70,743 research outputs found
A Computable Measure of Algorithmic Probability by Finite Approximations with an Application to Integer Sequences
Given the widespread use of lossless compression algorithms to approximate
algorithmic (Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity, and that lossless compression
algorithms fall short at characterizing patterns other than statistical ones
not different to entropy estimations, here we explore an alternative and
complementary approach. We study formal properties of a Levin-inspired measure
calculated from the output distribution of small Turing machines. We
introduce and justify finite approximations that have been used in some
applications as an alternative to lossless compression algorithms for
approximating algorithmic (Kolmogorov-Chaitin) complexity. We provide proofs of
the relevant properties of both and and compare them to Levin's
Universal Distribution. We provide error estimations of with respect to
. Finally, we present an application to integer sequences from the Online
Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences which suggests that our AP-based measures may
characterize non-statistical patterns, and we report interesting correlations
with textual, function and program description lengths of the said sequences.Comment: As accepted by the journal Complexity (Wiley/Hindawi
On Resource-bounded versions of the van Lambalgen theorem
The van Lambalgen theorem is a surprising result in algorithmic information
theory concerning the symmetry of relative randomness. It establishes that for
any pair of infinite sequences and , is Martin-L\"of random and
is Martin-L\"of random relative to if and only if the interleaved sequence
is Martin-L\"of random. This implies that is relative random
to if and only if is random relative to \cite{vanLambalgen},
\cite{Nies09}, \cite{HirschfeldtBook}. This paper studies the validity of this
phenomenon for different notions of time-bounded relative randomness.
We prove the classical van Lambalgen theorem using martingales and Kolmogorov
compressibility. We establish the failure of relative randomness in these
settings, for both time-bounded martingales and time-bounded Kolmogorov
complexity. We adapt our classical proofs when applicable to the time-bounded
setting, and construct counterexamples when they fail. The mode of failure of
the theorem may depend on the notion of time-bounded randomness
- …