752 research outputs found

    A physics-constrained machine learning method for mapping gapless land surface temperature

    Full text link
    More accurate, spatio-temporally, and physically consistent LST estimation has been a main interest in Earth system research. Developing physics-driven mechanism models and data-driven machine learning (ML) models are two major paradigms for gapless LST estimation, which have their respective advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, a physics-constrained ML model, which combines the strengths in the mechanism model and ML model, is proposed to generate gapless LST with physical meanings and high accuracy. The hybrid model employs ML as the primary architecture, under which the input variable physical constraints are incorporated to enhance the interpretability and extrapolation ability of the model. Specifically, the light gradient-boosting machine (LGBM) model, which uses only remote sensing data as input, serves as the pure ML model. Physical constraints (PCs) are coupled by further incorporating key Community Land Model (CLM) forcing data (cause) and CLM simulation data (effect) as inputs into the LGBM model. This integration forms the PC-LGBM model, which incorporates surface energy balance (SEB) constraints underlying the data in CLM-LST modeling within a biophysical framework. Compared with a pure physical method and pure ML methods, the PC-LGBM model improves the prediction accuracy and physical interpretability of LST. It also demonstrates a good extrapolation ability for the responses to extreme weather cases, suggesting that the PC-LGBM model enables not only empirical learning from data but also rationally derived from theory. The proposed method represents an innovative way to map accurate and physically interpretable gapless LST, and could provide insights to accelerate knowledge discovery in land surface processes and data mining in geographical parameter estimation

    Thermal Inertia-Based Method for Estimating Soil Moisture

    Get PDF
    Thermal inertia is a parameter that characterizes a property of soil that is defined as the square root of the product of the volumetric heat capacity and thermal conductivity. Both properties increase as soil moisture increases. Therefore, soil moisture can be inversely determined using thermal inertia if a relationship between the parameters is obtained in advance. In this chapter, methods for estimating surface soil moisture using thermal inertia are comprehensively reviewed, with emphases on the followings: How thermal inertia is retrieved accurately from a surface heat balance model, and how it is accurately converted to surface soil moisture. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of the thermal inertia methods are discussed and compared to microwave-based methods, such as spatial resolution and the sky conditions. Precise and accurate data from earth observing satellites are indispensable for estimating the spatial distribution of thermal inertia at a high resolution. On the other hand, data assimilation methods are rapidly developing, which may be competitive with thermal inertia methods. Finally, applications of thermal inertia methods are described and discussed for future explorations, such as dust emission in relation to soil moisture, and estimating regional water budgets by combining other satellite data

    Estimation of evapotranspiration using satellite TOA radiances

    No full text

    Remote Sensing Monitoring of Land Surface Temperature (LST)

    Get PDF
    This book is a collection of recent developments, methodologies, calibration and validation techniques, and applications of thermal remote sensing data and derived products from UAV-based, aerial, and satellite remote sensing. A set of 15 papers written by a total of 70 authors was selected for this book. The published papers cover a wide range of topics, which can be classified in five groups: algorithms, calibration and validation techniques, improvements in long-term consistency in satellite LST, downscaling of LST, and LST applications and land surface emissivity research

    AN INVESTIGATION OF REMOTELY SENSED URBAN HEAT ISLAND CLIMATOLOGY

    Get PDF
    Satellite remotely sensed temperatures are widely used for urban heat island (UHI) studies. However, the abilities of satellite surface and atmospheric data to assess the climatology of UHI face many unknowns and challenges. This research addresses the problems and potential for satellite remotely sensed UHI climatology by examining three different issues. The first issue is related to the temporal aggregation of land surface temperature (LST) and the potential biases that are induced on the surface UHI (SUHI) intensity. Composite LST data usually are preferred to avoid the missing values due to clouds for long-term UHI monitoring. The impact of temporal aggregation shows that SUHI intensities are more notably enhanced in the daytime than nighttime with an increasing trend for larger composite periods. The cause of the biases is highly related to the amount and distribution of clouds. The second issue is related to model validation and the appropriate use of LST for comparison to modeled radiometric temperatures in the urban environment. Sensor view angle, cloud distribution, and cloud contaminated pixels can confound comparisons between satellite LST and modeled surface radiometric temperature. Three practical sampling methods to minimize the confounding factors are proposed and evaluated for validating different aspects of model performance. The third issue investigated is to assess to what extent remotely sensed atmospheric profiles collected over the urban environment can be used to examine the UHI. The remotely sensed air and dew-point temperatures are compared with the ground observations, showing an ability to capture the temporal and spatial dynamics of atmospheric UHI at a fine scale. Finally, a new metric for quantifying the urban heat island is proposed. The urban heat island curve (UHIC), is developed to represent UHI intensity by integrating the urban surface heterogeneity in a curve. UHIC illustrates the relationship between the air temperature and the urban fractions, and emphasizes the temperature gradients, consequently decreasing the impact of the data biases. This research illustrates the potential for satellite data to monitor and increase our understanding of UHI climatology

