754 research outputs found

    Mobile IP: state of the art report

    Get PDF
    Due to roaming, a mobile device may change its network attachment each time it moves to a new link. This might cause a disruption for the Internet data packets that have to reach the mobile node. Mobile IP is a protocol, developed by the Mobile IP Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) working group, that is able to inform the network about this change in network attachment such that the Internet data packets will be delivered in a seamless way to the new point of attachment. This document presents current developments and research activities in the Mobile IP area

    Reliable Multicast Transport for Heterogeneous Mobile IP environment using Cross-Layer Information

    Get PDF
    Reliable multicast transport architecture designed for heterogeneous mobile IP environment using cross-layer information for enhanced Quality of Service (QoS) and seamless handover is discussed. In particular, application-specific reliable multicast retransmission schemes are proposed, which are aimed to minimize the protocol overhead taking into account behaviour of mobile receivers (loss of connectivity and handover) and the specific application requirements for reliable delivery (such as carousel, one-to-many download and streaming delivery combined with recording). The proposed localized retransmission strategies are flexible configured for tree-based multicast transport. Cross layer interactions in order to enhance reliable transport and support seamless handover is discussed considering IEEE 802.21 media independent handover mechanisms. The implementation is based on Linux IPv6 environment. Simulations in ns2 focusing on the benefits of the proposed multicast retransmission schemes for particular application scenarios are presented

    Mobile-IP ad-hoc network MPLS-based with QoS support.

    Get PDF
    The support for Quality of Service (QoS) is the main focus of this thesis. Major issues and challenges for Mobile-IP Ad-Hoc Networks (MANETs) to support QoS in a multi-layer manner are considered discussed and investigated through simulation setups. Different parameters contributing to the subjective measures of QoS have been considered and consequently, appropriate testbeds were formed to measure these parameters and compare them to other schemes to check for superiority. These parameters are: Maximum Round-Trip Delay (MRTD), Minimum Bandwidth Guaranteed (MBG), Bit Error Rate (BER), Packet Loss Ratio (PER), End-To-End Delay (ETED), and Packet Drop Ratio (PDR) to name a few. For network simulations, NS-II (Network Simulator Version II) and OPNET simulation software systems were used.Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses & Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis2005 .A355. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 44-03, page: 1444. Thesis (M.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2005

    Mobile IP: state of the art report

    Get PDF

    IPv6: a new security challenge

    Get PDF
    Tese de mestrado em Segurança InformĂĄtica, apresentada Ă  Universidade de Lisboa, atravĂ©s da Faculdade de CiĂȘncias, 2011O Protocolo de Internet versĂŁo 6 (IPv6) foi desenvolvido com o intuito de resolver alguns dos problemas nĂŁo endereçados pelo seu antecessor, o Protocolo de Internet versĂŁo 4 (IPv4), nomeadamente questĂ”es relacionadas com segurança e com o espaço de endereçamento disponĂ­vel. SĂŁo muitos os que na Ășltima dĂ©cada tĂȘm desenvolvido estudos sobre os investimentos necessĂĄrios Ă  sua adoção e sobre qual o momento certo para que o mesmo seja adotado por todos os players no mercado. Recentemente, o problema da extinção de endereçamentos pĂșblicos a ser disponibilizado pelas diversas Region Internet registry – RIRs - despertou o conjunto de entidades envolvidas para que se agilizasse o processo de migração do IPv4 para o IPv6. Ao contrĂĄrio do IPv4, esta nova versĂŁo considera a segurança como um objetivo fundamental na sua implementação, nesse sentido Ă© recomendado o uso do protocolo IPsec ao nĂ­vel da camada de rede. No entanto, e devido Ă  imaturidade do protocolo e Ă  complexidade que este perĂ­odo de transição comporta, existem inĂșmeras implicaçÔes de segurança que devem ser consideradas neste perĂ­odo de migração. O objetivo principal deste trabalho Ă© definir um conjunto de boas prĂĄticas no Ăąmbito da segurança na implementação do IPv6 que possa ser utilizado pelos administradores de redes de dados e pelas equipas de segurança dos diversos players no mercado. Nesta fase de transição, Ă© de todo Ăștil e conveniente contribuir de forma eficiente na interpretação dos pontos fortes deste novo protocolo assim como nas vulnerabilidades a ele associadas.IPv6 was developed to address the exhaustion of IPv4 addresses, but has not yet seen global deployment. Recent trends are now finally changing this picture and IPv6 is expected to take off soon. Contrary to the original, this new version of the Internet Protocol has security as a design goal, for example with its mandatory support for network layer security. However, due to the immaturity of the protocol and the complexity of the transition period, there are several security implications that have to be considered when deploying IPv6. In this project, our goal is to define a set of best practices for IPv6 Security that could be used by IT staff and network administrators within an Internet Service Provider. To this end, an assessment of some of the available security techniques for IPv6 will be made by means of a set of laboratory experiments using real equipment from an Internet Service Provider in Portugal. As the transition for IPv6 seems inevitable this work can help ISPs in understanding the threats that exist in IPv6 networks and some of the prophylactic measures available, by offering recommendations to protect internal as well as customers’ networks

