A Tightly Secure Identity-based Signature Scheme from Isogenies

We present a tightly secure identity-based signature (IBS) scheme based on the supersingular isogeny problems. Although Shaw and Dutta proposed an isogeny-based IBS scheme with provable security, the security reduction is non-tight. For an IBS scheme with concrete security, the tightness of its security reduction affects the key size and signature size. Hence, it is reasonable to focus on a tight security proof for an isogeny-based IBS scheme. In this paper, we propose an isogeny-based IBS scheme based on the lossy CSI-FiSh signature scheme and give a tight security reduction for this scheme. While the existing isogeny-based IBS has the square-root advantage loss in the security proof, the security proof for our IBS scheme avoids such advantage loss, due to the properties of lossy CSI-FiSh

Tight reduction for generic construction of certificateless signature and its instantiation from DDH assumption

Certificateless signature was proposed by Al-Riyami and Paterson to eliminate the certificate management in the public-key infrastructures and solve the key escrow problem in the identity-based signature. In 2007, Hu et al. proposed a generic construction of certificateless signature. They construct certificateless signature scheme from any standard identity-based signature and signature scheme.However, their security reduction is loose; the security of the constructed scheme depends on the number of users. In this paper, we give the tight reduction for their construction and instantiate a tightly-secure certificateless signature scheme without pairing from DDH assumption. Best of our knowledge, this scheme is the first tightly-secure certificateless signature scheme

A New Practical Identity-Based Encryption System

We present a new practical Identity-Based Encryption (IBE) system that can be another candidate for standard IBE techniques. Our construction is based on a new framework for realizing an IBE trapdoor from pairing-based groups, which is motivated from the `two equation\u27 revocation technique suggested by Lewko, Sahai, and Waters. The new framework enables our IBE system to achieve a tight security reduction to the Decision Bilinear Diffie-Hellman assumption. Due to its the tightness, our system can take as input the shorter size of security parameters than the previous practical BF, SK, and BB$_{1}$ systems, which provides better efficiency to our system in terms of computational cost. With appropriate parametrization at 80-bit security level (considering security loss), our IBE system can obtain 11 times faster decryption than the previous ones and 77 times faster encryption than the BF system. We prove that our system is fully secure against chosen ciphertext attacks in the random oracle model. From computational variant of Naor\u27s observation, we can also suggest a new signature scheme that features a tight security reduction to the Computational Diffie-Hellman assumption and provides strong unforgeability simultaneously

Random Oracles in a Quantum World

The interest in post-quantum cryptography - classical systems that remain secure in the presence of a quantum adversary - has generated elegant proposals for new cryptosystems. Some of these systems are set in the random oracle model and are proven secure relative to adversaries that have classical access to the random oracle. We argue that to prove post-quantum security one needs to prove security in the quantum-accessible random oracle model where the adversary can query the random oracle with quantum states. We begin by separating the classical and quantum-accessible random oracle models by presenting a scheme that is secure when the adversary is given classical access to the random oracle, but is insecure when the adversary can make quantum oracle queries. We then set out to develop generic conditions under which a classical random oracle proof implies security in the quantum-accessible random oracle model. We introduce the concept of a history-free reduction which is a category of classical random oracle reductions that basically determine oracle answers independently of the history of previous queries, and we prove that such reductions imply security in the quantum model. We then show that certain post-quantum proposals, including ones based on lattices, can be proven secure using history-free reductions and are therefore post-quantum secure. We conclude with a rich set of open problems in this area.Comment: 38 pages, v2: many substantial changes and extensions, merged with a related paper by Boneh and Zhandr

Pairing-based identification schemes

We propose four different identification schemes that make use of bilinear pairings, and prove their security under certain computational assumptions. Each of the schemes is more efficient and/or more secure than any known pairing-based identification scheme

Wave: A New Family of Trapdoor One-Way Preimage Sampleable Functions Based on Codes

We present here a new family of trapdoor one-way Preimage Sampleable Functions (PSF) based on codes, the Wave-PSF family. The trapdoor function is one-way under two computational assumptions: the hardness of generic decoding for high weights and the indistinguishability of generalized $(U,U+V)$-codes. Our proof follows the GPV strategy [GPV08]. By including rejection sampling, we ensure the proper distribution for the trapdoor inverse output. The domain sampling property of our family is ensured by using and proving a variant of the left-over hash lemma. We instantiate the new Wave-PSF family with ternary generalized $(U,U+V)$-codes to design a "hash-and-sign" signature scheme which achieves existential unforgeability under adaptive chosen message attacks (EUF-CMA) in the random oracle model. For 128 bits of classical security, signature sizes are in the order of 15 thousand bits, the public key size in the order of 4 megabytes, and the rejection rate is limited to one rejection every 10 to 12 signatures.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1706.0806

Making Existential-Unforgeable Signatures Strongly Unforgeable in the Quantum Random-Oracle Model

Strongly unforgeable signature schemes provide a more stringent security guarantee than the standard existential unforgeability. It requires that not only forging a signature on a new message is hard, it is infeasible as well to produce a new signature on a message for which the adversary has seen valid signatures before. Strongly unforgeable signatures are useful both in practice and as a building block in many cryptographic constructions. This work investigates a generic transformation that compiles any existential-unforgeable scheme into a strongly unforgeable one, which was proposed by Teranishi et al. and was proven in the classical random-oracle model. Our main contribution is showing that the transformation also works against quantum adversaries in the quantum random-oracle model. We develop proof techniques such as adaptively programming a quantum random-oracle in a new setting, which could be of independent interest. Applying the transformation to an existential-unforgeable signature scheme due to Cash et al., which can be shown to be quantum-secure assuming certain lattice problems are hard for quantum computers, we get an efficient quantum-secure strongly unforgeable signature scheme in the quantum random-oracle model.Comment: 15 pages, to appear in Proceedings TQC 201

