Predicting Skin Permeability by means of Computational Approaches : Reliability and Caveats in Pharmaceutical Studies

© 2019 American Chemical Society.The skin is the main barrier between the internal body environment and the external one. The characteristics of this barrier and its properties are able to modify and affect drug delivery and chemical toxicity parameters. Therefore, it is not surprising that permeability of many different compounds has been measured through several in vitro and in vivo techniques. Moreover, many different in silico approaches have been used to identify the correlation between the structure of the permeants and their permeability, to reproduce the skin behavior, and to predict the ability of specific chemicals to permeate this barrier. A significant number of issues, like interlaboratory variability, experimental conditions, data set building rationales, and skin site of origin and hydration, still prevent us from obtaining a definitive predictive skin permeability model. This review wants to show the main advances and the principal approaches in computational methods used to predict this property, to enlighten the main issues that have arisen, and to address the challenges to develop in future research.Peer reviewedFinal Accepted Versio

Skin Sensitisation (Q)SARs/Expert Systems: from Past, Present to Future

This review describes the state of the art of available (Q)SARs/expert systems for skin sensitisation and evaluates their utility for potential regulatory use. There is a strong mechanistic understanding with respect to skin sensitisation which has facilitated the development of different models. Most existing models fall into one of two main categories either they are local in nature, usually specific to a chemical class or reaction chemical mechanism or else they are global in form, derived empirically using statistical methods. Some of the published global QSARs available have been recently characterised and evaluated elsewhere in accordance with the OECD principles. An overview of expert systems capable of predicting skin sensitisation is also provided. Recently, a new perspective regarding the development of mechanistic skin sensitisation QSARs so-called Quantitative Mechanistic Modelling (QMM) has been proposed, where reactivity and hydrophobicity, are used as the key parameters in mathematically modelling skin sensitisation. Whilst hydrophobicity can be conveniently modelled using log P, the octanol-water partition coefficient; reactivity is less readily determined from chemical structure. Initiatives are in progress to generate reactivity data for reactions relevant to skin sensitisation but more resources are required to realise a comprehensive set of reactivity data. This is a fundamental and necessary requirement for the future assessment of skin sensitisation.JRC.I.3-Toxicology and chemical substance

Review of Data Sources, QSARs and Integrated Testing Strategies for Skin Sensitisation

This review collects information on sources of skin sensitisation data and computational tools for the estimation of skin sensitisation potential, such as expert systems and (quantitative) structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. The review also captures current thinking of what constitutes an integrated testing strategy (ITS) for this endpoint. The emphasis of the review is on the usefulness of the models for the regulatory assessment of chemicals, particularly for the purposes of the new European legislation for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of CHemicals (REACH), which entered into force on 1 June 2007. Since there are no specific databases for skin sensitisation currently available, a description of experimental data found in various literature sources is provided. General (global) models, models for specific chemical classes and mechanisms of action and expert systems are summarised. This review was prepared as a contribution to the EU funded Integrated Project, OSIRIS.JRC.I.3-Consumer products safety and qualit

A Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship for acute oral toxicity of pesticides on rats: Validation, Domain of Application and Prediction

International audienceQuantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) models are expected to play an important role in the risk assessment of chemicals on humans and the environment. In this study, we developed a validated QSAR model to predict acute oral toxicity of 329 pesticides to rats because a few QSAR models have been devoted to predict the Lethal Dose 50 (LD50) of pesticides on rats. This QSAR model is based on 17 molecular descriptors, and is robust, externally predictive and characterized by a good applicability domain. The best results were obtained with a 17/9/1 Artificial Neural Network model trained with the Quasi Newton back propagation (BFGS) algorithm. The prediction accuracy for the external validation set was estimated by the Q2ext and the Root Mean Square error (RMS) which are equal to 0.948 and 0.201, respectively. 98.6% of external validation set is correctly predicted and the present model proved to be superior to models previously published. Accordingly, the model developed in this study provides excellent predictions and can be used to predict the acute oral toxicity of pesticides, particularly for those that have not been tested as well as new pesticides

The Use of Computational Methods in the Grouping and Assessment of Chemicals - Preliminary Investigations

