340 research outputs found

    Defining Adaptive Learning Paths For Competence-Oriented Learning

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a way to describe educational itineraries in a competence-oriented learning system in order to solve the problem of sequencing several independent courses. The main objective is to extract adaptive learning paths composed by the subset of needed courses passed in the right order. This approach improves the courses’ re-usability allowing courses to be included in different itineraries, improving the re-usability of the courses, and making possible the definition of mechanisms to adapt the learning path to the learner’s needs in execution tim

    Learning design Rashomon I – supporting the design of one lesson through different approaches

    Get PDF
    This paper presents and compares a variety of approaches that have been developed to guide the decision-making process in learning design. Together with the companion Learning Design Rashomon II (Prieto et al., 2013), devoted to existing tools to support the same process, it aims to provide a view on relevant research 20 results in this field. The common thread followed in these two contributions is inspired by Kurosawa’s Rashomon film, which takes multiple perspectives on the same action. Similarly, in this paper, Rashomon I, a lesson on ‘‘Healthy Eating’’ is analysed according to five different approaches, while the Rashomon II paper is used to exemplify the affordances of different tools. For this reason, this paper does not follow the conventional structure of research papers (research question, method, results and discussion), but rather it moves from an introduction providing the rationale for the paper, to a description of the five different approaches to learning design (the 4SPPIces Model, the 4Ts, the e-Design Template, the Design Principles Database and the Design Narrative) and then to a discussion of their 30 similarities and differences to inform the choice of potential users

    The FuturICT education accelerator

    Get PDF
    Education is a major force for economic and social wellbeing. Despite high aspirations, education at all levels can be expensive and ineffective. Three Grand Challenges are identified: (1) enable people to learn orders of magnitude more effectively, (2) enable people to learn at orders of magnitude less cost, and (3) demonstrate success by exemplary interdisciplinary education in complex systems science. A ten year ‘man-on-the-moon’ project is proposed in which FuturICT’s unique combination of Complexity, Social and Computing Sciences could provide an urgently needed transdisciplinary language for making sense of educational systems. In close dialogue with educational theory and practice, and grounded in the emerging data science and learning analytics paradigms, this will translate into practical tools (both analytical and computational) for researchers, practitioners and leaders; generative principles for resilient educational ecosystems; and innovation for radically scalable, yet personalised, learner engagement and assessment. The proposed Education Accelerator will serve as a ‘wind tunnel’ for testing these ideas in the context of real educational programmes, with an international virtual campus delivering complex systems education exploiting the new understanding of complex, social, computationally enhanced organisational structure developed within FuturICT

    Sequencing of learning activities oriented towards reuse and auto-organization for intelligent tutoring systems

    Get PDF
    Three have been the main contributions of this thesis. First, a platform for the deployment of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) with a modular architecture has been designed. This platform, called SIT, focuses on the adaptation of the sequencing of learning content, not adaptation of the content itself. This separation permits specialization of pedagogical experts and encourages reuse of learning resources. Second, a tool for the adaptation of the sequencing of learning units has been presented: Sequencing Graphs. It is a specialization of the finite automata paradigm, adapted for the specific needs of learning. Sequencing graphs focus on reuse, both of learning units and of adaptive sequencings definitions. They are hierarchical to prevent scalability problems. Two ITS have developed using sequencing graphs for SIT. Experimental results support the hypothesis that sequencing adaptation has a good influence on learning and that Sequencing Graphs are a useful tool to achieve this objective. Finally, the thesis analyzes the current initiatives in the emerging field of swarm intelligence techniques in education. Apart of the theoretical overview, three results are presented: an experimental study performed on the Paraschool system, a system of pedagogical alarms based on learning pheromones on the same system, and a swarm paths information module for SIT. This module synthesizes the best results from swarm-based adaptation sequencing and collaborative filtering for providing an additional level of adaptation to the content sequencing in SI

