Multiversion Concurrency with Bounded Delay and Precise Garbage Collection

In this paper we are interested in bounding the number of instructions taken to process transactions. The main result is a multiversion transactional system that supports constant delay (extra instructions beyond running in isolation) for all read-only transactions, delay equal to the number of processes for writing transactions that are not concurrent with other writers, and lock-freedom for concurrent writers. The system supports precise garbage collection in that versions are identified for collection as soon as the last transaction releases them. As far as we know these are first results that bound delays for multiple readers and even a single writer. The approach is particularly useful in situations where read-transactions dominate write transactions, or where write transactions come in as streams or batches and can be processed by a single writer (possibly in parallel). The approach is based on using functional data structures to support multiple versions, and an efficient solution to the Version Maintenance (VM) problem for acquiring, updating and releasing versions. Our solution to the VM problem is precise, safe and wait-free (PSWF). We experimentally validate our approach by applying it to balanced tree data structures for maintaining ordered maps. We test the transactional system using multiple algorithms for the VM problem, including our PSWF VM algorithm, and implementations with weaker guarantees based on epochs, hazard pointers, and read-copy-update. To evaluate the functional data structure for concurrency and multi-versioning, we implement batched updates for functional tree structures and compare the performance with state-of-the-art concurrent data structures for balanced trees. The experiments indicate our approach works well in practice over a broad set of criteria

Starvation Freedom in Multi-Version Transactional Memory Systems

Software Transactional Memory systems (STMs) have garnered significant interest as an elegant alternative for addressing synchronization and concurrency issues with multi-threaded programming in multi-core systems. In order for STMs to be efficient, they must guarantee some progress properties. This work explores the notion of starvation-freedom in Software Transactional Memory Systems (STMs). An STM system is said to be starvation-free if every thread invoking a transaction gets opportunity to take a step (due to the presence of a fair scheduler) then the transaction will eventually commit. A few starvation-free algorithms have been proposed in the literature in the context of single-version STM Systems. These algorithm work on the basis of priority. But the drawback with this approach is that if a set of high-priority transactions become slow then they can cause several other transactions to abort. Multi-version STMs maintain multiple-versions for each transactional object or t-object. By storing multiple versions, these systems can achieve greater concurrency. In this paper, we propose a multi-version starvation free STM, KSFTM, which as the name suggests achieves starvation freedom while storing K versions of each t-object. Here K is an input parameter fixed by the application programmer depending on the requirement. Our algorithm is dynamic which can support different values of K ranging from 1 to infinity . If K is infinity then there is no limit on the number of versions. But a separate garbage-collection mechanism is required to collect unwanted versions. On the other hand, when K is 1, it becomes same as a single-version STM system. We prove the correctness and starvation-freedom property of the proposed KSFTM algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multi-version STM system that is correct and satisfies starvation-freedom as well

Linked Research on the Decentralised Web

This thesis is about research communication in the context of the Web. I analyse literature which reveals how researchers are making use of Web technologies for knowledge dissemination, as well as how individuals are disempowered by the centralisation of certain systems, such as academic publishing platforms and social media. I share my findings on the feasibility of a decentralised and interoperable information space where researchers can control their identifiers whilst fulfilling the core functions of scientific communication: registration, awareness, certification, and archiving. The contemporary research communication paradigm operates under a diverse set of sociotechnical constraints, which influence how units of research information and personal data are created and exchanged. Economic forces and non-interoperable system designs mean that researcher identifiers and research contributions are largely shaped and controlled by third-party entities; participation requires the use of proprietary systems. From a technical standpoint, this thesis takes a deep look at semantic structure of research artifacts, and how they can be stored, linked and shared in a way that is controlled by individual researchers, or delegated to trusted parties. Further, I find that the ecosystem was lacking a technical Web standard able to fulfill the awareness function of research communication. Thus, I contribute a new communication protocol, Linked Data Notifications (published as a W3C Recommendation) which enables decentralised notifications on the Web, and provide implementations pertinent to the academic publishing use case. So far we have seen decentralised notifications applied in research dissemination or collaboration scenarios, as well as for archival activities and scientific experiments. Another core contribution of this work is a Web standards-based implementation of a clientside tool, dokieli, for decentralised article publishing, annotations and social interactions. dokieli can be used to fulfill the scholarly functions of registration, awareness, certification, and archiving, all in a decentralised manner, returning control of research contributions and discourse to individual researchers. The overarching conclusion of the thesis is that Web technologies can be used to create a fully functioning ecosystem for research communication. Using the framework of Web architecture, and loosely coupling the four functions, an accessible and inclusive ecosystem can be realised whereby users are able to use and switch between interoperable applications without interfering with existing data. Technical solutions alone do not suffice of course, so this thesis also takes into account the need for a change in the traditional mode of thinking amongst scholars, and presents the Linked Research initiative as an ongoing effort toward researcher autonomy in a social system, and universal access to human- and machine-readable information. Outcomes of this outreach work so far include an increase in the number of individuals self-hosting their research artifacts, workshops publishing accessible proceedings on the Web, in-the-wild experiments with open and public peer-review, and semantic graphs of contributions to conference proceedings and journals (the Linked Open Research Cloud). Some of the future challenges include: addressing the social implications of decentralised Web publishing, as well as the design of ethically grounded interoperable mechanisms; cultivating privacy aware information spaces; personal or community-controlled on-demand archiving services; and further design of decentralised applications that are aware of the core functions of scientific communication

The Death of Public Knowledge? How Free Markets Destroy the General Intellect

The Death of Public Knowledge argues for the value and importance of shared, publicly accessible knowledge, and suggests that the erosion of its most visible forms, including public service broadcasting, education and the network of public libraries, will have worrying outcomes for democracy. Written by a mix of activists and academics this collection of short, sharp essays focuses on different aspects of public knowledge, from libraries and education to news media and public policy. Together the contributors record the stresses and strains placed upon public knowledge by funding cuts and austerity, the new digital economy, quantification and target-setting, neoliberal politics and inequality. These pressures, the authors contend, not only hinder democracies, but also undermine markets, economies and social institutions and spaces everywhere. Covering areas of international public concern, these polemical and accessible essays include reflections on the fate of schools and education, the take-over of public institutions by private, vested interests, and the corruption of news and information in the financial sector. The essays include an account of compromised Greek media during recent EU negotiations, the role played by media and political elites in the Irish property bubble, the compromising of government policy by corporate interests in the US and Korea, as well as the squeeze on public service media in the UK, New Zealand and America. Individually and collectively these pieces spell out the importance of maintaining public, shared knowledge in all its forms, and offer a rallying cry, asserting the need for strong public financial and regulatory support. Contributors Toril Aalberg, Ian Anstice, Philip Augar, Rodney Benson, Aeron Davis, Des Freedman, Wayne Hope, Ken Jones, Bong-hyun Lee, Colin Leys, Andrew McGettigan, Michael Moran and Karel Williams, Aristotelis Nikolaidis, Justin Schlosberg, Henry Silke, Roger Smith, Peter Thompson, Janine R. Wedel, Kate Wrigh