Towards a Maude tool for model checking temporal graph properties

We present our prototypical tool for the verification of graph transformation systems. The major novelty of our tool is that it provides a model checker for temporal graph properties based on counterpart semantics for quantified m-calculi. Our tool can be considered as an instantiation of our approach to counterpart semantics which allows for a neat handling of creation, deletion and merging in systems with dynamic structure. Our implementation is based on the object-based machinery of Maude, which provides the basics to deal with attributed graphs. Graph transformation systems are specified with term rewrite rules. The model checker evaluates logical formulae of second-order modal m-calculus in the automatically generated CounterpartModel (a sort of unfolded graph transition system) of the graph transformation system under study. The result of evaluating a formula is a set of assignments for each state, associating node variables to actual nodes

A framework for implementing formally verified resource-bounded smart space systems

© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Context-aware computing is a mobile computing paradigm that helps designing and implementing next generation smart applications, where personalized devices interact with users in smart environments. Development of such applications is inherently complex due to these applications adapt to changing contextual information and they often run on resource-bounded devices. Most of the existing context-aware development frameworks are centralized, adopt client–server architecture, and do not consider resource limitations of context-aware devices. This paper presents a systematic framework to modelling and implementation of resource-bounded multi-agent context-aware systems on Android devices. The proposed framework makes use of semantic technologies for context modelling and reasoning about resource-bounded context-aware agents, Android powered smartphones as development platform, a suitable communication model and declarative rule-based programming as a preferred development language

A formal approach to modelling and verification of context-aware systems

The evolution of smart devices and software technologies has expanded the domain of computing from workplaces to other areas of our everyday life. This trend has been rapidly advancing towards ubiquitous computing environments, where smart devices play an important role in acting intelligently on behalf of the users. One of the sub fields of the ubiquitous computing is context-aware systems. In context-aware systems research, ontology and agent-based technology have emerged as a new paradigm for conceptualizing, designing, and implementing sophisticated software systems. These systems exhibit complex adaptive behaviors, run in highly decentralized environment and can naturally be implemented as agent-based systems. Usually context-aware systems run on tiny resource-bounded devices including smart phones and sensor nodes and hence face various challenges. The lack of formal frameworks in existing research presents a clear challenge to model and verify such systems. This thesis addresses some of these issues by developing formal logical frameworks for modelling and verifying rule-based context-aware multi-agent systems. Two logical frameworks LOCRS and LDROCS have been developed by extending CTL* with belief and communication modalities, which allow us to describe a set of rule-based context-aware reasoning agents with bound on time, memory and communication. The key idea underlying the logical approach of context-aware systems is to define a formal logic that axiomatizes the set of transition systems, and it is then used to state various qualitative and quantitative properties of the systems. The set of rules which are used to model a desired system is derived from OWL 2 RL ontologies. While LOCRS is based on monotonic reasoning where beliefs of an agent cannot be revised based on some contradictory evidence, the LDROCS logic handles inconsistent context information using non-monotonic reasoning. The modelling and verification of a healthcare case study is illustrated using Protégé IDE and Maude LTL model checker

A formal approach to modelling and verification of context-aware systems

The evolution of smart devices and software technologies has expanded the domain of computing from workplaces to other areas of our everyday life. This trend has been rapidly advancing towards ubiquitous computing environments, where smart devices play an important role in acting intelligently on behalf of the users. One of the sub fields of the ubiquitous computing is context-aware systems. In context-aware systems research, ontology and agent-based technology have emerged as a new paradigm for conceptualizing, designing, and implementing sophisticated software systems. These systems exhibit complex adaptive behaviors, run in highly decentralized environment and can naturally be implemented as agent-based systems. Usually context-aware systems run on tiny resource-bounded devices including smart phones and sensor nodes and hence face various challenges. The lack of formal frameworks in existing research presents a clear challenge to model and verify such systems. This thesis addresses some of these issues by developing formal logical frameworks for modelling and verifying rule-based context-aware multi-agent systems. Two logical frameworks LOCRS and LDROCS have been developed by extending CTL* with belief and communication modalities, which allow us to describe a set of rule-based context-aware reasoning agents with bound on time, memory and communication. The key idea underlying the logical approach of context-aware systems is to define a formal logic that axiomatizes the set of transition systems, and it is then used to state various qualitative and quantitative properties of the systems. The set of rules which are used to model a desired system is derived from OWL 2 RL ontologies. While LOCRS is based on monotonic reasoning where beliefs of an agent cannot be revised based on some contradictory evidence, the LDROCS logic handles inconsistent context information using non-monotonic reasoning. The modelling and verification of a healthcare case study is illustrated using Protégé IDE and Maude LTL model checker

Constraint rule-based programming of norms for electronic institutions

Peer reviewedPostprin

Logical models for bounded reasoners

This dissertation aims at the logical modelling of aspects of human reasoning, informed by facts on the bounds of human cognition. We break down this challenge into three parts. In Part I, we discuss the place of logical systems for knowledge and belief in the Rationality Debate and we argue for systems that formalize an alternative picture of rationality -- one wherein empirical facts have a key role (Chapter 2). In Part II, we design logical models that encode explicitly the deductive reasoning of a single bounded agent and the variety of processes underlying it. This is achieved through the introduction of a dynamic, resource-sensitive, impossible-worlds semantics (Chapter 3). We then show that this type of semantics can be combined with plausibility models (Chapter 4) and that it can be instrumental in modelling the logical aspects of System 1 (“fast”) and System 2 (“slow”) cognitive processes (Chapter 5). In Part III, we move from single- to multi-agent frameworks. This unfolds in three directions: (a) the formation of beliefs about others (e.g. due to observation, memory, and communication), (b) the manipulation of beliefs (e.g. via acts of reasoning about oneself and others), and (c) the effect of the above on group reasoning. These questions are addressed, respectively, in Chapters 6, 7, and 8. We finally discuss directions for future work and we reflect on the contribution of the thesis as a whole (Chapter 9)