793 research outputs found
Distributed Edge Connectivity in Sublinear Time
We present the first sublinear-time algorithm for a distributed
message-passing network sto compute its edge connectivity exactly in
the CONGEST model, as long as there are no parallel edges. Our algorithm takes
time to compute and a
cut of cardinality with high probability, where and are the
number of nodes and the diameter of the network, respectively, and
hides polylogarithmic factors. This running time is sublinear in (i.e.
) whenever is. Previous sublinear-time
distributed algorithms can solve this problem either (i) exactly only when
[Thurimella PODC'95; Pritchard, Thurimella, ACM
Trans. Algorithms'11; Nanongkai, Su, DISC'14] or (ii) approximately [Ghaffari,
Kuhn, DISC'13; Nanongkai, Su, DISC'14].
To achieve this we develop and combine several new techniques. First, we
design the first distributed algorithm that can compute a -edge connectivity
certificate for any in time .
Second, we show that by combining the recent distributed expander decomposition
technique of [Chang, Pettie, Zhang, SODA'19] with techniques from the
sequential deterministic edge connectivity algorithm of [Kawarabayashi, Thorup,
STOC'15], we can decompose the network into a sublinear number of clusters with
small average diameter and without any mincut separating a cluster (except the
`trivial' ones). Finally, by extending the tree packing technique from [Karger
STOC'96], we can find the minimum cut in time proportional to the number of
components. As a byproduct of this technique, we obtain an -time
algorithm for computing exact minimum cut for weighted graphs.Comment: Accepted at 51st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2019
Brief Announcement: Faster Asynchronous MST and Low Diameter Tree Construction with Sublinear Communication
Building a spanning tree, minimum spanning tree (MST), and BFS tree in a distributed network are fundamental problems which are still not fully understood in terms of time and communication cost. The first work to succeed in computing a spanning tree with communication sublinear in the number of edges in an asynchronous CONGEST network appeared in DISC 2018. That algorithm which constructs an MST is sequential in the worst case; its running time is proportional to the total number of messages sent. Our paper matches its message complexity but brings the running time down to linear in n. Our techniques can also be used to provide an asynchronous algorithm with sublinear communication to construct a tree in which the distance from a source to each node is within an additive term of sqrt{n} of its actual distance
Estimating the weight of metric minimum spanning trees in sublinear time
In this paper we present a sublinear-time -approximation randomized algorithm to estimate the weight of the minimum spanning tree of an -point metric space. The running time of the algorithm is . Since the full description of an -point metric space is of size , the complexity of our algorithm is sublinear with respect to the input size. Our algorithm is almost optimal as it is not possible to approximate in time the weight of the minimum spanning tree to within any factor. We also show that no deterministic algorithm can achieve a -approximation in time. Furthermore, it has been previously shown that no algorithm exists that returns a spanning tree whose weight is within a constant times the optimum
Almost-Tight Distributed Minimum Cut Algorithms
We study the problem of computing the minimum cut in a weighted distributed
message-passing networks (the CONGEST model). Let be the minimum cut,
be the number of nodes in the network, and be the network diameter. Our
algorithm can compute exactly in time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that
explicitly studies computing the exact minimum cut in the distributed setting.
Previously, non-trivial sublinear time algorithms for this problem are known
only for unweighted graphs when due to Pritchard and
Thurimella's -time and -time algorithms for
computing -edge-connected and -edge-connected components.
By using the edge sampling technique of Karger's, we can convert this
algorithm into a -approximation -time algorithm for any . This improves
over the previous -approximation -time algorithm and
-approximation -time algorithm of Ghaffari and Kuhn. Due to the lower
bound of by Das Sarma et al. which holds for any
approximation algorithm, this running time is tight up to a factor.
To get the stated running time, we developed an approximation algorithm which
combines the ideas of Thorup's algorithm and Matula's contraction algorithm. It
saves an factor as compared to applying Thorup's tree
packing theorem directly. Then, we combine Kutten and Peleg's tree partitioning
algorithm and Karger's dynamic programming to achieve an efficient distributed
algorithm that finds the minimum cut when we are given a spanning tree that
crosses the minimum cut exactly once
A Simple Deterministic Distributed MST Algorithm, with Near-Optimal Time and Message Complexities
Distributed minimum spanning tree (MST) problem is one of the most central
and fundamental problems in distributed graph algorithms. Garay et al.
\cite{GKP98,KP98} devised an algorithm with running time , where is the hop-diameter of the input -vertex -edge
graph, and with message complexity . Peleg and Rubinovich
\cite{PR99} showed that the running time of the algorithm of \cite{KP98} is
essentially tight, and asked if one can achieve near-optimal running time
**together with near-optimal message complexity**.
In a recent breakthrough, Pandurangan et al. \cite{PRS16} answered this
question in the affirmative, and devised a **randomized** algorithm with time
and message complexity . They asked if
such a simultaneous time- and message-optimality can be achieved by a
**deterministic** algorithm.
In this paper, building upon the work of \cite{PRS16}, we answer this
question in the affirmative, and devise a **deterministic** algorithm that
computes MST in time , using messages. The polylogarithmic factors in the time
and message complexities of our algorithm are significantly smaller than the
respective factors in the result of \cite{PRS16}. Also, our algorithm and its
analysis are very **simple** and self-contained, as opposed to rather
complicated previous sublinear-time algorithms \cite{GKP98,KP98,E04b,PRS16}
- …