2,118 research outputs found
A survey of cost-sensitive decision tree induction algorithms
The past decade has seen a significant interest on the problem of inducing decision trees that take account of costs of misclassification and costs of acquiring the features used for decision making. This survey identifies over 50 algorithms including approaches that are direct adaptations of accuracy based methods, use genetic algorithms, use anytime methods and utilize boosting and bagging. The survey brings together these different studies and novel approaches to cost-sensitive decision tree learning, provides a useful taxonomy, a historical timeline of how the field has developed and should provide a useful reference point for future research in this field
An update on statistical boosting in biomedicine
Statistical boosting algorithms have triggered a lot of research during the
last decade. They combine a powerful machine-learning approach with classical
statistical modelling, offering various practical advantages like automated
variable selection and implicit regularization of effect estimates. They are
extremely flexible, as the underlying base-learners (regression functions
defining the type of effect for the explanatory variables) can be combined with
any kind of loss function (target function to be optimized, defining the type
of regression setting). In this review article, we highlight the most recent
methodological developments on statistical boosting regarding variable
selection, functional regression and advanced time-to-event modelling.
Additionally, we provide a short overview on relevant applications of
statistical boosting in biomedicine
Ensemble deep learning: A review
Ensemble learning combines several individual models to obtain better
generalization performance. Currently, deep learning models with multilayer
processing architecture is showing better performance as compared to the
shallow or traditional classification models. Deep ensemble learning models
combine the advantages of both the deep learning models as well as the ensemble
learning such that the final model has better generalization performance. This
paper reviews the state-of-art deep ensemble models and hence serves as an
extensive summary for the researchers. The ensemble models are broadly
categorised into ensemble models like bagging, boosting and stacking, negative
correlation based deep ensemble models, explicit/implicit ensembles,
homogeneous /heterogeneous ensemble, decision fusion strategies, unsupervised,
semi-supervised, reinforcement learning and online/incremental, multilabel
based deep ensemble models. Application of deep ensemble models in different
domains is also briefly discussed. Finally, we conclude this paper with some
future recommendations and research directions
Separation of pulsar signals from noise with supervised machine learning algorithms
We evaluate the performance of four different machine learning (ML)
algorithms: an Artificial Neural Network Multi-Layer Perceptron (ANN MLP ),
Adaboost, Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), XGBoost, for the separation of
pulsars from radio frequency interference (RFI) and other sources of noise,
using a dataset obtained from the post-processing of a pulsar search pi peline.
This dataset was previously used for cross-validation of the SPINN-based
machine learning engine, used for the reprocessing of HTRU-S survey data
arXiv:1406.3627. We have used Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
(SMOTE) to deal with high class imbalance in the dataset. We report a variety
of quality scores from all four of these algorithms on both the non-SMOTE and
SMOTE datasets. For all the above ML methods, we report high accuracy and
G-mean in both the non-SMOTE and SMOTE cases. We study the feature importances
using Adaboost, GBC, and XGBoost and also from the minimum Redundancy Maximum
Relevance approach to report algorithm-agnostic feature ranking. From these
methods, we find that the signal to noise of the folded profile to be the best
feature. We find that all the ML algorithms report FPRs about an order of
magnitude lower than the corresponding FPRs obtained in arXiv:1406.3627, for
the same recall value.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy and
Computin
- …