4,507 research outputs found
The Connectivity of Boolean Satisfiability: Dichotomies for Formulas and Circuits
For Boolean satisfiability problems, the structure of the solution space is
characterized by the solution graph, where the vertices are the solutions, and
two solutions are connected iff they differ in exactly one variable. In 2006,
Gopalan et al. studied connectivity properties of the solution graph and
related complexity issues for CSPs, motivated mainly by research on
satisfiability algorithms and the satisfiability threshold. They proved
dichotomies for the diameter of connected components and for the complexity of
the st-connectivity question, and conjectured a trichotomy for the connectivity
question. Recently, we were able to establish the trichotomy [arXiv:1312.4524].
Here, we consider connectivity issues of satisfiability problems defined by
Boolean circuits and propositional formulas that use gates, resp. connectives,
from a fixed set of Boolean functions. We obtain dichotomies for the diameter
and the two connectivity problems: on one side, the diameter is linear in the
number of variables, and both problems are in P, while on the other side, the
diameter can be exponential, and the problems are PSPACE-complete. For
partially quantified formulas, we show an analogous dichotomy.Comment: 20 pages, several improvement
Message passing for quantified Boolean formulas
We introduce two types of message passing algorithms for quantified Boolean
formulas (QBF). The first type is a message passing based heuristics that can
prove unsatisfiability of the QBF by assigning the universal variables in such
a way that the remaining formula is unsatisfiable. In the second type, we use
message passing to guide branching heuristics of a Davis-Putnam
Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) complete solver. Numerical experiments show that on
random QBFs our branching heuristics gives robust exponential efficiency gain
with respect to the state-of-art solvers. We also manage to solve some
previously unsolved benchmarks from the QBFLIB library. Apart from this our
study sheds light on using message passing in small systems and as subroutines
in complete solvers.Comment: 14 pages, 7 figure
Strong ETH Breaks With Merlin and Arthur: Short Non-Interactive Proofs of Batch Evaluation
We present an efficient proof system for Multipoint Arithmetic Circuit
Evaluation: for every arithmetic circuit of size and
degree over a field , and any inputs ,
the Prover sends the Verifier the values and a proof of length, and
the Verifier tosses coins and can check the proof in about time, with probability of error less than .
For small degree , this "Merlin-Arthur" proof system (a.k.a. MA-proof
system) runs in nearly-linear time, and has many applications. For example, we
obtain MA-proof systems that run in time (for various ) for the
Permanent, Circuit-SAT for all sublinear-depth circuits, counting
Hamiltonian cycles, and infeasibility of - linear programs. In general,
the value of any polynomial in Valiant's class can be certified
faster than "exhaustive summation" over all possible assignments. These results
strongly refute a Merlin-Arthur Strong ETH and Arthur-Merlin Strong ETH posed
by Russell Impagliazzo and others.
We also give a three-round (AMA) proof system for quantified Boolean formulas
running in time, nearly-linear time MA-proof systems for
counting orthogonal vectors in a collection and finding Closest Pairs in the
Hamming metric, and a MA-proof system running in -time for
counting -cliques in graphs.
We point to some potential future directions for refuting the
Nondeterministic Strong ETH.Comment: 17 page
Circuit Complexity Meets Ontology-Based Data Access
Ontology-based data access is an approach to organizing access to a database
augmented with a logical theory. In this approach query answering proceeds
through a reformulation of a given query into a new one which can be answered
without any use of theory. Thus the problem reduces to the standard database
setting.
However, the size of the query may increase substantially during the
reformulation. In this survey we review a recently developed framework on
proving lower and upper bounds on the size of this reformulation by employing
methods and results from Boolean circuit complexity.Comment: To appear in proceedings of CSR 2015, LNCS 9139, Springe
From Quantified CTL to QBF
QCTL extends the temporal logic CTL with quantifications over atomic propositions. This extension is known to be very expressive: QCTL allows us to express complex properties over Kripke structures (it is as expressive as MSO). Several semantics exist for the quantifications: here, we work with the structure semantics, where the extra propositions label the Kripke structure (and not its execution tree), and the model-checking problem is known to be PSPACE-complete in this framework. We propose a model-checking algorithm for QCTL based on a reduction to QBF. We consider several reduction strategies, and we compare them with a prototype (based on the SMT-solver Z3) on several examples
Flow Logic
Flow networks have attracted a lot of research in computer science. Indeed,
many questions in numerous application areas can be reduced to questions about
flow networks. Many of these applications would benefit from a framework in
which one can formally reason about properties of flow networks that go beyond
their maximal flow. We introduce Flow Logics: modal logics that treat flow
functions as explicit first-order objects and enable the specification of rich
properties of flow networks. The syntax of our logic BFL* (Branching Flow
Logic) is similar to the syntax of the temporal logic CTL*, except that atomic
assertions may be flow propositions, like or , for
, which refer to the value of the flow in a vertex, and
that first-order quantification can be applied both to paths and to flow
functions. We present an exhaustive study of the theoretical and practical
aspects of BFL*, as well as extensions and fragments of it. Our extensions
include flow quantifications that range over non-integral flow functions or
over maximal flow functions, path quantification that ranges over paths along
which non-zero flow travels, past operators, and first-order quantification of
flow values. We focus on the model-checking problem and show that it is
PSPACE-complete, as it is for CTL*. Handling of flow quantifiers, however,
increases the complexity in terms of the network to , even
for the LFL and BFL fragments, which are the flow-counterparts of LTL and CTL.
We are still able to point to a useful fragment of BFL* for which the
model-checking problem can be solved in polynomial time. Finally, we introduce
and study the query-checking problem for BFL*, where under-specified BFL*
formulas are used for network exploration
Logic Meets Algebra: the Case of Regular Languages
The study of finite automata and regular languages is a privileged meeting
point of algebra and logic. Since the work of Buchi, regular languages have
been classified according to their descriptive complexity, i.e. the type of
logical formalism required to define them. The algebraic point of view on
automata is an essential complement of this classification: by providing
alternative, algebraic characterizations for the classes, it often yields the
only opportunity for the design of algorithms that decide expressibility in
some logical fragment.
We survey the existing results relating the expressibility of regular
languages in logical fragments of MSO[S] with algebraic properties of their
minimal automata. In particular, we show that many of the best known results in
this area share the same underlying mechanics and rely on a very strong
relation between logical substitutions and block-products of pseudovarieties of
monoid. We also explain the impact of these connections on circuit complexity
theory.Comment: 37 page
- …