    The FuturICT education accelerator

    Get PDF
    Education is a major force for economic and social wellbeing. Despite high aspirations, education at all levels can be expensive and ineffective. Three Grand Challenges are identified: (1) enable people to learn orders of magnitude more effectively, (2) enable people to learn at orders of magnitude less cost, and (3) demonstrate success by exemplary interdisciplinary education in complex systems science. A ten year ‘man-on-the-moon’ project is proposed in which FuturICT’s unique combination of Complexity, Social and Computing Sciences could provide an urgently needed transdisciplinary language for making sense of educational systems. In close dialogue with educational theory and practice, and grounded in the emerging data science and learning analytics paradigms, this will translate into practical tools (both analytical and computational) for researchers, practitioners and leaders; generative principles for resilient educational ecosystems; and innovation for radically scalable, yet personalised, learner engagement and assessment. The proposed Education Accelerator will serve as a ‘wind tunnel’ for testing these ideas in the context of real educational programmes, with an international virtual campus delivering complex systems education exploiting the new understanding of complex, social, computationally enhanced organisational structure developed within FuturICT

    ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus

    Get PDF
    [EN] Business progress and human development are linked to the efficient management of energy resources. The research in this paper contributes to the generalized application of good practices that reduce the vulnerability of companies. The research focuses on energy efficiency through comprehensive management systems (CMS), and "thought based on risks and opportunities", considering the discussion about the revision of ISO 50001:2018, the basic approach of the model and the route to implement CMS for quality, safety and health in the workplace, environmental management, energy efficiency, and other risk components. This implementation route, with the acronym CMS QHSE3+, places special emphasis on the functions of strategic planning, operational and risk management, and controls, as well as on deliverables and references to examples, templates, standards, and documents, to facilitate its application general in small and medium enterprises and in the management of energy efficiency.We express our gratitude for the support received, to CAJACOPI ATLÁNTICO, QUARA Group, ASTEQ Technology, Simón Bolivar University, the Universitat Politècnica de València, SANTO TORIBIO Business Group, and to all the personalities and companies who offered us their contributions and their valuable points of view.Poveda-Orjuela, PP.; García-Díaz, JC.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; Cañón-Zabala, G. (2019). ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies. 12(24):1-33. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244700S1331224Strategic Business Plan 2017https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/687806/ISO_ TC_301_Energy_management_and_energy_saving.pdf?nodeid=19278553&vernum=-2Directives and Policies Ninth Edition, Part 2. Official Rules to Develop an ISO Standardwww.iso.org/directives-and-policies.htmlStandards by ISO/TC 301https://www.iso.org/committee/6077221.htmlCEM Advancing Clean Energy Together, Ministerial Meetingshttps://www.cleanenergyministerial.org/events-Clean-Energy-Ministerial. CEM 01 to CEM 10Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development OECDhttps://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=70734Strategic Plan 2016–2020. Bruxelles: CEEhttps://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/august/tradoc_154919.pdfChaos Reporthttp://www.laboratorioti.com /2016/05/16/informe-del-caos-2015-chaos-report-2015-bien-malfueron-los-proyectos-ano-2015/Oliva, F. L. (2016). A maturity model for enterprise risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 66-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.007Thekdi, S., & Aven, T. (2016). An enhanced data-analytic framework for integrating risk management and performance management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 156, 277-287. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.010Aven, T., & Krohn, B. S. (2014). A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 121, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.005Wilson, J. P., & Campbell, L. (2018). ISO 9001:2015: the evolution and convergence of quality management and knowledge management for competitive advantage. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(7-8), 761-776. doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1445965Ciravegna Martins da Fonseca, L. M. (2015). ISO 14001:2015: An improved tool for sustainability. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(1). doi:10.3926/jiem.1298Cosgrove, J., Littlewood, J., & Wilgeroth, P. (2017). Development of a framework of key performance indicators to identify reductions in energy consumption in a medical devices production facility. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 39(2), 202-210. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1278718Castrillón Mendoza, R., Rey Hernández, J., Velasco Gómez, E., San José Alonso, J., & Rey Martínez, F. (2018). Analysis of the Methodology to Obtain Several Key Indicators Performance (KIP), by Energy Retrofitting of the Actual Building to the District Heating Fuelled by Biomass, Focusing on nZEB Goal: Case of Study. Energies, 12(1), 93. doi:10.3390/en12010093Chiu, T.-Y., Lo, S.-L., & Tsai, Y.-Y. (2012). Establishing an Integration-Energy-Practice Model for Improving Energy Performance Indicators in ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems. Energies, 5(12), 5324-5339. doi:10.3390/en5125324Laskurain, I., Ibarloza, A., Larrea, A., & Allur, E. (2017). Contribution to Energy Management of the Main Standards for Environmental Management Systems: The Case of ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies, 10(11), 1758. doi:10.3390/en10111758Al-Sakkaf, S., Kassas, M., Khalid, M., & Abido, M. A. (2019). An Energy Management System for Residential Autonomous DC Microgrid Using Optimized Fuzzy Logic Controller Considering Economic Dispatch. Energies, 12(8), 1457. doi:10.3390/en12081457Zobel, T., & Malmgren, C. (2016). Evaluating the Management System Approach for Industrial Energy Efficiency Improvements. Energies, 9(10), 774. doi:10.3390/en9100774Laskurain, I., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Casadesús, M. (2015). Fostering renewable energy sources by standards for environmental and energy management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1148-1156. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.050Stoeglehner, G., Niemetz, N., & Kettl, K.-H. (2011). Spatial dimensions of sustainable energy systems: new visions for integrated spatial and energy planning. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 1(1). doi:10.1186/2192-0567-1-2Calvillo, C. F., Sánchez-Miralles, A., & Villar, J. (2016). Energy management and planning in smart cities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55, 273-287. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133Blaauwbroek, N., Nguyen, P. H., Konsman, M. J., Shi, H., Kamphuis, R. I. G., & Kling, W. L. (2015). Decentralized Resource Allocation and Load Scheduling for Multicommodity Smart Energy Systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6(4), 1506-1514. doi:10.1109/tste.2015.2441107Mao, M., Jin, P., Hatziargyriou, N. D., & Chang, L. (2014). Multiagent-Based Hybrid Energy Management System for Microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 1-1. doi:10.1109/tste.2014.2313882Carli, R., & Dotoli, M. (2019). Decentralized control for residential energy management of a smart users microgrid with renewable energy exchange. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 6(3), 641-656. doi:10.1109/jas.2019.1911462The ISO 27k Forumhttps://www.iso27001 security.com/html/iso27000.htmlIntroduction to the Basic Concepts of General Systems Theory. Cinta de Moebiohttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10100306Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science, 111(2872), 23-29. doi:10.1126/science.111.2872.23Hernandis Ortuño, B., & Briede Westermeyer, J. C. (2009). AN EDUCATIONAL APPLICATION FOR A PRODUCT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS USING INTEGRATED CONCEPTUAL MODELS. Ingeniare. Revista chilena de ingeniería, 17(3). doi:10.4067/s0718-33052009000300017Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160-180. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001Conceptual Model and Route to Implement a Comprehensive Management System QHSE3+, in New Trends in Operations Research and Administrative Sciences. An Approach from Latin American Studieshttps://bonga.unisimon.edu.co/handle/20.500.12442/2601Golini, R., Kalchschmidt, M., & Landoni, P. (2015). Adoption of project management practices: The impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 650-663. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.09.006Marcelino-Sádaba, S., González-Jaen, L. F., & Pérez-Ezcurdia, A. (2015). Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020Archer, N. ., & Ghasemzadeh, F. (1999). An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 207-216. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00032-5Velásquez-Restrepo, S. M., Londoño-Gallego, J. A., López-Romero, C., & Vahos, J. D. (2018). Desarrollo de una plataforma web multimedial para la elaboración de proyectos bajo la metodología de marco lógico. Lámpsakos, 1(18), 12. doi:10.21501/21454086.2601Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363-373. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00060-1San Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and Project Management: A General Overview. Complexity, 2018, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2018/4891286Ramasesh, R. V., & Browning, T. R. (2014). A conceptual framework for tackling knowable unknown unknowns in project management. Journal of Operations Management, 32(4), 190-204. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.03.003Pollack, J. (2007). The changing paradigms of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 266-274. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.002Lamers, M. (2002). Do you manage a project, or what? A reply to «Do you manage work, deliverables or resources», International Journal of Project Management, April 2000. International Journal of Project Management, 20(4), 325-329. doi:10.1016/s0263-7863(00)00053-3Torabi, S. A., Giahi, R., & Sahebjamnia, N. (2016). An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems. Safety Science, 89, 201-218. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.015Baccarini, D. (1999). The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32. doi:10.1177/875697289903000405Casals, M., Gangolells, M., Forcada, N., Macarulla, M., Giretti, A., & Vaccarini, M. (2016). SEAM4US: An intelligent energy management system for underground stations. Applied Energy, 166, 150-164. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.029Matrawy, K. K., Mahrous, A.-F., & Youssef, M. S. (2015). Energy management and parametric optimization of an integrated PV solar house. Energy Conversion and Management, 96, 377-383. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2015.02.088Kyriakarakos, G., Dounis, A. I., Arvanitis, K. G., & Papadakis, G. (2012). A fuzzy logic energy management system for polygeneration microgrids. Renewable Energy, 41, 315-327. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.019Johansson, M. T., & Thollander, P. (2018). A review of barriers to and driving forces for improved energy efficiency in Swedish industry– Recommendations for successful in-house energy management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 618-628. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.052Jovanović, B., & Filipović, J. (2016). ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model – proposal and validation in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2744-2755. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.023Majernik, M., Bosak, M., Stofova, L., & Szaryszova, P. (2015). INNOVATIVE MODEL OF INTEGRATED ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN COMPANIES. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(1). doi:10.12776/qip.v19i1.384Implementation of ISO 50001 in Industry in The Netherlands. ECEE Industry Summer Studywww.eceee.orgDe Groot, H. L. F., Verhoef, E. T., & Nijkamp, P. (2001). Energy saving by firms: decision-making, barriers and policies. Energy Economics, 23(6), 717-740. doi:10.1016/s0140-9883(01)00083-4Development of the EMAS Sectoral Reference Documents on Best Environmental Management Practice. Learning from Frontrunners Promoting Best Practice. Publications Office of the European Unionhttps://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC84966/lfna26291enn.pd

