A Computer Aided Detection system for mammographic images implemented on a GRID infrastructure

The use of an automatic system for the analysis of mammographic images has proven to be very useful to radiologists in the investigation of breast cancer, especially in the framework of mammographic-screening programs. A breast neoplasia is often marked by the presence of microcalcification clusters and massive lesions in the mammogram: hence the need for tools able to recognize such lesions at an early stage. In the framework of the GPCALMA (GRID Platform for Computer Assisted Library for MAmmography) project, the co-working of italian physicists and radiologists built a large distributed database of digitized mammographic images (about 5500 images corresponding to 1650 patients) and developed a CAD (Computer Aided Detection) system, able to make an automatic search of massive lesions and microcalcification clusters. The CAD is implemented in the GPCALMA integrated station, which can be used also for digitization, as archive and to perform statistical analyses. Some GPCALMA integrated stations have already been implemented and are currently on clinical trial in some italian hospitals. The emerging GRID technology can been used to connect the GPCALMA integrated stations operating in different medical centers. The GRID approach will support an effective tele- and co-working between radiologists, cancer specialists and epidemiology experts by allowing remote image analysis and interactive online diagnosis.Comment: 5 pages, 5 figures, to appear in the Proceedings of the 13th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference 2003, Montreal, Canada, May 18-23 200

Determinants and influence of mammographic features on breast cancer risk

Mammographic density and mammographic microcalcifications are the key imaging features in mammography examination. Mammographic density is known as a strong risk factor for breast cancer and is the radiographic appearance of epithelial and fibrous tissue which appears white on a mammogram. While, the dark part of a mammogram represents the fatty tissue. Mammographic microcalcifications appear as small deposits of calcium and they are one of the earliest sign of breast cancer. Malignant microcalcifications are seen in both in situ and invasive lesions. In this thesis we used the data from the prospective KARMA cohort to study the association between established breast cancer risk factors with mammographic density change over time (Study I), to examine the association between annual mammographic density change and risk of breast cancer (Study II), to investigate the association between established risk factors for breast cancer and microcalcification clusters and their asymmetry (Study III), and finally to elucidate the association between microcalcification clusters, their asymmetry, and risk of overall and subtype specific breast cancer (Study IV). The lifestyle and reproductive factors were assessed using web-based questionnaires. Average mammographic density and total microcalcification clusters were measured using a Computer Aided Detection system (CAD) and the STRATUS method, respectively. In Study I, the average yearly dense area change was -1.0 cm . Body mass index (BMI) and physical activity were statistically associated with density change. Beside age, lean and physically active women had the largest decrease in mammographic density per year. In Study II, overall, 563 women were diagnosed with breast cancer and annual mammographic density change did not seem to influence the risk of breast cancer. Furthermore, density change does not seem to modify the association between baseline density and risk of breast cancer. In Study III, age, mammographic density, genetic factors related to breast cancer, having more children, longer duration of breast-feeding were significantly associated with increased risk of presence of microcalcification clusters. In Study IV, 676 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. Further, women with 33 microcalcification clusters had 2 times higher risk of breast cancer compared to women with no clusters. Microcalcification clusters were associated with both in situ and invasive breast cancer. Finally, during postmenopausal period, microcalcification clusters influence risk of breast cancer to the similar extend as baseline mammographic density. In conclusion, we have identified novel determinants of mammographic density changes and potential predictors of suspicious mammographic microcalcification clusters. Further, our results suggested that annual mammographic density change does not influence breast cancer risk, while presence of suspicious microcalcification clusters was strongly associated with breast cancer risk

Convolutional Neural Networks for the segmentation of microcalcification in Mammography Imaging

Cluster of microcalcifications can be an early sign of breast cancer. In this paper we propose a novel approach based on convolutional neural networks for the detection and segmentation of microcalcification clusters. In this work we used 283 mammograms to train and validate our model, obtaining an accuracy of 98.22% in the detection of preliminary suspect regions and of 97.47% in the segmentation task. Our results show how deep learning could be an effective tool to effectively support radiologists during mammograms examination.Comment: 13 pages, 7 figure