This document presents a perspective of how computational approaches could potentially be used in the grouping and assessment of chemicals, and especially in the application of read-across and the development of chemical categories. The perspective is based on experience gained by the authors during 2006 and 2007, when the Joint Research Centre's European Chemicals Bureau was directly involved in the drafting of technical guidance on the applicability of computational methods under REACH. Some of the experience gained and ideas developed resulted from a number of research-based case studies conducted in-house during 2006 and the first half of 2007. The case studies were performed to explore the possible applications of computational methods in the assessment of chemicals and to contribute to the development of technical guidance. Not all of the methods explored and ideas developed are explicitly included in the final guidance documentation for REACH. Many of the methods are novel, and are still being refined and assessed by the scientific community. At present, many of the methods have not been tried and tested in the regulatory context. The authors therefore hope that the perspective and case studies compiled in this document, whilst not intended to serve as guidance, will nevertheless provide an input to further research efforts aimed at developing computational methods, and at exploring their potential applicability in regulatory assessment of chemicals.JRC.I.3-Toxicology and chemical substance

Data exploration and knowledge extraction: their application to the study of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Interest in computer-aided methods for investigating the biological field has increased significantly. One method is Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR), a valuable technique for predicting the effects of a substance from its chemical structure. A challenging application of QSAR is in characterizing the (bio)activity profiles of chemicals. Endocrine disrupters (EDs) are exogenous substances interfering with the function of the endocrine system and represent an interesting field of application for in silico methods. EDs targets include nuclear receptors, particularly effects mediated by the oestrogen receptor (ER). They are also mentioned as substances requiring a more detailed control and specific authorisation within REACH, the new European legislation on chemicals. QSAR represents a challenging method to approach data gap about EDs since REACH substantially boosted interest on computational chemistry to replace experimental testing. This work: aimed to explore the status, availability and reliability of non-testing methods applied to endocrine disruption via oestrogen receptors and eventually to propose new models easily exploitable in regulatory contexts. The work evaluated existing QSAR models present in literature to assess their validity on the basis of the OECD principles for QSAR validation. Different kinds of models have been analysed and they were externally validated with new data found in the literature. Furthermore, new QSAR binary classifiers have been developed using different data mining techniques (e.g.: classification trees, fuzzy logic, neural networks) based on a very large and heterogeneous dataset of chemical compounds. The focus was given to both binding (RBA) and transcriptional activity (RA) better to characterize the effects of EDs. A possible combination of the models was also explored. A very good accuracy was achieved for both RA and RBA (>85%). These models can be a valuable complement to in vivo and in vitro studies in the toxicological characterisation of chemical compounds

Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis

International audienceFor more than a decade, the integration of human and environmental risk assessment (RA) has become an attractive vision. At the same time, existing European regulations of chemical substances such as REACH (EC Regulation No. 1907/2006), the Plant Protection Products Regulation (EC regulation 1107/2009) and Biocide Regulation (EC Regulation 528/2012) continue to ask for sector-specific RAs, each of which have their individual information requirements regarding exposure and hazard data, and also use different methodologies for the ultimate risk quantification. In response to this difference between the vision for integration and the current scientific and regulatory practice, the present paper outlines five medium-term opportunities for integrating human and environmental RA, followed by detailed discussions of the associated major components and their state of the art. Current hazard assessment approaches are analyzed in terms of data availability and quality, and covering non-test tools, the integrated testing strategy (ITS) approach, the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept, methods for assessing uncertainty, and the issue of explicitly treating mixture toxicity. With respect to exposure, opportunities for integrating exposure assessment are discussed, taking into account the uncertainty, standardization and validation of exposure modeling as well as the availability of exposure data. A further focus is on ways to complement RA by a socio-economic assessment (SEA) in order to better inform about risk management options. In this way, the present analysis, developed as part of the EU FP7 project HEROIC, may contribute to paving the way for integrating, where useful and possible, human and environmental RA in a manner suitable for its coupling with SEA

Prediction of physico-chemical properties for REACH based on QSPR models

International audienceQuantitative Structure Property Relationship models have been developed for the prediction of flash points of two families of organic compounds selected in the PREDIMOL French Project: amines and organic peroxides. If the model dedicated to amines respected all OECD validation principles with excellent performances in predictivity, the one dedicated to organic peroxides was not validated on an external validation set, due to the low number of available data, but already presented high performances in fitting and robustness. This work highlighted the need of gathering experimental data, as in progress in the PREDIMOL project, to achieve validated reliable models that could be used in a regulatory framework, like REACH. Such models are expected to be submitted to the European Joint Research Comity (JRC) and to existing tools (like the OECD ECHA QSAR Toolbox) to be available for use by industrials and regulatory instances