Multiple preemptive EDCA for emergency medium access control in distributed WLANs

The increasingly use of wireless local area networks (WLANs) in public safety and emergency network services demands for a strict quality of service (QoS) guarantee especially a large number of users report an emergency for immediate channel access. Unfortunately, the traditional IEEE 802.11e-based enhanced distributed channel access (EDCA) does not support a strict QoS guarantee for life saving emergency traffic under high loads. Previous studies have attempted to enhance the performance of EDCA called the Channel Preemtive EDCA (CP-EDCA) which is a promising idea to support emergency traffic in WLANs. However, CP-EDCA supports a single emergency traffic only (i.e. no emergency service differentiation) with high delays for increased traffic loads. To overcome this problem, we propose a class of EDCA protocol called Multiple Preemption EDCA (MPEDCA) as a candidate to support multiple emergency traffics under high loads. Each MP-EDCA node can support up to four emergency traffics (life, health, property and environment) with different priorities in addition to support background (non-emergency) traffic. The proposed protocol privileged the high priority life-saving emergency traffic to preempt the services of low priority ones without much starvation in the network to maintain a strict QoS guarantee. The paper evaluates the performance of MPEDCA through an extensive analysis of simulation outcome. The results obtained show that MP-EDCA outperforms CP-EDCA in achieving lower medium access control and emergency node delays

Modeling and performance analysis of an alternative to IEEE 802.11e Hybrid Control Function

Modern wireless networks are offering a wide range of applications that require the efficient integration of multimedia and traditional data traffic along with QoS provision. The IEEE 802.11e workgroup has standardized a new QoS enhanced access scheme for wireless LANs, namely Hybrid Control Function (HCF). HCF consists of the Enhanced Distributed Channel Access (EDCA) and the Hybrid Control Channel Access (HCCA) protocols which manage to ensure QoS support. However, they exhibit specific weaknesses that limit network performance. This work analyzes an alternative protocol, called Priority Oriented Adaptive Polling (POAP). POAP is an integrated channel access mechanism, is collision free, it employs priorities to differentiate traffic in a proportional way, it provides fairness, and generally supports QoS for all types of multimedia applications, while efficiently serving background data traffic. POAP is compared to HCF in order to examine the wireless network performance when serving integrated traffic

Priority-Oriented Adaptive Control With QoS Guarantee for Wireless LANs.

In today’s wireless networks there is a great need for QoS, because of the time-bounded voice, audio and video traffic. A new QoS enhanced standard is being standardized by the IEEE 802.11e workgroup. It uses a contention free access mechanism called Hybrid Control Channel Access (HCCA) to guarantee QoS. However, HCCA is not efficient for all types of time-bounded traffic. This work proposes an alternative protocol which could be adapted in HCF (Hybrid Coordination Function). The Priority Oriented Adaptive Control with QoS Guarantee (POAC-QG) is a complete centralized channel access mechanism, it is able to guarantee QoS for all types of multimedia network applications, it enhances the parameterized traffic with priorities, and it supports time division access using slots. Furthermore, it instantly negotiates the quality levels of the traffic streams according to their priorities, supporting multiple streams to the best quality it can achieve. POAC-QG compared to HCCA, provides higher channel utilization, adapts better to the characteristics of the different traffic types, differentiates the traffic streams more efficiently using priorities, and generally exhibits superior performance

Comparative Analysis of QoS Guarantee on IEEE 802.11e and IEEE 802.11g Wireless Local Area Networks

For this project, we propose to compare the 802.11g and the 802.11e Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs). The 802.11g WLAN standards are good for data applications. However, the 802.11g standard is not well-equipped to deal with the intended delay and bandwidth requirements of multimedia applications, such as video and voice over wireless IP. For this reason, an approved amendment (802.11e) was added to the IEEE 802.11 standard. The 802.11e implements Quality of Service (QoS), which enables features through changes in the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer. The performance of 802.11e will be evaluated using OPNET simulation and compared with the 802.11g WLAN standard.   Keyword: QoS, IEEE 802.11, WLAN, MAC, OPNET, WiFi, CSMA/CA