    ๊ตฌ๊ธ€ ์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฟ๋ทฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋„์‹œ ํ˜‘๊ณก ๋‚ด ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„ ์ถ”์ •

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์—…์ƒ๋ช…๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ƒํƒœ์กฐ๊ฒฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2021. 2. ์ด๋™๊ทผ.๋„์‹œ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๋ณดํ–‰์ž์˜ ์—๋„ˆ์ง€ ๊ท ํ˜•์„ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ ๋„์‹œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ด ์พŒ์ ์„ฑ์ด ์•…ํ™”๋˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ์—ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์„ ํ–‰์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋‚ด ์—ด ์พŒ์ ์„ฑ์„ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ƒ์ฒด ๊ธฐ์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜์ธ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‚ฐ์ •์‹์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ๋„“์€ ๋ฒ”์œ„์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ทจ๋“์ด ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ ๋‹จ์œ„์—์„œ ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ์–ด๋ ต๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ๊ธ€์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆฟ๋ทฐ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์‹œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ํ˜‘๊ณก๋‚ด ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ , ๋„์‹œ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ๋„์‹œ์—ด์„ฌ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋งŽ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์˜จ๋„์™€ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ„ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ํŒจํ„ด ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์šฐ์„  ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„ ์ถ”์ •์‹์— ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ฒœ๊ณต๋ฅ ์€ ํŒŒ๋…ธ๋ผ๋งˆ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์‹œ ์š”์ธ๋ณ„(๊ฑด๋ฌผ, ๋‚˜๋ฌด, ํ•˜๋Š˜ ๋“ฑ)๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๊ณ , ์–ด์•ˆ๋ Œ์ฆˆ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ™˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์–ด์•ˆ๋ Œ์ฆˆ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ํƒœ์–‘๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„๋ณ„ ๊ทธ๋ฆผ์ž์˜ ์œ ๋ฌด๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ›„์š”์ธ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ์œ„์น˜ ๋“ฑ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฅํŒŒ, ๋‹จํŒŒ ๋ณต์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์‚ฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„ ์ถ”์ • ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธก๊ฐ„ ๋น„๊ต(7 ๊ณณ) ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋‹จํŒŒ, ์žฅํŒŒ ๊ฐ’์˜ R^2๊ฐ’์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.97, 0.77๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋†’์€ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋„์‹œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ํ™œ์šฉ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋„์‹œ๊ทœ๋ชจ์—์„œ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฉด์˜จ๋„, ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ํŒจํ„ด ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋น„๊ตํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฒœ๊ณต๋ฅ , ๋นŒ๋”ฉ ๋ทฐํŒฉํ„ฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.6~1.0, 0.35-0.5์ธ ์˜คํ”ˆ์ŠคํŽ˜์ด์Šค ํ˜น์€ ์ €์ธต ๋ฐ€์ง‘์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„(>59.4ยฐC)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋†’์€ ๋นŒ๋”ฉ์ด ๋ฐ€์ง‘๋œ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ(๋นŒ๋”ฉ ๋ทฐํŒฉํ„ฐ :0.4-0.6, ๋‚˜๋ฌด ๋ทฐํŒฉํ„ฐ 0.6-0.9) ๋‚ฎ์€ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„(<47.6ยฐC)๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์ด ๋™-์„œ ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ฒœ๊ณต๋ฅ ์ด 0.3-0.55 ์ผ์ง€๋ผ๋„ ๋†’์€ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„์™€ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์˜จ๋„๊ฐ„ ๋น„๊ต๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’์€ ์˜จ๋„ ๊ฐ’์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ด ์œ ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ์ €์ธต ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์ง€์—ญ ํ˜น์€ ์ดˆ์ง€ ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ์ƒ๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋„์‹œ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์—์„œ ๋†’์€ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๋กœ ํ‰๊ท ๋ณต์‚ฌ์˜จ๋„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฉด ์˜จ๋„์™€ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ํŒจํ„ด๋ณ„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์‹ค์ œ ๋ณดํ–‰์ž๊ฐ€ ์ฒด๊ฐํ•˜๋Š” ์—ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๋„์‹œ ์—ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ ์ง€์†๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ๋„์‹œ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋ฐ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ ๊ณ„ํš ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ™œ์šฉ ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํŠนํžˆ ๊ณต๊ฐ„๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ทจ๋“์ด ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ณณ์—์„œ์˜ ๋†’์€ ํ™œ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.This paper presents a method for estimating Mean Radiant Temperature (MRT) of street canyons using Google Street View (GSV) images and investigates its spatial patterns in street-level on large scale. We used image segmentation using deep learning, project panorama to fisheye image and sun path algorithms to estimate MRT using GSV. Verification of proposed method can be explained by total of 7 field measurements in clear-sky of street-level, since the estimated shortwave and longwave radiation of value is 0.97, 0.77 respectively. The method proposed in this study is suitable for actual complex urban environment consisting of buildings, tree and streets. Additionally, we compared calculated MRT and LST (Land Surface Temperature) from Landsat 8 in a city scale. As a result of investigating spatial patterns of MRT in Seoul, We found that Higher MRT of street canyons ( >59.4โ„ƒ) is mainly distributed in open space areas and compact low-rise density building where SVF (Sky View Factor) is 0.6โ€“1.0 and BVF(Building View Factor) is 0.35โ€“0.5, or West-East orientation street canyons with SVF(0.3โ€“0.55). On the other hand, high density building (BVF is 0.4โ€“0.6) or high density tree areas (TVF (Tree View Factor) is 0.6โ€“0.99) showed Low MRT ( < 47.6). The mapped MRT results had similar spatial distribution with LST, but the MRT(?) lower (?) than LST in low tree density or low-rise high-density building areas. And it will help decision makers how to improve thermal comfort at the street-level.Chapter 1. Introduction ๏ผ‘ 1.1. Study Background ๏ผ‘ 1.2. Literature review ๏ผ” 1.2.1 Mean radiant temperature formula ๏ผ” 1.2.2 Surface temperature simulation model ๏ผ• Chapter 2. Study area and data ๏ผ‘๏ผ 2.1. Study area ๏ผ‘๏ผ 2.2. Data collection ๏ผ‘๏ผ‘ Chapter 3. Method ๏ผ‘๏ผ“ 3.1. Research flow ๏ผ‘๏ผ“ 3.2. MRT simulation ๏ผ‘๏ผ” 3.2.1. Schematic flow for MRT simulation ๏ผ‘๏ผ” 3.2.2. Urban canyon geometry calculation using GSV images (Phase I: built geometry data) ๏ผ‘๏ผ– 3.2.3. Street canyon solar radiation calculation (Phase II:radiation transfer calculation.) ๏ผ‘๏ผ— 3.2.3.1 Calculation of street-level shortwave radiation ๏ผ‘๏ผ— 3.2.3.2 Calculation of street-level long-wave radiation ๏ผ‘๏ผ™ 3.2.4. Phase III mean radiation temperature calculation ๏ผ’๏ผ‘ Chapter 4. Result and Discussion ๏ผ’๏ผ’ 4.1. verification of solar radiation estimated in street-level ๏ผ’๏ผ’ 4.2. Validation of Long-wave radiation ๏ผ’๏ผ” 4.3. Comparison between LST and MRT estimated using GSV ๏ผ’๏ผ– 4.4. Comparison of GSV_MRT with other models ๏ผ’๏ผ™ 4.5. limitations and future development ๏ผ“๏ผ’ Chapter 5. Conclusion ๏ผ“๏ผ” Bibliography ๏ผ“๏ผ– Abstract in Korean ๏ผ”๏ผ“ Appendix ๏ผ”๏ผ•Maste

