-time method to identify in OpenMP codes the potential improper uses of barriers and work-sharing constructs, and the execution paths that are responsible for these issues. We implemented our method in a GCC compiler plugin and show the small im-pact of our analysis on performance for NAS-OMP benchmarks and a test case for a production industrial code

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationHigh Performance Computing (HPC) on-node parallelism is of extreme importance to guarantee and maintain scalability across large clusters of hundreds of thousands of multicore nodes. HPC programming is dominated by the hybrid model "MPI + X", with MPI to exploit the parallelism across the nodes, and "X" as some shared memory parallel programming model to accomplish multicore parallelism across CPUs or GPUs. OpenMP has become the "X" standard de-facto in HPC to exploit the multicore architectures of modern CPUs. Data races are one of the most common and insidious of concurrent errors in shared memory programming models and OpenMP programs are not immune to them. The OpenMP-provided ease of use to parallelizing programs can often make it error-prone to data races which become hard to find in large applications with thousands lines of code. Unfortunately, prior tools are unable to impact practice owing to their poor coverage or poor scalability. In this work, we develop several new approaches for low overhead data race detection. Our approaches aim to guarantee high precision and accuracy of race checking while maintaining a low runtime and memory overhead. We present two race checkers for C/C++ OpenMP programs that target two different classes of programs. The first, ARCHER, is fast but requires large amount of memory, so it ideally targets applications that require only a small portion of the available on-node memory. On the other hand, SWORD strikes a balance between fast zero memory overhead data collection followed by offline analysis that can take a long time, but it often report most races quickly. Given that race checking was impossible for large OpenMP applications, our contributions are the best available advances in what is known to be a difficult NP-complete problem. We performed an extensive evaluation of the tools on existing OpenMP programs and HPC benchmarks. Results show that both tools guarantee to identify all the races of a program in a given run without reporting any false alarms. The tools are user-friendly, hence serve as an important instrument for the daily work of programmers to help them identify data races early during development and production testing. Furthermore, our demonstrated success on real-world applications puts these tools on the top list of debugging tools for scientists at large

A toolchain to verify the parallelization of OmpSs-2 applications

Programming models for task-based parallelization based on compile-time directives are very effective at uncovering the parallelism available in HPC applications. Despite that, the process of correctly annotating complex applications is error-prone and may hinder the general adoption of these models. In this paper, we target the OmpSs-2 programming model and present a novel toolchain able to detect parallelization errors coming from non-compliant OmpSs-2 applications. Our toolchain verifies the compliance with the OmpSs-2 programming model using local task analysis to deal with each task separately, and structural induction to extend the analysis to the whole program. To improve the effectiveness of our tools, we also introduce some ad-hoc verification annotations, which can be used manually or automatically to disable the analysis of specific code regions. Experiments run on a sample of representative kernels and applications show that our toolchain can be successfully used to verify the parallelization of complex real-world applications.This project is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2021 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 754304 (DEEP-EST), by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 871669 (AMPERE) and the Project HPCEUROPA3 (INFRAIA-2016-1-730897), by the Ministry of Economy of Spain through the Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence Program (SEV-2015-0493), by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (contract TIN2015-65316-P), and by the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017-SGR-1481).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Advances in Engineering Software for Multicore Systems

The vast amounts of data to be processed by today’s applications demand higher computational power. To meet application requirements and achieve reasonable application performance, it becomes increasingly profitable, or even necessary, to exploit any available hardware parallelism. For both new and legacy applications, successful parallelization is often subject to high cost and price. This chapter proposes a set of methods that employ an optimistic semi-automatic approach, which enables programmers to exploit parallelism on modern hardware architectures. It provides a set of methods, including an LLVM-based tool, to help programmers identify the most promising parallelization targets and understand the key types of parallelism. The approach reduces the manual effort needed for parallelization. A contribution of this work is an efficient profiling method to determine the control and data dependences for performing parallelism discovery or other types of code analysis. Another contribution is a method for detecting code sections where parallel design patterns might be applicable and suggesting relevant code transformations. Our approach efficiently reports detailed runtime data dependences. It accurately identifies opportunities for parallelism and the appropriate type of parallelism to use as task-based or loop-based