69 research outputs found

    Relative Lipschitzness in Extragradient Methods and a Direct Recipe for Acceleration

    Get PDF
    We show that standard extragradient methods (i.e. mirror prox [Arkadi Nemirovski, 2004] and dual extrapolation [Yurii Nesterov, 2007]) recover optimal accelerated rates for first-order minimization of smooth convex functions. To obtain this result we provide fine-grained characterization of the convergence rates of extragradient methods for solving monotone variational inequalities in terms of a natural condition we call relative Lipschitzness. We further generalize this framework to handle local and randomized notions of relative Lipschitzness and thereby recover rates for box-constrained ?_? regression based on area convexity [Jonah Sherman, 2017] and complexity bounds achieved by accelerated (randomized) coordinate descent [Zeyuan {Allen Zhu} et al., 2016; Yurii Nesterov and Sebastian U. Stich, 2017] for smooth convex function minimization

    Balancing Act: Constraining Disparate Impact in Sparse Models

    Full text link
    Model pruning is a popular approach to enable the deployment of large deep learning models on edge devices with restricted computational or storage capacities. Although sparse models achieve performance comparable to that of their dense counterparts at the level of the entire dataset, they exhibit high accuracy drops for some data sub-groups. Existing methods to mitigate this disparate impact induced by pruning (i) rely on surrogate metrics that address the problem indirectly and have limited interpretability; or (ii) scale poorly with the number of protected sub-groups in terms of computational cost. We propose a constrained optimization approach that directly addresses the disparate impact of pruning\textit{directly addresses the disparate impact of pruning}: our formulation bounds the accuracy change between the dense and sparse models, for each sub-group. This choice of constraints provides an interpretable success criterion to determine if a pruned model achieves acceptable disparity levels. Experimental results demonstrate that our technique scales reliably to problems involving large models and hundreds of protected sub-groups.Comment: Code available at https://github.com/merajhashemi/Balancing_Ac
    corecore