1,621 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models
The development of automated (computer-based) calibration methods has focused mainly on the selection of a single-objective measure of the distance between the model-simulated output and the data and the selection of an automatic optimization algorithm to search for the parameter values which minimize that distance. However, practical experience with model calibration suggests that no single-objective function is adequate to measure the ways in which the model fails to match the important characteristics of the observed data. Given that some of the latest hydrologic models simulate several of the watershed output fluxes (e.g. water, energy, chemical constituents, etc.), there is a need for effective and efficient multi-objective calibration procedures capable of exploiting all of the useful information about the physical system contained in the measurement data time series. The MOCOM-UA algorithm, an effective and efficient methodology for solving the multiple-objective global optimization problem, is presented in this paper. The method is an extension of the successful SCE-UA single-objective global optimization algorithm. The features and capabilities of MOCOM-UA are illustrated by means of a simple hydrologic model calibration study
Rank-Based Learning and Local Model Based Evolutionary Algorithm for High-Dimensional Expensive Multi-Objective Problems
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms have been widely developed to
solve complex and computationally expensive multi-objective optimization
problems in recent years. However, when dealing with high-dimensional
optimization problems, the performance of these surrogate-assisted
multi-objective evolutionary algorithms deteriorate drastically. In this work,
a novel Classifier-assisted rank-based learning and Local Model based
multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (CLMEA) is proposed for high-dimensional
expensive multi-objective optimization problems. The proposed algorithm
consists of three parts: classifier-assisted rank-based learning,
hypervolume-based non-dominated search, and local search in the relatively
sparse objective space. Specifically, a probabilistic neural network is built
as classifier to divide the offspring into a number of ranks. The offspring in
different ranks uses rank-based learning strategy to generate more promising
and informative candidates for real function evaluations. Then, radial basis
function networks are built as surrogates to approximate the objective
functions. After searching non-dominated solutions assisted by the surrogate
model, the candidates with higher hypervolume improvement are selected for real
evaluations. Subsequently, in order to maintain the diversity of solutions, the
most uncertain sample point from the non-dominated solutions measured by the
crowding distance is selected as the guided parent to further infill in the
uncertain region of the front. The experimental results of benchmark problems
and a real-world application on geothermal reservoir heat extraction
optimization demonstrate that the proposed algorithm shows superior performance
compared with the state-of-the-art surrogate-assisted multi-objective
evolutionary algorithms. The source code for this work is available at
https://github.com/JellyChen7/CLMEA
Scalarizing Functions in Bayesian Multiobjective Optimization
Scalarizing functions have been widely used to convert a multiobjective
optimization problem into a single objective optimization problem. However,
their use in solving (computationally) expensive multi- and many-objective
optimization problems in Bayesian multiobjective optimization is scarce.
Scalarizing functions can play a crucial role on the quality and number of
evaluations required when doing the optimization. In this article, we study and
review 15 different scalarizing functions in the framework of Bayesian
multiobjective optimization and build Gaussian process models (as surrogates,
metamodels or emulators) on them. We use expected improvement as infill
criterion (or acquisition function) to update the models. In particular, we
compare different scalarizing functions and analyze their performance on
several benchmark problems with different number of objectives to be optimized.
The review and experiments on different functions provide useful insights when
using and selecting a scalarizing function when using a Bayesian multiobjective
optimization method
Multiobjective global surrogate modeling, dealing with the 5-percent problem
When dealing with computationally expensive simulation codes or process measurement data, surrogate modeling methods are firmly established as facilitators for design space exploration, sensitivity analysis, visualization, prototyping and optimization. Typically the model parameter (=hyperparameter) optimization problem as part of global surrogate modeling is formulated in a single objective way. Models are generated according to a single objective (accuracy). However, this requires an engineer to determine a single accuracy target and measure upfront, which is hard to do if the behavior of the response is unknown. Likewise, the different outputs of a multi-output system are typically modeled separately by independent models. Again, a multiobjective approach would benefit the domain expert by giving information about output correlation and enabling automatic model type selection for each output dynamically. With this paper the authors attempt to increase awareness of the subtleties involved and discuss a number of solutions and applications. In particular, we present a multiobjective framework for global surrogate model generation to help tackle both problems and that is applicable in both the static and sequential design (adaptive sampling) case
A Random Forest Assisted Evolutionary Algorithm for Data-Driven Constrained Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization of Trauma Systems for publication
Many real-world optimization problems can be
solved by using the data-driven approach only, simply because no
analytic objective functions are available for evaluating candidate
solutions. In this work, we address a class of expensive datadriven
constrained multi-objective combinatorial optimization
problems, where the objectives and constraints can be calculated
only on the basis of large amount of data. To solve this class
of problems, we propose to use random forests and radial basis
function networks as surrogates to approximate both objective
and constraint functions. In addition, logistic regression models
are introduced to rectify the surrogate-assisted fitness evaluations
and a stochastic ranking selection is adopted to further reduce
the influences of the approximated constraint functions. Three
variants of the proposed algorithm are empirically evaluated on
multi-objective knapsack benchmark problems and two realworld
trauma system design problems. Experimental results
demonstrate that the variant using random forest models as
the surrogates are effective and efficient in solving data-driven
constrained multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems
A survey on handling computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems with evolutionary algorithms
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record.Evolutionary algorithms are widely used for solving multiobjective optimization problems but are often criticized because of a large number of function evaluations needed. Approximations, especially function approximations, also referred to as surrogates or metamodels are commonly used in the literature to reduce the computation time. This paper presents a survey of 45 different recent algorithms proposed in the literature between 2008 and 2016 to handle computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems. Several algorithms are discussed based on what kind of an approximation such as problem, function or fitness approximation they use. Most emphasis is given to function approximation-based algorithms. We also compare these algorithms based on different criteria such as metamodeling technique and evolutionary algorithm used, type and dimensions of the problem solved, handling constraints, training time and the type of evolution control. Furthermore, we identify and discuss some promising elements and major issues among algorithms in the literature related to using an approximation and numerical settings used. In addition, we discuss selecting an algorithm to solve a given computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problem based on the dimensions in both objective and decision spaces and the computation budget available.The research of Tinkle Chugh was funded by the COMAS Doctoral Program (at the University of Jyväskylä) and FiDiPro Project DeCoMo (funded by Tekes, the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation), and the research of Dr. Karthik Sindhya was funded by SIMPRO project funded by Tekes as well as DeCoMo
Multiobjective Stochastic Optimization of Dividing-wall Distillation Columns Using a Surrogate Model Based on Neural Networks
Surrogate models have been used for modelling and optimization of conventional chemical processes; among them, neural networks have a great potential to capture complex problems such as those found in chemical processes. However, the development of intensified processes has brought about important challenges in modelling and optimization, due to more complex interrelation between design variables. Among intensified processes, dividing-wall columns represent an interesting alternative for fluid mixtures separation, allowing savings in space requirements, energy and investments costs, in comparison with conventional sequences. In this work, we propose the optimization of dividing-wall columns, with a multiobjective genetic algorithm, through the use of neural networks as surrogate models. The contribution of this work is focused on the evaluation of both objectives and constraints functions with neural networks. The results show a significant reduction in computational time and the number of evaluations of objectives and constraints functions required to reaching the Pareto front
An Ensemble Surrogate-Based Framework for Expensive Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization
Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) have become very popular for tackling computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems (EMOPs), as the surrogate models in SAEAs can approximate EMOPs well, thereby reducing the time cost of the optimization process. However, with the increased number of decision variables in EMOPs, the prediction accuracy of surrogate models will deteriorate, which inevitably worsens the performance of SAEAs. To deal with this issue, this article suggests an ensemble surrogate-based framework for tackling EMOPs. In this framework, a global surrogate model is trained under the entire search space to explore the global area, while a number of surrogate submodels are trained under different search subspaces to exploit the subarea, so as to enhance the prediction accuracy and reliability. Moreover, a new infill sampling criterion is designed based on a set of reference vectors to select promising samples for training the models. To validate the generality and effectiveness of our framework, three state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms [nondominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III), multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition with differential evolution (MOEA/D-DE) and reference vector-guided evolutionary algorithm (RVEA)] are embedded, which significantly improve their performance for solving most of the test EMOPs adopted in this article. When compared to some competitive SAEAs for solving EMOPs with up to 30 decision variables, the experimental results also validate the advantages of our approach in most cases
State-of-the-art in aerodynamic shape optimisation methods
Aerodynamic optimisation has become an indispensable component for any aerodynamic design over the past 60 years, with applications to aircraft, cars, trains, bridges, wind turbines, internal pipe flows, and cavities, among others, and is thus relevant in many facets of technology. With advancements in computational power, automated design optimisation procedures have become more competent, however, there is an ambiguity and bias throughout the literature with regards to relative performance of optimisation architectures and employed algorithms. This paper provides a well-balanced critical review of the dominant optimisation approaches that have been integrated with aerodynamic theory for the purpose of shape optimisation. A total of 229 papers, published in more than 120 journals and conference proceedings, have been classified into 6 different optimisation algorithm approaches. The material cited includes some of the most well-established authors and publications in the field of aerodynamic optimisation. This paper aims to eliminate bias toward certain algorithms by analysing the limitations, drawbacks, and the benefits of the most utilised optimisation approaches. This review provides comprehensive but straightforward insight for non-specialists and reference detailing the current state for specialist practitioners
- …