    Performance Assessment of Routing Protocols for IoT/6LoWPAN Networks

    Get PDF
    The Internet of Things (IoT) proposes a disruptive communication paradigm that allows smart objects to exchange data among themselves to reach a common goal. IoT application scenarios are multiple and can range from a simple smart home lighting system to fully controlled automated manufacturing chains. In the majority of IoT deployments, things are equipped with small devices that can suffer from severe hardware and energy restrictions that are responsible for performing data processing and wireless communication tasks. Thus, due to their features, communication networks that are used by these devices are generally categorized as Low Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). The considerable variation in IoT applications represents a critical issue to LLN networks, which should offer support to different requirements as well as keeping reasonable quality-of-service (QoS) levels. Based on this challenge, routing protocols represent a key issue in IoT scenarios deployment. Routing protocols are responsible for creating paths among devices and their interactions. Hence, network performance and features are highly dependent on protocol behavior. Also, based on the adopted protocol, the support for some specific requirements of IoT applications may or may not be provided. Thus, a routing protocol should be projected to attend the needs of the applications considering the limitations of the device that will execute them. Looking to attend the demand of routing protocols for LLNs and, consequently, for IoT networks, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has designed and standardized the IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). This protocol, although being robust and offering features to fulfill the need of several applications, still presents several faults and weaknesses (mainly related to its high complexity and memory requirement), which limits its adoption in IoT scenarios. An alternative to RPL, the Lightweight On-demand Ad Hoc Distancevector Routing Protocol – Next Generation (LOADng) has emerged as a less complicated routing solution for LLNs. However, the cost of its simplicity is paid for with the absence of adequate support for a critical set of features required for many IoT environments. Thus, based on the challenging open issues related to routing in IoT networks, this thesis aims to study and propose contributions to better attend the network requirements of IoT scenarios. A comprehensive survey, reviewing state-of-the-art routing protocols adopted for IoT, identified the strengths and weaknesses of current solutions available in the literature. Based on the identified limitations, a set of improvements is designed to overcome these issues and enhance IoT network performance. The novel solutions are proposed to include reliable and efficient support to attend the needs of IoT applications, such as mobility, heterogeneity, and different traffic patterns. Moreover, mechanisms to improve the network performance in IoT scenarios, which integrate devices with different communication technologies, are introduced. The studies conducted to assess the performance of the proposed solutions showed the high potential of the proposed solutions. When the approaches presented in this thesis were compared with others available in the literature, they presented very promising results considering the metrics related to the Quality of Service (QoS), network and energy efficiency, and memory usage as well as adding new features to the base protocols. Hence, it is believed that the proposed improvements contribute to the state-of-the-art of routing solutions for IoT networks, increasing the performance and adoption of enhanced protocols.A Internet das Coisas, do inglĂȘs Internet of Things (IoT), propĂ”e um paradigma de comunicação disruptivo para possibilitar que dispositivos, que podem ser dotados de comportamentos autĂłnomos ou inteligentes, troquem dados entre eles buscando alcançar um objetivo comum. Os cenĂĄrios de aplicação do IoT sĂŁo muito variados e podem abranger desde um simples sistema de iluminação para casa atĂ© o controle total de uma linha de produção industrial. Na maioria das instalaçÔes IoT, as “coisas” sĂŁo equipadas com um pequeno dispositivo, responsĂĄvel por realizar as tarefas de comunicação e processamento de dados, que pode sofrer com severas restriçÔes de hardware e energia. Assim, devido Ă s suas caracterĂ­sticas, a rede de comunicação criada por esses dispositivos Ă© geralmente categorizada como uma Low Power and Lossy Network (LLN). A grande variedade de cenĂĄrios IoT representam uma questĂŁo crucial para as LLNs, que devem oferecer suporte aos diferentes requisitos das aplicaçÔes, alĂ©m de manter nĂ­veis de qualidade de serviço, do inglĂȘs Quality of Service (QoS), adequados. Baseado neste desafio, os protocolos de encaminhamento constituem um aspecto chave na implementação de cenĂĄrios IoT. Os protocolos de encaminhamento sĂŁo responsĂĄveis por criar os caminhos entre os dispositivos e permitir suas interaçÔes. Assim, o desempenho e as caracterĂ­sticas da rede sĂŁo altamente dependentes do comportamento destes protocolos. Adicionalmente, com base no protocolo adotado, o suporte a alguns requisitos especĂ­ficos das aplicaçÔes de IoT podem ou nĂŁo ser fornecidos. Portanto, estes protocolos devem ser projetados para atender as necessidades das aplicaçÔes assim como considerando as limitaçÔes do hardware no qual serĂŁo executados. Procurando atender Ă s necessidades dos protocolos de encaminhamento em LLNs e, consequentemente, das redes IoT, a Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) desenvolveu e padronizou o IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL). O protocolo, embora seja robusto e ofereça recursos para atender Ă s necessidades de diferentes aplicaçÔes, apresenta algumas falhas e fraquezas (principalmente relacionadas com a sua alta complexidade e necessidade de memĂłria) que limitam sua adoção em cenĂĄrios IoT. Em alternativa ao RPL, o Lightweight On-demand Ad hoc Distance-vector Routing Protocol – Next Generation (LOADng) emergiu como uma solução de encaminhamento menos complexa para as LLNs. Contudo, o preço da simplicidade Ă© pago com a falta de suporte adequado para um conjunto de recursos essenciais necessĂĄrios em muitos ambientes IoT. Assim, inspirado pelas desafiadoras questĂ”es ainda em aberto relacionadas com o encaminhamento em redes IoT, esta tese tem como objetivo estudar e propor contribuiçÔes para melhor atender os requisitos de rede em cenĂĄrios IoT. Uma profunda e abrangente revisĂŁo do estado da arte sobre os protocolos de encaminhamento adotados em IoT identificou os pontos fortes e limitaçÔes das soluçÔes atuais. Com base nas debilidades encontradas, um conjunto de soluçÔes de melhoria Ă© proposto para superar carĂȘncias existentes e melhorar o desempenho das redes IoT. As novas soluçÔes sĂŁo propostas para incluir um suporte confiĂĄvel e eficiente capaz atender Ă s necessidades das aplicaçÔes IoT relacionadas com suporte Ă  mobilidade, heterogeneidade dos dispositivos e diferentes padrĂ”es de trĂĄfego. AlĂ©m disso, sĂŁo introduzidos mecanismos para melhorar o desempenho da rede em cenĂĄrios IoT que integram dispositivos com diferentes tecnologias de comunicação. Os vĂĄrios estudos realizados para mensurar o desempenho das soluçÔes propostas mostraram o grande potencial do conjunto de melhorias introduzidas. Quando comparadas com outras abordagens existentes na literatura, as soluçÔes propostas nesta tese demonstraram um aumento do desempenho consistente para mĂ©tricas relacionadas a qualidade de serviço, uso de memĂłria, eficiĂȘncia energĂ©tica e de rede, alĂ©m de adicionar novas funcionalidades aos protocolos base. Portanto, acredita-se que as melhorias propostas contribuiem para o avanço do estado da arte em soluçÔes de encaminhamento para redes IoT e aumentar a adoção e utilização dos protocolos estudados

