D4.1. Technologies and tools for corpus creation, normalization and annotation

The objectives of the Corpus Acquisition and Annotation (CAA) subsystem are the acquisition and processing of monolingual and bilingual language resources (LRs) required in the PANACEA context. Therefore, the CAA subsystem includes: i) a Corpus Acquisition Component (CAC) for extracting monolingual and bilingual data from the web, ii) a component for cleanup and normalization (CNC) of these data and iii) a text processing component (TPC) which consists of NLP tools including modules for sentence splitting, POS tagging, lemmatization, parsing and named entity recognition

An Efficient Probabilistic Context-Free Parsing Algorithm that Computes Prefix Probabilities

We describe an extension of Earley's parser for stochastic context-free grammars that computes the following quantities given a stochastic context-free grammar and an input string: a) probabilities of successive prefixes being generated by the grammar; b) probabilities of substrings being generated by the nonterminals, including the entire string being generated by the grammar; c) most likely (Viterbi) parse of the string; d) posterior expected number of applications of each grammar production, as required for reestimating rule probabilities. (a) and (b) are computed incrementally in a single left-to-right pass over the input. Our algorithm compares favorably to standard bottom-up parsing methods for SCFGs in that it works efficiently on sparse grammars by making use of Earley's top-down control structure. It can process any context-free rule format without conversion to some normal form, and combines computations for (a) through (d) in a single algorithm. Finally, the algorithm has simple extensions for processing partially bracketed inputs, and for finding partial parses and their likelihoods on ungrammatical inputs.Comment: 45 pages. Slightly shortened version to appear in Computational Linguistics 2

Proceedings

Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories. Editors: Markus Dickinson, Kaili Müürisep and Marco Passarotti. NEALT Proceedings Series, Vol. 9 (2010), 268 pages. © 2010 The editors and contributors. Published by Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT) http://omilia.uio.no/nealt . Electronically published at Tartu University Library (Estonia) http://hdl.handle.net/10062/15891

D6.1: Technologies and Tools for Lexical Acquisition

This report describes the technologies and tools to be used for Lexical Acquisition in PANACEA. It includes descriptions of existing technologies and tools which can be built on and improved within PANACEA, as well as of new technologies and tools to be developed and integrated in PANACEA platform. The report also specifies the Lexical Resources to be produced. Four main areas of lexical acquisition are included: Subcategorization frames (SCFs), Selectional Preferences (SPs), Lexical-semantic Classes (LCs), for both nouns and verbs, and Multi-Word Expressions (MWEs)

