4,719 research outputs found
A System for Induction of Oblique Decision Trees
This article describes a new system for induction of oblique decision trees.
This system, OC1, combines deterministic hill-climbing with two forms of
randomization to find a good oblique split (in the form of a hyperplane) at
each node of a decision tree. Oblique decision tree methods are tuned
especially for domains in which the attributes are numeric, although they can
be adapted to symbolic or mixed symbolic/numeric attributes. We present
extensive empirical studies, using both real and artificial data, that analyze
OC1's ability to construct oblique trees that are smaller and more accurate
than their axis-parallel counterparts. We also examine the benefits of
randomization for the construction of oblique decision trees.Comment: See http://www.jair.org/ for an online appendix and other files
accompanying this articl
Inducing safer oblique trees without costs
Decision tree induction has been widely studied and applied. In safety applications, such as determining whether a chemical process is safe or whether a person has a medical condition, the cost of misclassification in one of the classes is significantly higher than in the other class. Several authors have tackled this problem by developing cost-sensitive decision tree learning algorithms or have suggested ways of changing the
distribution of training examples to bias the decision tree learning process so as to take account of costs. A prerequisite for applying such algorithms is the availability of costs of misclassification.
Although this may be possible for some applications, obtaining reasonable estimates of costs of misclassification is not easy in the area of safety.
This paper presents a new algorithm for applications where the cost of misclassifications cannot be quantified, although the cost of misclassification in one class is known to be significantly higher than in another class. The algorithm utilizes linear discriminant analysis to identify oblique relationships between continuous attributes and then carries out an appropriate modification to ensure that the resulting tree errs on the side of safety. The algorithm is evaluated with respect to one of the best known cost-sensitive algorithms (ICET), a well-known oblique decision tree algorithm (OC1) and an algorithm that utilizes robust linear programming
TreeGrad: Transferring Tree Ensembles to Neural Networks
Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) are popular machine learning
algorithms with implementations such as LightGBM and in popular machine
learning toolkits like Scikit-Learn. Many implementations can only produce
trees in an offline manner and in a greedy manner. We explore ways to convert
existing GBDT implementations to known neural network architectures with
minimal performance loss in order to allow decision splits to be updated in an
online manner and provide extensions to allow splits points to be altered as a
neural architecture search problem. We provide learning bounds for our neural
network.Comment: Technical Report on Implementation of Deep Neural Decision Forests
Algorithm. To accompany implementation here:
https://github.com/chappers/TreeGrad. Update: Please cite as: Siu, C. (2019).
"Transferring Tree Ensembles to Neural Networks". International Conference on
Neural Information Processing. Springer, 2019. arXiv admin note: text overlap
with arXiv:1909.1179
CSNL: A cost-sensitive non-linear decision tree algorithm
This article presents a new decision tree learning algorithm called CSNL that induces Cost-Sensitive Non-Linear decision trees. The algorithm is based on the hypothesis that nonlinear decision nodes provide a better basis than axis-parallel decision nodes and utilizes discriminant analysis to construct nonlinear decision trees that take account of costs of misclassification.
The performance of the algorithm is evaluated by applying it to seventeen datasets and the results are compared with those obtained by two well known cost-sensitive algorithms, ICET and MetaCost, which generate multiple trees to obtain some of the best results to date. The results show that CSNL performs at least as well, if not better than these algorithms, in more than twelve of the datasets and is considerably faster. The use of bagging with CSNL further enhances its performance showing the significant benefits of using nonlinear decision nodes.
The performance of the algorithm is evaluated by applying it to seventeen data sets and the results are
compared with those obtained by two well known cost-sensitive algorithms, ICET and MetaCost, which generate multiple trees to obtain some of the best results to date.
The results show that CSNL performs at least as well, if not better than these algorithms, in more than twelve of the data sets and is considerably faster.
The use of bagging with CSNL further enhances its performance showing the significant benefits of using non-linear decision nodes
Using rule extraction to improve the comprehensibility of predictive models.
Whereas newer machine learning techniques, like artifficial neural net-works and support vector machines, have shown superior performance in various benchmarking studies, the application of these techniques remains largely restricted to research environments. A more widespread adoption of these techniques is foiled by their lack of explanation capability which is required in some application areas, like medical diagnosis or credit scoring. To overcome this restriction, various algorithms have been proposed to extract a meaningful description of the underlying `blackbox' models. These algorithms' dual goal is to mimic the behavior of the black box as closely as possible while at the same time they have to ensure that the extracted description is maximally comprehensible. In this research report, we first develop a formal definition of`rule extraction and comment on the inherent trade-off between accuracy and comprehensibility. Afterwards, we develop a taxonomy by which rule extraction algorithms can be classiffied and discuss some criteria by which these algorithms can be evaluated. Finally, an in-depth review of the most important algorithms is given.This report is concluded by pointing out some general shortcomings of existing techniques and opportunities for future research.Models; Model; Algorithms; Criteria; Opportunities; Research; Learning; Neural networks; Networks; Performance; Benchmarking; Studies; Area; Credit; Credit scoring; Behavior; Time;
- …