44,516 research outputs found
Inferring Algebraic Effects
We present a complete polymorphic effect inference algorithm for an ML-style
language with handlers of not only exceptions, but of any other algebraic
effect such as input & output, mutable references and many others. Our main aim
is to offer the programmer a useful insight into the effectful behaviour of
programs. Handlers help here by cutting down possible effects and the resulting
lengthy output that often plagues precise effect systems. Additionally, we
present a set of methods that further simplify the displayed types, some even
by deliberately hiding inferred information from the programmer
Koka: Programming with Row Polymorphic Effect Types
We propose a programming model where effects are treated in a disciplined
way, and where the potential side-effects of a function are apparent in its
type signature. The type and effect of expressions can also be inferred
automatically, and we describe a polymorphic type inference system based on
Hindley-Milner style inference. A novel feature is that we support polymorphic
effects through row-polymorphism using duplicate labels. Moreover, we show that
our effects are not just syntactic labels but have a deep semantic connection
to the program. For example, if an expression can be typed without an exn
effect, then it will never throw an unhandled exception. Similar to Haskell's
`runST` we show how we can safely encapsulate stateful operations. Through the
state effect, we can also safely combine state with let-polymorphism without
needing either imperative type variables or a syntactic value restriction.
Finally, our system is implemented fully in a new language called Koka and has
been used successfully on various small to medium-sized sample programs ranging
from a Markdown processor to a tier-splitted chat application. You can try out
Koka live at www.rise4fun.com/koka/tutorial.Comment: In Proceedings MSFP 2014, arXiv:1406.153
A formal soundness proof of region-based memory management for object-oriented paradigm.
Region-based memory management has been proposed as a viable alternative to garbage collection for real-time applications and embedded software. In our previous work we have developed a region type inference algorithm that provides an automatic compile-time region-based memory management for object-oriented paradigm. In this work we present a formal soundness proof of the region type system that is the target of our region inference. More precisely, we prove that the object-oriented programs accepted by our region type system achieve region-based memory management in a safe way. That means, the regions follow a stack-of-regions discipline and regions deallocation never create dangling references in the store and on the program stack. Our contribution is to provide a simple syntactic proof that is based on induction and follows the standard steps of a type safety proof. In contrast the previous safety proofs provided for other region type systems employ quite elaborate techniques
Polymonadic Programming
Monads are a popular tool for the working functional programmer to structure
effectful computations. This paper presents polymonads, a generalization of
monads. Polymonads give the familiar monadic bind the more general type forall
a,b. L a -> (a -> M b) -> N b, to compose computations with three different
kinds of effects, rather than just one. Polymonads subsume monads and
parameterized monads, and can express other constructions, including precise
type-and-effect systems and information flow tracking; more generally,
polymonads correspond to Tate's productoid semantic model. We show how to equip
a core language (called lambda-PM) with syntactic support for programming with
polymonads. Type inference and elaboration in lambda-PM allows programmers to
write polymonadic code directly in an ML-like syntax--our algorithms compute
principal types and produce elaborated programs wherein the binds appear
explicitly. Furthermore, we prove that the elaboration is coherent: no matter
which (type-correct) binds are chosen, the elaborated program's semantics will
be the same. Pleasingly, the inferred types are easy to read: the polymonad
laws justify (sometimes dramatic) simplifications, but with no effect on a
type's generality.Comment: In Proceedings MSFP 2014, arXiv:1406.153
- …