On Pseudorelatives and Human Sentence Parsing

The debate over whether universal parsing mechanisms are necessary to explain sentence comprehension is clearly a fundamental one for cognitive science. This dissertation focuses on the relation between syntactic ambiguity and principles of economy in the parsing of ambiguous Pseudo Relative (PR)/ Relative Clause (RC) strings. While the principles of locality would predict local attachment in (exclusive) RC contexts, PR-first Hypothesis (Grillo & Costa, 2014) predicts high attachment (corresponding to a PR parse) in ambiguous PR/RC contexts. We test the offline and online effects of PR availability in Spanish using a variety of research methods (eye-tracking while reading, sentence completion task, forced-choice questionnaire, acceptability judgement), while also looking at the interaction with other factors such as aspectual properties of the embedded predicate. The results reported here are robust across studies and show an influence of PRs on the parsing of RCs: when PRs are not a confound, and relevant factors are controlled (e.g. length of the clauses), locality principles apply to RC attachment; when PRs are available, attachment preferences shift toward the non-local option. These results support the universality of parsing principles and suggest that crosslinguistic variation in RC attachment is epiphenomenal and largely attributable to the asymmetric availability of PRs across languages. This dissertation also provides a detailed description on PR-licensing contexts that might be useful for future research on RC attachment preferences to avoid the PR confound.O debate sobre se os mecanismos de análise universal são necessários para explicar a compreensão de frases é claramente fundamental para a Ciência Cognitiva. Esta dissertação centra-se na relação entre ambiguidade sintática e princípios de economia na análise de estruturaspseudorelativas (PR)/ orações relativas (OR) ambíguas. Enquanto os princípios de localidade prediriam a ligação local em contextos (exclusivos) das OR, a PR-first Hypothesis (Grillo & Costa, 2014) prevê uma alta ligação (correspondente a uma análise da PR) em contextos PR/OR ambíguos. Nesta tese testamos os efeitos offline e online da disponibilidade das PRs em Espanhol, utilizando uma variedade de métodos de investigação (técnica de registo dos comportamentos oculares (eye-tracking) durante a leitura, tarefa de preenchimento de frases, questionários, julgamento da aceitabilidade), ao mesmo tempo que também analisamos a interação com as propriedades aspetuais do predicado encaixado. Os resultados obtidos nesta dissertação mostram uma influência das PRs na análise das ORs: quando as PRs estão disponíveis e os fatores relevantes são controlados (por exemplo, o comprimento das orações), os princípios da localidade aplicam-se à adjunção das ORs; quando as PRs estão disponíveis, as preferências de adjunção mudam para a opção não-local. Estes resultados apoiam a universalidade dos princípios de análise e sugerem que a variação linguística na adjunção da OR é epifenomenal e amplamente atribuível à disponibilidade assimétrica das PRs entre línguas. Esta dissertação também fornece uma descrição detalhada dos contextos de licenciamento da PR, que podem ser úteis para evitar a ambiguidade PR/OR em futuras pesquisas sobre as preferências da ligação da OR

