Constructive Design of a Hierarchy of Semantics of a Transition System by Abstract Interpretation

We construct a hierarchy of semantics by successive abstract interpretations. Starting from the maximal trace semantics of a transition system, we derive the big-step semantics, termination and nontermination semantics, Plotkin’s natural, Smyth’s demoniac and Hoare’s angelic relational semantics and equivalent nondeterministic denotational semantics (with alternative powerdomains to the Egli-Milner and Smyth constructions), D. Scott’s deterministic denotational semantics, the generalized and Dijkstra’s conservative/liberal predicate transformer semantics, the generalized/total and Hoare’s partial correctness axiomatic semantics and the corresponding proof methods. All the semantics are presented in a uniform fixpoint form and the correspondences between these semantics are established through composable Galois connections, each semantics being formally calculated by abstract interpretation of a more concrete one using Kleene and/or Tarsk

Reconciling Shannon and Scott with a Lattice of Computable Information

This paper proposes a reconciliation of two different theories of information. The first, originally proposed in a lesser-known work by Claude Shannon (some five years after the publication of his celebrated quantitative theory of communication), describes how the information content of channels can be described qualitatively, but still abstractly, in terms of information elements, where information elements can be viewed as equivalence relations over the data source domain. Shannon showed that these elements have a partial ordering, expressing when one information element is more informative than another, and that these partially ordered information elements form a complete lattice. In the context of security and information flow this structure has been independently rediscovered several times, and used as a foundation for understanding and reasoning about information flow. The second theory of information is Dana Scott\u27s domain theory, a mathematical framework for giving meaning to programs as continuous functions over a particular topology. Scott\u27s partial ordering also represents when one element is more informative than another, but in the sense of computational progress - i.e. when one element is a more defined or evolved version of another. To give a satisfactory account of information flow in computer programs it is necessary to consider both theories together, in order to understand not only what information is conveyed by a program (viewed as a channel, \ue0 la Shannon) but also how the precision with which that information can be observed is determined by the definedness of its encoding (\ue0 la Scott). To this end we show how these theories can be fruitfully combined, by defining the Lattice of Computable Information (LoCI), a lattice of preorders rather than equivalence relations. LoCI retains the rich lattice structure of Shannon\u27s theory, filters out elements that do not make computational sense, and refines the remaining information elements to reflect how Scott\u27s ordering captures possible varieties in the way that information is presented. We show how the new theory facilitates the first general definition of termination-insensitive information flow properties, a weakened form of information flow property commonly targeted by static program analyses

Nondeterministic Relational Semantics of a while Program

A relational semantics is a mapping of programs to relations. We consider that the input-output semantics of a program is given by a relation on its set of states; in a nondeterministic context, this relation is calculated by considering the worst behavior of the program (demonic relational semantics). In this paper, we concentrate on while loops. Calculating the relational abstraction (semantics) of a loop is difficult, but showing the correctness of any candidate abstraction is much easier. For functional programs, Mills has described a checking method known as the while statement verification rule. A programming theorem for iterative constructs is proposed, proved, demonstrated and applied for an example. This theorem can be considered as a generalization of the while statement verification to nondeterministic loops.&nbsp

Expression Refinement

This thesis presents a refinement calculus for expressions. The aim of refinement calculi is to make programming a mathematical activity, and thereby improve the correctness of programs. To achieve this, a refinement calculus provides a formal language and a set of rules that allow transformations of the language terms. Using a refinement calculus, to produce a correct program, the programmer writes a possibly non-algorithmic or inefficient term that nevertheless obviously describes the intended program. This term is the specification, and it is transformed into an efficient program by syntactic transformation, using the rules of the refinement calculus. This transformation is refinement

Demonic fixed points

We deal with a relational model for the demonic semantics of programs. The demonic semantics of a while loop is given as a fixed point of a function involving the demonic operators. This motivates us to investigate the fixed points of these functions. We give the expression of the greatest fixed point with respect to the demonic ordering (demonic inclusion) of the semantic function. We prove that this greatest fixed coincides with the least fixed point with respect to the usual ordering (angelic inclusion) of the same function. This is followed by an example of application

Calculi for higher order communicating systems

This thesis develops two Calculi for Higher Order Communicating Systems. Both calculi consider sending and receiving processes to be as fundamental as nondeterminism and parallel composition. The first calculus called CHOCS is an extension of Milner's CCS in the sense that all the constructions of CCS are included or may be derived from more fundamental constructs. Most of the mathematical framework of CCS carries over almost unchanged. The operational semantics of CHOCS is given as a labelled transition system and it is a direct extension of the semantics of CCS with value passing. A set of algebraic laws satisfied by the calculus is presented. These are similar to the CCS laws only introducing obvious extra laws for sending and receiving processes. The power of process passing is underlined by a result showing that the recursion operator is unnecessary in the sense that recursion can be simulated by means of process passing and communication. The CHOCS language is also studied by means of a denotational semantics. A major result is the full abstractness of this semantics with respect to the operational semantics. The denotational semantics is used to provide an easy proof of the simulation of recursion. Introducing processes as first class objects yields a powerful metalanguage. It is shown that it is possible to simulate various reduction strategies of the untyped λ-Calculus in CHOCS. As pointed out by Milner, CCS has its limitations when one wants to describe unboundedly expanding systems, e.g. an unbounded number of procedure invocations in an imperative concurrent programming language P with recursive procedures. CHOCS may neatly describe both call-by-value and call-by-reference parameter mechanisms for P. We also consider call-by-name and lazy parameter mechanisms for P. The second calculus is called Plain CHOCS. Essential to the new calculus is the treatment of restriction as a static binding operator on port names. This calculus is given an operational semantics using labelled transition systems which combines ideas from the applicative transition systems described by Abramsky and the transition systems used for CHOCS. This calculus enjoys algebraic properties which are similar to those of CHOCS only needing obvious extra laws for the static nature of the restriction operator. Processes as first class objects enable description of networks with changing interconnection structure and there is a close connection between the Plain CHOCS calculus and the π-Calculus described by Milner, Parrow and Walker: the two calculi can simulate one another. Recently object oriented programming has grown into a major discipline in computational practice as well as in computer science. From a theoretical point of view object oriented programming presents a challenge to any metalanguage since most object oriented languages have no formal semantics. We show how Plain CHOCS may be used to give a semantics to a prototype object oriented language called 0.Open Acess