    Computer Science & Technology Series : XXI Argentine Congress of Computer Science. Selected papers

    Get PDF
    CACIC’15 was the 21thCongress in the CACIC series. It was organized by the School of Technology at the UNNOBA (North-West of Buenos Aires National University) in Junín, Buenos Aires. The Congress included 13 Workshops with 131 accepted papers, 4 Conferences, 2 invited tutorials, different meetings related with Computer Science Education (Professors, PhD students, Curricula) and an International School with 6 courses. CACIC 2015 was organized following the traditional Congress format, with 13 Workshops covering a diversity of dimensions of Computer Science Research. Each topic was supervised by a committee of 3-5 chairs of different Universities. The call for papers attracted a total of 202 submissions. An average of 2.5 review reports werecollected for each paper, for a grand total of 495 review reports that involved about 191 different reviewers. A total of 131 full papers, involving 404 authors and 75 Universities, were accepted and 24 of them were selected for this book.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI

    Computer Science & Technology Series : XXI Argentine Congress of Computer Science. Selected papers

    Get PDF
    CACIC’15 was the 21thCongress in the CACIC series. It was organized by the School of Technology at the UNNOBA (North-West of Buenos Aires National University) in Junín, Buenos Aires. The Congress included 13 Workshops with 131 accepted papers, 4 Conferences, 2 invited tutorials, different meetings related with Computer Science Education (Professors, PhD students, Curricula) and an International School with 6 courses. CACIC 2015 was organized following the traditional Congress format, with 13 Workshops covering a diversity of dimensions of Computer Science Research. Each topic was supervised by a committee of 3-5 chairs of different Universities. The call for papers attracted a total of 202 submissions. An average of 2.5 review reports werecollected for each paper, for a grand total of 495 review reports that involved about 191 different reviewers. A total of 131 full papers, involving 404 authors and 75 Universities, were accepted and 24 of them were selected for this book.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI

    SciTech News- 69(2)-2015

    Get PDF
    Columns and Reports From the Editor..........................................5 SciTech News Call for Articles.......................5 Division News Science-Technology Division.........................6 Chemistry Division.................................... 15 Engineering Division................................. 21 Aerospace Section of the Engineering Division................... 25 Architecture, Building Engineering, Construction and Design Section of the Engineering Division................... 26 Award & Other Announcements Stacey Mantooth Receives 2015 Marion E. Sparks Award for Professional Development...................................... 17 Engineering Division Awards Recipients....... 24 Engineering Division Mentoring Program...... 26 Conference Reports Post International Chemical Congress Report Held in Malaysia and Vietnam 2014, by Malarvili Ramalingam, PhD............... 18 Reviews Sci-Tech Book News Reviews...................... 2
    corecore