Exploration of the Relationship Between the Fractal Dimension of Microcalcification Clusters and the Hurst Exponent of Background Tissue Disruption in Mammograms

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent cancers among women worldwide and holds the second place in cancer-related death. Mammography is the most commonly used screening technique, however, the dense nature of some breasts makes the analysis of mammograms challenging for radiologists. The 2D Wavelet Transform Modulus Maxima (WTMM) is one mathematical approach that is used to for the analysis of mammograms. In 2014, a team from the CompuMAINE Lab characterized differences between benign microcalcification clusters (MC) from malignant MC by calculating their fractal dimension, D, with the aid of the 2D WTMM method. In a different implementation of the 2D WTMM method, this same team did research in 2017 where they quantified tissue disruption in breast tissue microenvironment using the Hurst exponent, H. The goal of this study was to further explore the potential relationship between the fractality of MC clusters and tissue disruption in the microenvironment surrounding these clusters. Statistical relationships are explored between the fractal dimension, D, of MC clusters and the Hurst exponent, H measuring tissue disruption. A “2D fractal dimension vs. Hurst exponent plot” was graphed to show this relationship used to distinguish between benign and malignant cases. In the graph, a quadrilateral region extending horizontally from Hurst value of (0.2,0.8) centered at 0.5 and stretching vertically from fractal dimension value of (1.2,1.8) centered 1.5 was identified. Analysis of this region has showed that the 60% of the malignant cases and 21% benign cases are found inside the quadrilateral for CC view and 68% of the malignant cases and 12% of benign cases are found inside the region for MLO view. As a conclusion, based on the outcomes of this study one can hypothesize that with further analyses, loss of tissue homeostasis describing the state of the microenvironment of a breast tissue and the fractal nature of MC clusters have a quantifiable relationship to distinguish benign cases from malignant cases in mammogram analysis

COMPUTER AIDED SYSTEM FOR BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING CURVELET TRANSFORM

Breast cancer is a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Early detection is the key for improving breast cancer prognosis. Digital mammography remains one of the most suitable tools for early detection of breast cancer. Hence, there are strong needs for the development of computer aided diagnosis (CAD) systems which have the capability to help radiologists in decision making. The main goal is to increase the diagnostic accuracy rate. In this thesis we developed a computer aided system for the diagnosis and detection of breast cancer using curvelet transform. Curvelet is a multiscale transform which possess directionality and anisotropy, and it breaks some inherent limitations of wavelet in representing edges in images. We started this study by developing a diagnosis system. Five feature extraction methods were developed with curvelet and wavelet coefficients to differentiate between different breast cancer classes. The results with curvelet and wavelet were compared. The experimental results show a high performance of the proposed methods and classification accuracy rate achieved 97.30%. The thesis then provides an automatic system for breast cancer detection. An automatic thresholding algorithm was used to separate the area composed of the breast and the pectoral muscle from the background of the image. Subsequently, a region growing algorithm was used to locate the pectoral muscle and suppress it from the breast. Then, the work concentrates on the segmentation of region of interest (ROI). Two methods are suggested to accomplish the segmentation stage: an adaptive thresholding method and a pattern matching method. Once the ROI has been identified, an automatic cropping is performed to extract it from the original mammogram. Subsequently, the suggested feature extraction methods were applied to the segmented ROIs. Finally, the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were used to determine whether the region is abnormal or normal. At this level, the study focuses on two abnormality types (mammographic masses and architectural distortion). Experimental results show that the introduced methods have very high detection accuracies. The effectiveness of the proposed methods has been tested with Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) dataset. Throughout the thesis all proposed methods and algorithms have been applied with both curvelet and wavelet for comparison and statistical tests were also performed. The overall results show that curvelet transform performs better than wavelet and the difference is statistically significant