    A global long-term (1981โ€“2000) land surface temperature product for NOAA AVHRR

    Get PDF
    Land surface temperature (LST) plays an important role in the research of climate change and various land surface processes. Before 2000, global LST products with relatively high temporal and spatial resolutions are scarce, despite a variety of operational satellite LST products. In this study, a global 0.05โˆ˜ร—0.05โˆ˜ historical LST product is generated from NOAA advanced very-high-resolution radiometer (AVHRR) data (1981โ€“2000), which includes three data layers: (1) instantaneous LST, a product generated by integrating several split-window algorithms with a random forest (RF-SWA); (2) orbital-drift-corrected (ODC) LST, a drift-corrected version of RF-SWA LST; and (3) monthly averages of ODC LST. For an assumed maximum uncertainty in emissivity and column water vapor content of 0.04 and 1.0โ€‰gโ€‰cmโˆ’2, respectively, evaluated against the simulation dataset, the RF-SWA method has a mean bias error (MBE) of less than 0.10โ€‰K and a standard deviation (SD) of 1.10โ€‰K. To compensate for the influence of orbital drift on LST, the retrieved RF-SWA LST was normalized with an improved ODC method. The RF-SWA LST were validated with in situ LST from Surface Radiation Budget (SURFRAD) sites and water temperatures obtained from the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC). Against the in situ LST, the RF-SWA LST has a MBE of 0.03โ€‰K with a range of โˆ’1.59โ€“2.71โ€‰K, and SD is 1.18โ€‰K with a range of 0.84โ€“2.76โ€‰K. Since water temperature only changes slowly, the validation of ODC LST was limited to SURFRAD sites, for which the MBE is 0.54โ€‰K with a range of โˆ’1.05 to 3.01โ€‰K and SD is 3.57โ€‰K with a range of 2.34 to 3.69โ€‰K, indicating good product accuracy. As global historical datasets, the new AVHRR LST products are useful for filling the gaps in long-term LST data. Furthermore, the new LST products can be used as input to related land surface models and environmental applications. Furthermore, in support of the scientific research community, the datasets are freely available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3934354 for RF-SWA LST (Ma et al., 2020a), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3936627 for ODC LST (Ma et al., 2020c), and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3936641 for monthly averaged LST (Ma et al., 2020b)

    The value of satellite remote sensing soil moisture data and the DISPATCH algorithm in irrigation fields

    Get PDF
    Soil moisture measurements are needed in a large number of applications such as hydro-climate approaches, watershed water balance management and irrigation scheduling. Nowadays, different kinds of methodologies exist for measuring soil moisture. Direct methods based on gravimetric sampling or time domain reflectometry (TDR) techniques measure soil moisture in a small volume of soil at few particular locations. This typically gives a poor description of the spatial distribution of soil moisture in relatively large agriculture fields. Remote sensing of soil moisture provides widespread coverage and can overcome this problem but suffers from other problems stemming from its low spatial resolution. In this context, the DISaggregation based on Physical And Theoretical scale CHange (DISPATCH) algorithm has been proposed in the literature to downscale soil moisture satellite data from 40 to 1ยฟkm resolution by combining the low-resolution Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite soil moisture data with the high-resolution Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and land surface temperature (LST) datasets obtained from a Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor. In this work, DISPATCH estimations are compared with soil moisture sensors and gravimetric measurements to validate the DISPATCH algorithm in an agricultural field during two different hydrologic scenarios: wet conditions driven by rainfall events and wet conditions driven by local sprinkler irrigation. Results show that the DISPATCH algorithm provides appropriate soil moisture estimates during general rainfall events but not when sprinkler irrigation generates occasional heterogeneity. In order to explain these differences, we have examined the spatial variability scales of NDVI and LST data, which are the input variables involved in the downscaling process. Sample variograms show that the spatial scales associated with the NDVI and LST properties are too large to represent the variations of the average soil moisture at the site, and this could be a reason why the DISPATCH algorithm does not work properly in this field site.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

    The effect of land use on land surface temperature in the Netherlands

    Get PDF
    The Netherlands has experienced a rapid rate of land use change from 2000 to 2008. Land use change is especially urban expansion and open agriculture reduction which is due to enhanced economic growth. This thesis reports an investigation into the application of remote sensing, geographic information systems (GIS) and statistical methods to provide quantitative information on the effect of land use on land surface temperature. Remote sensing techniques were used to retrieve the land surface temperature by using MODIS Terra (MOD11A2) product. As land use change alters the thermal environment, LST could be a proper change indicator to show thermal changes in relation to land use changes. GIS was further applied to extract the coverage ratio of each land use in the context of LST pixels. Using correlation and linear regression this interrelationship was then quantified. Night land surface temperature correlates positively with the coverage percentage of open agriculture, forest and greenhouse farming. This association is negative for buildup are and inland water and offshore land use types. The results also show that inland water and offshore area has the highest night LST and the lowest day LST. Build up is the warmest land use during the days and the second warm land use during the night time. The result of this research will be helpful for urban planners and environmental scientists
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore