9,461 research outputs found
On Quasi-Interpretations, Blind Abstractions and Implicit Complexity
Quasi-interpretations are a technique to guarantee complexity bounds on
first-order functional programs: with termination orderings they give in
particular a sufficient condition for a program to be executable in polynomial
time, called here the P-criterion. We study properties of the programs
satisfying the P-criterion, in order to better understand its intensional
expressive power. Given a program on binary lists, its blind abstraction is the
nondeterministic program obtained by replacing lists by their lengths (natural
numbers). A program is blindly polynomial if its blind abstraction terminates
in polynomial time. We show that all programs satisfying a variant of the
P-criterion are in fact blindly polynomial. Then we give two extensions of the
P-criterion: one by relaxing the termination ordering condition, and the other
one (the bounded value property) giving a necessary and sufficient condition
for a program to be polynomial time executable, with memoisation.Comment: 18 page
An integration of Euler's pentagonal partition
A recurrent formula is presented, for the enumeration of the compositions of
positive integers as sums over multisets of positive integers, that closely
resembles Euler's recurrence based on the pentagonal numbers, but where the
coefficients result from a discrete integration of Euler's coefficients. Both a
bijective proof and one based on generating functions show the equivalence of
the subject recurrences.Comment: 22 pages, 2 figures. The recurrence investigated in this paper is
essentially that proposed in Exercise 5.2.3 of Igor Pak's "Partition
bijections, a survey", Ramanujan J. 12 (2006), but casted in a different form
and, perhaps more interestingly, endowed with a bijective proof which arises
from a construction by induction on maximal part
Soundness of Unravelings for Conditional Term Rewriting Systems via Ultra-Properties Related to Linearity
Unravelings are transformations from a conditional term rewriting system
(CTRS, for short) over an original signature into an unconditional term
rewriting systems (TRS, for short) over an extended signature. They are not
sound w.r.t. reduction for every CTRS, while they are complete w.r.t.
reduction. Here, soundness w.r.t. reduction means that every reduction sequence
of the corresponding unraveled TRS, of which the initial and end terms are over
the original signature, can be simulated by the reduction of the original CTRS.
In this paper, we show that an optimized variant of Ohlebusch's unraveling for
a deterministic CTRS is sound w.r.t. reduction if the corresponding unraveled
TRS is left-linear or both right-linear and non-erasing. We also show that
soundness of the variant implies that of Ohlebusch's unraveling. Finally, we
show that soundness of Ohlebusch's unraveling is the weakest in soundness of
the other unravelings and a transformation, proposed by Serbanuta and Rosu, for
(normal) deterministic CTRSs, i.e., soundness of them respectively implies that
of Ohlebusch's unraveling.Comment: 49 pages, 1 table, publication in Special Issue: Selected papers of
the "22nd International Conference on Rewriting Techniques and Applications
(RTA'11)
On the confluence of lambda-calculus with conditional rewriting
The confluence of untyped \lambda-calculus with unconditional rewriting is
now well un- derstood. In this paper, we investigate the confluence of
\lambda-calculus with conditional rewriting and provide general results in two
directions. First, when conditional rules are algebraic. This extends results
of M\"uller and Dougherty for unconditional rewriting. Two cases are
considered, whether \beta-reduction is allowed or not in the evaluation of
conditions. Moreover, Dougherty's result is improved from the assumption of
strongly normalizing \beta-reduction to weakly normalizing \beta-reduction. We
also provide examples showing that outside these conditions, modularity of
confluence is difficult to achieve. Second, we go beyond the algebraic
framework and get new confluence results using a restricted notion of
orthogonality that takes advantage of the conditional part of rewrite rules
Size-Change Termination as a Contract
Termination is an important but undecidable program property, which has led
to a large body of work on static methods for conservatively predicting or
enforcing termination. One such method is the size-change termination approach
of Lee, Jones, and Ben-Amram, which operates in two phases: (1) abstract
programs into "size-change graphs," and (2) check these graphs for the
size-change property: the existence of paths that lead to infinite decreasing
sequences.
We transpose these two phases with an operational semantics that accounts for
the run-time enforcement of the size-change property, postponing (or entirely
avoiding) program abstraction. This choice has two key consequences: (1)
size-change termination can be checked at run-time and (2) termination can be
rephrased as a safety property analyzed using existing methods for systematic
abstraction.
We formulate run-time size-change checks as contracts in the style of Findler
and Felleisen. The result compliments existing contracts that enforce partial
correctness specifications to obtain contracts for total correctness. Our
approach combines the robustness of the size-change principle for termination
with the precise information available at run-time. It has tunable overhead and
can check for nontermination without the conservativeness necessary in static
checking. To obtain a sound and computable termination analysis, we apply
existing abstract interpretation techniques directly to the operational
semantics, avoiding the need for custom abstractions for termination. The
resulting analyzer is competitive with with existing, purpose-built analyzers
Synthesis of sup-interpretations: a survey
In this paper, we survey the complexity of distinct methods that allow the
programmer to synthesize a sup-interpretation, a function providing an upper-
bound on the size of the output values computed by a program. It consists in a
static space analysis tool without consideration of the time consumption.
Although clearly related, sup-interpretation is independent from termination
since it only provides an upper bound on the terminating computations. First,
we study some undecidable properties of sup-interpretations from a theoretical
point of view. Next, we fix term rewriting systems as our computational model
and we show that a sup-interpretation can be obtained through the use of a
well-known termination technique, the polynomial interpretations. The drawback
is that such a method only applies to total functions (strongly normalizing
programs). To overcome this problem we also study sup-interpretations through
the notion of quasi-interpretation. Quasi-interpretations also suffer from a
drawback that lies in the subterm property. This property drastically restricts
the shape of the considered functions. Again we overcome this problem by
introducing a new notion of interpretations mainly based on the dependency
pairs method. We study the decidability and complexity of the
sup-interpretation synthesis problem for all these three tools over sets of
polynomials. Finally, we take benefit of some previous works on termination and
runtime complexity to infer sup-interpretations.Comment: (2012
Polynomial Interpretations over the Natural, Rational and Real Numbers Revisited
Polynomial interpretations are a useful technique for proving termination of
term rewrite systems. They come in various flavors: polynomial interpretations
with real, rational and integer coefficients. As to their relationship with
respect to termination proving power, Lucas managed to prove in 2006 that there
are rewrite systems that can be shown polynomially terminating by polynomial
interpretations with real (algebraic) coefficients, but cannot be shown
polynomially terminating using polynomials with rational coefficients only. He
also proved the corresponding statement regarding the use of rational
coefficients versus integer coefficients. In this article we extend these
results, thereby giving the full picture of the relationship between the
aforementioned variants of polynomial interpretations. In particular, we show
that polynomial interpretations with real or rational coefficients do not
subsume polynomial interpretations with integer coefficients. Our results hold
also for incremental termination proofs with polynomial interpretations.Comment: 28 pages; special issue of RTA 201
Observation of implicit complexity by non confluence
We propose to consider non confluence with respect to implicit complexity. We
come back to some well known classes of first-order functional program, for
which we have a characterization of their intentional properties, namely the
class of cons-free programs, the class of programs with an interpretation, and
the class of programs with a quasi-interpretation together with a termination
proof by the product path ordering. They all correspond to PTIME. We prove that
adding non confluence to the rules leads to respectively PTIME, NPTIME and
PSPACE. Our thesis is that the separation of the classes is actually a witness
of the intentional properties of the initial classes of programs
- …