GEOBIA, TREE DECISION AND HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION FOR MAPPING GULLY EROSION

The gullies provoke environmental, social and financial damages. The application of corrective and preventive measures needs gullies mapping and monitoring. In this scope, this study proposes a methodology for gullies delimitation using object-oriented image analysis. For such, there were used high spatial resolution imagery and ALS data applied for two study areas, one in Uberlandia-Minas Gerais (Brazil) and another one in Queensland (Australia). The objects were generated by multiresolution segmentation. The most important attributes on the delimitation of the gullies were selected using decision tree induction algorithms, being them: spectral, altimetric and texture. Classifications by decision trees and hierarchical were carried out. The use of decision tree allowed the selection of attributes and the establishment of preliminary decision rules. However, since this procedure did not use fuzzy logic, mixtures between classes could not be evidenced in the rule base. Moreover, the classification was performed by a factor of scale only, which did not allow the identification of all the constituent features of the gully. In hierarchical classification, the procedure is performed on different scales, allowing the use of fuzzy logic to describe different degrees of membership in each class, which makes it a very attractive method for cases such as this study, where there is mixing of classes. The classification obtained with hierarchical classification it was more reliable with the field truth, by allowing the use of different scales, uncertainty insert and integration of knowledge, compared to the automatic classification by decision tree

Multi-test Decision Tree and its Application to Microarray Data Classification

Objective: The desirable property of tools used to investigate biological data is easy to understand models and predictive decisions. Decision trees are particularly promising in this regard due to their comprehensible nature that resembles the hierarchical process of human decision making. However, existing algorithms for learning decision trees have tendency to underfit gene expression data. The main aim of this work is to improve the performance and stability of decision trees with only a small increase in their complexity. Methods: We propose a multi-test decision tree (MTDT); our main contribution is the application of several univariate tests in each non-terminal node of the decision tree. We also search for alternative, lower-ranked features in order to obtain more stable and reliable predictions. Results: Experimental validation was performed on several real-life gene expression datasets. Comparison results with eight classifiers show that MTDT has a statistically significantly higher accuracy than popular decision tree classifiers, and it was highly competitive with ensemble learning algorithms. The proposed solution managed to outperform its baseline algorithm on $14$ datasets by an average $6$ percent. A study performed on one of the datasets showed that the discovered genes used in the MTDT classification model are supported by biological evidence in the literature. Conclusion: This paper introduces a new type of decision tree which is more suitable for solving biological problems. MTDTs are relatively easy to analyze and much more powerful in modeling high dimensional microarray data than their popular counterparts

Exploiting the Hierarchical Structure of Rule-Based Specifications for Decision Planning

Rule-based specifications have been very successful as a declarative approach in many domains, due to the handy yet solid foundations offered by rule-based machineries like term and graph rewriting. Realistic problems, however, call for suitable techniques to guarantee scalability. For instance, many domains exhibit a hierarchical structure that can be exploited conveniently. This is particularly evident for composition associations of models. We propose an explicit representation of such structured models and a methodology that exploits it for the description and analysis of model- and rule-based systems. The approach is presented in the framework of rewriting logic and its efficient implementation in the rewrite engine Maude and is illustrated with a case study.

CBR and MBR techniques: review for an application in the emergencies domain

The purpose of this document is to provide an in-depth analysis of current reasoning engine practice and the integration strategies of Case Based Reasoning and Model Based Reasoning that will be used in the design and development of the RIMSAT system. RIMSAT (Remote Intelligent Management Support and Training) is a European Commission funded project designed to: a.. Provide an innovative, 'intelligent', knowledge based solution aimed at improving the quality of critical decisions b.. Enhance the competencies and responsiveness of individuals and organisations involved in highly complex, safety critical incidents - irrespective of their location. In other words, RIMSAT aims to design and implement a decision support system that using Case Base Reasoning as well as Model Base Reasoning technology is applied in the management of emergency situations. This document is part of a deliverable for RIMSAT project, and although it has been done in close contact with the requirements of the project, it provides an overview wide enough for providing a state of the art in integration strategies between CBR and MBR technologies.Postprint (published version

Classification

In Classification learning, an algorithm is presented with a set of classified examples or ‘‘instances’’ from which it is expected to infer a way of classifying unseen instances into one of several ‘‘classes’’. Instances have a set of features or ‘‘attributes’’ whose values define that particular instance. Numeric prediction, or ‘‘regression,’’ is a variant of classification learning in which the class attribute is numeric rather than categorical. Classification learning is sometimes called supervised because the method operates under supervision by being provided with the actual outcome for each of the training instances. This contrasts with Data clustering (see entry Data Clustering), where the classes are not given, and with Association learning (see entry Association Learning), which seeks any association – not just one that predicts the class