    Advanced Signaling Support for IP-based Networks

    Get PDF
    This work develops a set of advanced signaling concepts for IP-based networks. It proposes a design for secure and authentic signaling and provides QoS signaling support for mobile users. Furthermore, this work develops methods which allow for scalable QoS signaling by realizing QoS-based group communication mechanisms and through aggregation of resource reservations

    Internet Protocol version 6 and the future of home networking

    Get PDF
    Home networking will be more of a necessity in the future than it is today. The homes of the future will make our lives easier in many ways. As microprocessors become less expensive and require less power they will be implanted into many of the common household items used everyday. Appliances and components will evolve into smart devices that communicate with each other. Connecting these devices will become more important as devices incorporate new technologies. It will be necessary to build a network that can handle the needs of this type of computing environment. The home networks of the future will require many of the same features that can be found in today\u27s corporate networks. However, there will be four issues that will determine the level of success of implementing home networks. The first issue is the increase in volume of the devices accessing and utilizing the Internet. Security will be a high priority for homeowners, since the data that accumulates and circulates in and out of the home is sensitive and personal. The third critical issue is ease of use, because the average homeowner does not have the skills necessary to configure and maintain networks. The last issue that will be important in the home is the increased need for bandwidth and the ability to accommodate all types of data traffic. There is no doubt that the Internet Protocol will be important in future home networks. Some proponents of IP say IP over everything The trend has been finding new ways of making IP the answer to all types of voice and data communications. Initially the Internet Protocol was designed for a specific application. Over time, IPv4 has been able to successfully adapt to the changing needs and demands of the Internet. At one point in the early 90\u27s, it was feared that IPv4 would not be able to meet the future needs. As a result, The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) developed a next generation Internet Protocol, referred to as Internet Protocol version 6. In the meantime, new fixes to old IPv4 problems have been temporarily halted. The implementation of IPv6 has been extremely slow since the imminent danger of declining address space has been temporarily addressed. IP version 6 has many new features built into the protocol that will streamline and enhance many aspects of the network, but these features alone may not be enough to cause the displacement of the massive infrastructure of IPv4. Will IPv6 be better at handling the demands of the home networks of the future, or will the additions and updates for IPv4 be sufficient? What are some of the resolutions that are being developed or are already implemented for the key issues in home networks- the increasing number of devices, security, ease of use and data flow
    • 

    corecore