General methods for fine-grained morphological and syntactic disambiguation

We present methods for improved handling of morphologically rich languages (MRLS) where we define MRLS as languages that are morphologically more complex than English. Standard algorithms for language modeling, tagging and parsing have problems with the productive nature of such languages. Consider for example the possible forms of a typical English verb like work that generally has four four different forms: work, works, working and worked. Its Spanish counterpart trabajar has 6 different forms in present tense: trabajo, trabajas, trabaja, trabajamos, trabajáis and trabajan and more than 50 different forms when including the different tenses, moods (indicative, subjunctive and imperative) and participles. Such a high number of forms leads to sparsity issues: In a recent Wikipedia dump of more than 400 million tokens we find that 20 of these forms occur only twice or less and that 10 forms do not occur at all. This means that even if we only need unlabeled data to estimate a model and even when looking at a relatively common and frequent verb, we do not have enough data to make reasonable estimates for some of its forms. However, if we decompose an unseen form such as trabajaréis `you will work', we find that it is trabajar in future tense and second person plural. This allows us to make the predictions that are needed to decide on the grammaticality (language modeling) or syntax (tagging and parsing) of a sentence. In the first part of this thesis, we develop a morphological language model. A language model estimates the grammaticality and coherence of a sentence. Most language models used today are word-based n-gram models, which means that they estimate the transitional probability of a word following a history, the sequence of the (n - 1) preceding words. The probabilities are estimated from the frequencies of the history and the history followed by the target word in a huge text corpus. If either of the sequences is unseen, the length of the history has to be reduced. This leads to a less accurate estimate as less context is taken into account. Our morphological language model estimates an additional probability from the morphological classes of the words. These classes are built automatically by extracting morphological features from the word forms. To this end, we use unsupervised segmentation algorithms to find the suffixes of word forms. Such an algorithm might for example segment trabajaréis into trabaja and réis and we can then estimate the properties of trabajaréis from other word forms with the same or similar morphological properties. The data-driven nature of the segmentation algorithms allows them to not only find inflectional suffixes (such as -réis), but also more derivational phenomena such as the head nouns of compounds or even endings such as -tec, which identify technology oriented companies such as Vortec, Memotec and Portec and would not be regarded as a morphological suffix by traditional linguistics. Additionally, we extract shape features such as if a form contains digits or capital characters. This is important because many rare or unseen forms are proper names or numbers and often do not have meaningful suffixes. Our class-based morphological model is then interpolated with a word-based model to combine the generalization capabilities of the first and the high accuracy in case of sufficient data of the second. We evaluate our model across 21 European languages and find improvements between 3% and 11% in perplexity, a standard language modeling evaluation measure. Improvements are highest for languages with more productive and complex morphology such as Finnish and Estonian, but also visible for languages with a relatively simple morphology such as English and Dutch. We conclude that a morphological component yields consistent improvements for all the tested languages and argue that it should be part of every language model. Dependency trees represent the syntactic structure of a sentence by attaching each word to its syntactic head, the word it is directly modifying. Dependency parsing is usually tackled using heavily lexicalized (word-based) models and a thorough morphological preprocessing is important for optimal performance, especially for MRLS. We investigate if the lack of morphological features can be compensated by features induced using hidden Markov models with latent annotations (HMM-LAs) and find this to be the case for German. HMM-LAs were proposed as a method to increase part-of-speech tagging accuracy. The model splits the observed part-of-speech tags (such as verb and noun) into subtags. An expectation maximization algorithm is then used to fit the subtags to different roles. A verb tag for example might be split into an auxiliary verb and a full verb subtag. Such a split is usually beneficial because these two verb classes have different contexts. That is, a full verb might follow an auxiliary verb, but usually not another full verb. For German and English, we find that our model leads to consistent improvements over a parser not using subtag features. Looking at the labeled attachment score (LAS), the number of words correctly attached to their head, we observe an improvement from 90.34 to 90.75 for English and from 87.92 to 88.24 for German. For German, we additionally find that our model achieves almost the same performance (88.24) as a model using tags annotated by a supervised morphological tagger (LAS of 88.35). We also find that the German latent tags correlate with morphology. Articles for example are split by their grammatical case. We also investigate the part-of-speech tagging accuracies of models using the traditional treebank tagset and models using induced tagsets of the same size and find that the latter outperform the former, but are in turn outperformed by a discriminative tagger. Furthermore, we present a method for fast and accurate morphological tagging. While part-of-speech tagging annotates tokens in context with their respective word categories, morphological tagging produces a complete annotation containing all the relevant inflectional features such as case, gender and tense. A complete reading is represented as a single tag. As a reading might consist of several morphological features the resulting tagset usually contains hundreds or even thousands of tags. This is an issue for many decoding algorithms such as Viterbi which have runtimes depending quadratically on the number of tags. In the case of morphological tagging, the problem can be avoided by using a morphological analyzer. A