The problem with the SURF scheme

There is a serious problem with one of the assumptions made in the security proof of the SURF scheme. This problem turns out to be easy in the regime of parameters needed for the SURF scheme to work. We give afterwards the old version of the paper for the reader's convenience.Comment: Warning : we found a serious problem in the security proof of the SURF scheme. We explain this problem here and give the old version of the paper afterward

Security of signed ELGamal encryption

Assuming a cryptographically strong cyclic group G of prime order q and a random hash function H, we show that ElGamal encryption with an added Schnorr signature is secure against the adaptive chosen ciphertext attack, in which an attacker can freely use a decryption oracle except for the target ciphertext. We also prove security against the novel one-more-decyption attack. Our security proofs are in a new model, corresponding to a combination of two previously introduced models, the Random Oracle model and the Generic model. The security extends to the distributed threshold version of the scheme. Moreover, we propose a very practical scheme for private information retrieval that is based on blind decryption of ElGamal ciphertexts

Improvements and New Constructions of Digital Signatures

Ein digitales Signaturverfahren, oft auch nur digitale Signatur genannt, ist ein wichtiger und nicht mehr wegzudenkender Baustein in der Kryptographie. Es stellt das digitale Äquivalent zur klassischen handschriftlichen Signatur dar und liefert darüber hinaus noch weitere wünschenswerte Eigenschaften. Mit solch einem Verfahren kann man einen öffentlichen und einen geheimen Schlüssel erzeugen. Der geheime Schlüssel dient zur Erstellung von Signaturen zu beliebigen Nachrichten. Diese können mit Hilfe des öffentlichen Schlüssels von jedem überprüft und somit verifiziert werden. Desweiteren fordert man, dass das Verfahren "sicher" sein soll. Dazu gibt es in der Literatur viele verschiedene Begriffe und Definitionen, je nachdem welche konkreten Vorstellungen beziehungsweise Anwendungsgebiete man hat. Vereinfacht gesagt, sollte es für einen Angreifer ohne Kenntnis des geheimen Schlüssels nicht möglich sein eine gültige Signatur zu einer beliebigen Nachricht zu fälschen. Ein sicheres Signaturverfahren kann somit verwendet werden um die folgenden Ziele zu realisieren: - Authentizität: Jeder Empfänger kann überprüfen, ob die Nachricht von einem bestimmten Absender kommt. - Integrität der Nachricht: Jeder Empfänger kann feststellen, ob die Nachricht bei der Übertragung verändert wurde. - Nicht-Abstreitbarkeit: Der Absender kann nicht abstreiten die Signatur erstellt zu haben. Damit ist der Einsatz von digitalen Signaturen für viele Anwendungen in der Praxis sehr wichtig. Überall da, wo es wichtig ist die Authentizität und Integrität einer Nachricht sicherzustellen, wie beim elektronischen Zahlungsverkehr, Softwareupdates oder digitalen Zertifikaten im Internet, kommen digitale Signaturen zum Einsatz. Aber auch für die kryptographische Theorie sind digitale Signaturen ein unverzichtbares Hilfsmittel. Sie ermöglichen zum Beispiel die Konstruktion von stark sicheren Verschlüsselungsverfahren. Eigener Beitrag: Wie bereits erwähnt gibt es unterschiedliche Sicherheitsbegriffe im Rahmen von digitalen Signaturen. Ein Standardbegriff von Sicherheit, der eine recht starke Form von Sicherheit beschreibt, wird in dieser Arbeit näher betrachtet. Die Konstruktion von Verfahren, die diese Form der Sicherheit erfüllen, ist ein vielschichtiges Forschungsthema. Dazu existieren unterschiedliche Strategien in unterschiedlichen Modellen. In dieser Arbeit konzentrieren wir uns daher auf folgende Punkte. - Ausgehend von vergleichsweise realistischen Annahmen konstruieren wir ein stark sicheres Signaturverfahren im sogenannten Standardmodell, welches das realistischste Modell für Sicherheitsbeweise darstellt. Unser Verfahren ist das bis dahin effizienteste Verfahren in seiner Kategorie. Es erstellt sehr kurze Signaturen und verwendet kurze Schlüssel, beides unverzichtbar für die Praxis. - Wir verbessern die Qualität eines Sicherheitsbeweises von einem verwandten Baustein, der identitätsbasierten Verschlüsselung. Dies hat unter anderem Auswirkung auf dessen Effizienz bezüglich der empfohlenen Schlüssellängen für den sicheren Einsatz in der Praxis. Da jedes identitätsbasierte Verschlüsselungsverfahren generisch in ein digitales Signaturverfahren umgewandelt werden kann ist dies auch im Kontext digitaler Signaturen interessant. - Wir betrachten Varianten von digitalen Signaturen mit zusätzlichen Eigenschaften, sogenannte aggregierbare Signaturverfahren. Diese ermöglichen es mehrere Signaturen effizient zu einer zusammenzufassen und dabei trotzdem alle zugehörigen verschiedenen Nachrichten zu verifizieren. Wir geben eine neue Konstruktion von solch einem aggregierbaren Signaturverfahren an, bei der das Verfahren eine Liste aller korrekt signierten Nachrichten in einer aggregierten Signatur ausgibt anstatt, wie bisher üblich, nur gültig oder ungültig. Wenn eine aggregierte Signatur aus vielen Einzelsignaturen besteht wird somit das erneute Berechnen und eventuell erneute Senden hinfällig und dadurch der Aufwand erheblich reduziert