62 research outputs found

    Innovations in Quantitative Risk Management

    Get PDF
    Quantitative Finance; Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences; Finance/Investment/Banking; Actuarial Science

    Data-Driven Models: An Alternative Discrete Hedging Strategy

    Get PDF
    Options hedging is a critical problem in financial risk management. The prevailing approach in financial derivative pricing and hedging has been to first assume a parametric model describing the underlying price dynamics. An option model function is then calibrated to current market option prices and various sensitivities are computed and used to hedge the option risk. It has been recognized that computing hedging position from the sensitivity of the calibrated model option value function is inadequate in minimizing the variance of the option hedging risk, as it fails to capture the model parameter dependence on the underlying price. We propose several data-driven approaches to directly learn a hedging function from the historical market option and underlying data by minimizing certain measures of the local hedging risk and total hedging risk. This thesis will focus on answering the following questions: 1) Can we efficiently build direct data-driven models for discrete hedging problems that outperform existing state-of-art parametric hedging models based on the market prices? 2) Can we incorporate feature selection and feature extraction into the data-driven models to further improve the performance of the discrete hedging? 3) Can we build efficient models for both the one-step local risk hedging problem and multi-step total risk hedging problem based on the state-of-art learning framework such as deep learning framework and kernel learning framework? Using the S&P 500 index daily options data for more than a decade ending in August 2015, we first propose a direct data-driven approach based on kernel learning framework and we demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the parametric minimum variance hedging method, as well as minimum variance hedging corrective techniques based on stochastic volatility or local volatility models. Furthermore, we show that the proposed approach achieves significant gain over the implied Black-Sholes delta hedging for weekly and monthly hedging. Following the direct data-driven kernel learning approach, we propose a robust encoder-decoder Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) model, for optimal discrete option hedging. The proposed model utilizes the Black-Scholes model as a pre-trained model and incorporates sequential information and feature selection. Using the S&P 500 index European option market data from January 2, 2004, to August 31, 2015, we demonstrate that the weekly and monthly hedging performance of the proposed model significantly surpasses that of the data-driven minimum variance (MV) method, the regularized kernel data-driven model, and the SABR-Bartlett method. In addition, the daily hedging performance of the proposed model also surpasses that of MV methods based on parametric models, the kernel method, and the SABR-Bartlett method. Lastly, we design multi-step data-driven models to hedge the option discretely until the expiry. We utilize the SABR model and Local Volatility Function (LVF) to augment existing market data and thus alleviate the problem of scarcity in market option prices. The augmented market data is used to train a sufficient total risk hedging model

    Innovations in Quantitative Risk Management

    Get PDF
    Quantitative Finance; Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences; Finance/Investment/Banking; Actuarial Science

    Efficient pricing and estimation methods in finance

    Get PDF
    [Abstract not given by author

    Hedging Contingent Claims in Markets with Jumps

    Get PDF
    Contrary to the Black-Scholes paradigm, an option-pricing model which incorporates the possibility of jumps more accurately reflects the evolution of stocks in the real world. However, hedging a contingent claim in such a model is a non-trivial issue: in many cases, an infinite number of hedging instruments are required to eliminate the risk of an option position. This thesis develops practical techniques for hedging contingent claims in markets with jumps. Both regime-switching and jump-diffusion models are considered

    ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์ „๋žต ๋ฐ ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž์‚ฐ ํˆฌ์ž