morphological analyzer is a manually created finite-state transducer that produces the possible morphological readings of a word form. This analyzer can be used to prune the tagging lattice and to allow for the application of standard sequence labeling algorithms. The downside of this approach is that such an analyzer is not available for every language or might not have the coverage required for the task. Additionally, the output tags of some analyzers are not compatible with the annotations of the treebanks, which might require some manual mapping of the different annotations or even to reduce the complexity of the annotation. To avoid this problem we propose to use the posterior probabilities of a conditional random field (CRF) lattice to prune the space of possible taggings. At the zero-order level the posterior probabilities of a token can be calculated independently from the other tokens of a sentence. The necessary computations can thus be performed in linear time. The features available to the model at this time are similar to the features used by a morphological analyzer (essentially the word form and features based on it), but also include the immediate lexical context. As the ambiguity of word types varies substantially, we just fix the average number of readings after pruning by dynamically estimating a probability threshold. Once we obtain the pruned lattice, we can add tag transitions and convert it into a first-order lattice. The quadratic forward-backward computations are now executed on the remaining plausible readings and thus efficient. We can now continue pruning and extending the lattice order at a relatively low additional runtime cost (depending on the pruning thresholds). The training of the model can be implemented efficiently by applying stochastic gradient descent (SGD). The CRF gradient can be calculated from a lattice of any order as long as the correct reading is still in the lattice. During training, we thus run the lattice pruning until we either reach the maximal order or until the correct reading is pruned. If the reading is pruned we perform the gradient update with the highest order lattice still containing the reading. This approach is similar to early updating in the structured perceptron literature and forces the model to learn how to keep the correct readings in the lower order lattices. In practice, we observe a high number of lower updates during the first training epoch and almost exclusively higher order updates during later epochs. We evaluate our CRF tagger on six languages with different morphological properties. We find that for languages with a high word form ambiguity such as German, the pruning results in a moderate drop in tagging accuracy while for languages with less ambiguity such as Spanish and Hungarian the loss due to pruning is negligible. However, our pruning strategy allows us to train higher order models (order > 1), which give substantial improvements for all languages and also outperform unpruned first-order models. That is, the model might lose some of the correct readings during pruning, but is also able to solve more of the harder cases that require more context. We also find our model to substantially and significantly outperform a number of frequently used taggers such as Morfette and SVMTool. Based on our morphological tagger we develop a simple method to increase the performance of a state-of-the-art constituency parser. A constituency tree describes the syntactic properties of a sentence by assigning spans of text to a hierarchical bracket structure. developed a language-independent approach for the automatic annotation of accurate and compact grammars. Their implementation -- known as the Berkeley parser -- gives state-of-the-art results for many languages such as English and German. For some MRLS such as Basque and Korean, however, the parser gives unsatisfactory results because of its simple unknown word model. This model maps unknown words to a small number of signatures (similar to our morphological classes). These signatures do not seem expressive enough for many of the subtle distinctions made during parsing. We propose to replace rare words by the morphological reading generated by our tagger instead. The motivation is twofold. First, our tagger has access to a number of lexical and sublexical features not available during parsing. Second, we expect the morphological readings to contain most of the information required to make the correct parsing decision even though we know that things such as the correct attachment of prepositional phrases might require some notion of lexical semantics. In experiments on the SPMRL 2013 dataset of nine MRLS we find our method to give improvements for all languages except French for which we observe a minor drop in the Parseval score of 0.06. For Hebrew, Hungarian and Basque we find substantial absolute improvements of 5.65, 11.87 and 15.16, respectively. We also performed an extensive evaluation on the utility of word representations for morphological tagging. Our goal was to reduce the drop in performance that is caused when a model trained on a specific domain is applied to some other domain. This problem is usually addressed by domain adaption (DA). DA adapts a model towards a specific domain using a small amount of labeled or a huge amount of unlabeled data from that domain. However, this procedure requires us to train a model for every target domain. Instead we are trying to build a robust system that is trained on domain-specific labeled and domain-independent or general unlabeled data. We believe word representations to be key in the development of such models because they allow us to leverage unlabeled data efficiently. We compare data-driven representations to manually created morphological analyzers. We understand data-driven representations as models that cluster word forms or map them to a vectorial representation. Examples heavily used in the literature include Brown clusters, Singular Value Decompositions of count vectors and neural-network-based embeddings. We create a test suite of six languages consisting of in-domain and out-of-domain test sets. To this end we converted annotations for Spanish and Czech and annotated the German part of the Smultron treebank with a morphological layer. In our experiments on these data sets we find Brown clusters to outperform the other data-driven representations. Regarding the comparison with morphological analyzers, we find Brown clusters to give slightly better performance in part-of-speech tagging, but to be substantially outperformed in morphological tagging

Memory limitations are hidden in grammar

[Abstract] The ability to produce and understand an unlimited number of different sentences is a hallmark of human language. Linguists have sought to define the essence of this generative capacity using formal grammars that describe the syntactic dependencies between constituents, independent of the computational limitations of the human brain. Here, we evaluate this independence assumption by sampling sentences uniformly from the space of possible syntactic structures. We find that the average dependency distance between syntactically related words, a proxy for memory limitations, is less than expected by chance in a collection of state-of-the-art classes of dependency grammars. Our findings indicate that memory limitations have permeated grammatical descriptions, suggesting that it may be impossible to build a parsimonious theory of human linguistic productivity independent of non-linguistic cognitive constraints

Low Resources Machine Translation

METIS-II was a EU-FET MT project running from October 2004 to September 2007, which aimed at translating free text input without resorting to parallel corpora. The idea was to use ‘basic’ linguistic tools and representations and to link them with patterns and statistics from the monolingual target-language corpus. The METIS-II project has four partners, translating from their ‘home’ languages Greek, Dutch, German, and Spanish into English. The paper outlines the basic ideas of the project, their implementation, the resources used, and the results obtained. It also gives examples of how METIS-II has continued beyond its lifetime and the original scope of the project. On the basis of the results and experiences obtained, we believe that the approach is promising and offers the potential for development in various directions

An Unsolicited Soliloquy on Dependency Parsing

Programa Oficial de Doutoramento en Computación . 5009V01[Abstract] This thesis presents work on dependency parsing covering two distinct lines of research. The first aims to develop efficient parsers so that they can be fast enough to parse large amounts of data while still maintaining decent accuracy. We investigate two techniques to achieve this. The first is a cognitively-inspired method and the second uses a model distillation method. The first technique proved to be utterly dismal, while the second was somewhat of a success. The second line of research presented in this thesis evaluates parsers. This is also done in two ways. We aim to evaluate what causes variation in parsing performance for different algorithms and also different treebanks. This evaluation is grounded in dependency displacements (the directed distance between a dependent and its head) and the subsequent distributions associated with algorithms and the distributions found in treebanks. This work sheds some light on the variation in performance for both different algorithms and different treebanks. And the second part of this area focuses on the utility of part-of-speech tags when used with parsing systems and questions the standard position of assuming that they might help but they certainly won’t hurt.[Resumen] Esta tesis presenta trabajo sobre análisis de dependencias que cubre dos líneas de investigación distintas. La primera tiene como objetivo desarrollar analizadores eficientes, de modo que sean suficientemente rápidos como para analizar grandes volúmenes de datos y, al mismo tiempo, sean suficientemente precisos. Investigamos dos métodos. El primero se basa en teorías cognitivas y el segundo usa una técnica de destilación. La primera técnica resultó un enorme fracaso, mientras que la segunda fue en cierto modo un ´éxito. La otra línea evalúa los analizadores sintácticos. Esto también se hace de dos maneras. Evaluamos la causa de la variación en el rendimiento de los analizadores para distintos algoritmos y corpus. Esta evaluación utiliza la diferencia entre las distribuciones del desplazamiento de arista (la distancia dirigida de las aristas) correspondientes a cada algoritmo y corpus. También evalúa la diferencia entre las distribuciones del desplazamiento de arista en los datos de entrenamiento y prueba. Este trabajo esclarece las variaciones en el rendimiento para algoritmos y corpus diferentes. La segunda parte de esta línea investiga la utilidad de las etiquetas gramaticales para los analizadores sintácticos.[Resumo] Esta tese presenta traballo sobre análise sintáctica, cubrindo dúas liñas de investigación. A primeira aspira a desenvolver analizadores eficientes, de maneira que sexan suficientemente rápidos para procesar grandes volumes de datos e á vez sexan precisos. Investigamos dous métodos. O primeiro baséase nunha teoría cognitiva, e o segundo usa unha técnica de destilación. O primeiro método foi un enorme fracaso, mentres que o segundo foi en certo modo un éxito. A outra liña avalúa os analizadores sintácticos. Esto tamén se fai de dúas maneiras. Avaliamos a causa da variación no rendemento dos analizadores para distintos algoritmos e corpus. Esta avaliaci´on usa a diferencia entre as distribucións do desprazamento de arista (a distancia dirixida das aristas) correspondentes aos algoritmos e aos corpus. Tamén avalía a diferencia entre as distribucións do desprazamento de arista nos datos de adestramento e proba. Este traballo esclarece as variacións no rendemento para algoritmos e corpus diferentes. A segunda parte desta liña investiga a utilidade das etiquetas gramaticais para os analizadores sintácticos.This work has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (FASTPARSE, grant agreement No 714150) and from the Centro de Investigación de Galicia (CITIC) which is funded by the Xunta de Galicia and the European Union (ERDF - Galicia 2014-2020 Program) by grant ED431G 2019/01.Xunta de Galicia; ED431G 2019/0