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์‚ฐ์—…๊ณตํ•™๊ณผ, 2022. 8. ์ด์žฌ์šฑ.์ž์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”์™€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์˜ ํ•ต์‹ฌ ์š”์†Œ์ด๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”๋ž€ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ฐ„ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ž์‚ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ž€ ์ž์‚ฐ์˜ ์ž ์žฌ์  ์œ„ํ—˜๊ณผ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„์„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ์ฃผ์–ด์ง„ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•˜๋ฐฉ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ ˆ์ฐจ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์ „๋žต ์‹œํ–‰์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชจํ˜• ๊ฐœ์„  ๋ฐ ์‹œํ–‰์ด๋‹ค. ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋‚ด์žฌ์  ํ•œ๊ณ„๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ ์ ˆํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ํ•ด๋‹น ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ์ถ”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์–ด ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค๊ฐ€ ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋˜๋Š” ๋ฌธ์ œ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ž์‚ฐ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ํ•œ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ž์‚ฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฐ€์น˜ ๋ฐฉ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ํˆฌ์ž๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ตฐ ์„ ํƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ž์‚ฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ์ž‘์€ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž์‚ฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์„ ํƒ์ด ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ตฌ์ถ•์— ์žˆ์–ด ์ž ์žฌ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ํ•ต์‹ฌ๊ณผ ์ ˆ์ฐจ์— ์ดˆ์ ์„ ๋งž์ถ”์–ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”์™€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ด€์ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ธฐ์กด ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์ด ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์ •๋ฆฌ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๋ชจํ˜• ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ•œ๊ณ„์ ์„ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ธ”๋ž™-๋ฆฌํ„ฐ๋งŒ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์ „๋ง ๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ณผ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ •์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ๊ณผ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋•Œ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ๋งˆ์ฝ”์œ„์ธ ์˜ ํ‰๊ท -๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจํ˜•์„, ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด, ์ž์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ์ด์™ธ์˜ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ ์ธ ๊ธˆ์œต ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์˜๋ฏธ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŒจํ„ด์„ ์ถ”์ถœํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ธ”๋ž™-๋ฆฌํ„ฐ๋งŒ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์ „๋ง ๊ตฌ์ถ•์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด ๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ์ „๋žต์—์„œ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ •์˜ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹ค์ฆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š”, ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์‚ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ์ž์‚ฐ๊ตฐ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ด„์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ทธ ๊ฒฝ์ œํ•™์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•ด ๋ณด์•˜๊ณ , ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ธก์ • ์ง€ํ‘œ์™€ ํˆฌ์ž์ž ํšจ์šฉ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ์‹ค์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ์ฃผ์š” ์‹ค์ฆ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ, ๊ธฐ์—… ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „๋ง์— ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ๋ธ”๋ž™-๋ฆฌํ„ฐ๋งŒ ๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ ์‚ฐ์ถœ๋œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์˜ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ธฐ์—… ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ๋•Œ, ๊ณผ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋‹จ์ˆœํžˆ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฏธ๋ž˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ๋•Œ ํ‘œ๋ณธ ์™ธ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ›จ์”ฌ ํฐ ๊ฐœ์„ ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ•ด๋‹น ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š”, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ ์ œ์•ˆ๋œ ๊ธฐ์—… ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ „๋ง ๊ตฌ์ถ• ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ธ”๋ž™-๋ฆฌํ„ฐ๋งŒ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋” ์ž˜ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ๋”์šฑ ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ, ๊ณ„๋Ÿ‰ ๊ฒฝ์ œ ๋ชจํ˜• ๋ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์‹ค์ฆ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์‚ฐ์— ์‹œ์žฅ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ—ค์ง€, ์•ˆ์ „ ํ”ผ๋‚œ์ฒ˜, ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ์ฆ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ตญ๊ฐ€์˜ ์ฃผ์‹ ์‹œ์žฅ, ์›์œ  ์‹œ์žฅ, ์ฑ„๊ถŒ ์‹œ์žฅ, ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ง€์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํ—ค์ง€ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ „ ํ”ผ๋‚œ์ฒ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ์ˆ˜์ต๋ฅ  ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋ณ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ทธ ์ •๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ์ง„๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ COVID-19 ์œ„๊ธฐ ๋™์•ˆ, ์ฑ„๊ถŒ ์‹œ์žฅ ๋ฐ ๋‹ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ง€์ˆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ํ”ผ๋‚œ์ฒ˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ๊ณผ ๋งค์šฐ ๊ตฌ๋ณ„๋˜๋Š” ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์œผ๋กœ์จ, ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„, ๊ณตํ–‰์„ฑ, ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์Šคํ•„์˜ค๋ฒ„ ํšจ๊ณผ ๋ฐ ๋งˆ์ฝ”์œ„์ธ ์˜ ํ‰๊ท -๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์‚ฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐ•ํ•œ ๋ถ„์‚ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด, ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ์˜ ํŽธ์ž…์ด ๊ท ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ๋ถ„ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•๊ณผ ์ ‘์  ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ƒคํ”„ ๋น„์œจ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๊ฐœ์„  ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์…‹์งธ, ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฐ€์น˜ ๋ฐฉ์–ด ์˜ค์ฐจ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ์ „๋žต์— ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์•…์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ์กด์žฌํ•จ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ์‹ค์ œ ๊ธˆ์œต ์‹œ์žฅ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กญ๊ฒŒ๋„, ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฐ€์น˜ ๋ฐฉ์–ด ์˜ค์ฐจ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„์™€ ์ง์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ด€๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š”, ๋”์šฑ ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜์˜ ๋ชจ์ˆ˜ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์™„ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ์‹ค์ฆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ์จ, ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ๋ชจํ˜•๋ณด๋‹ค ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ข‹๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ์ค‘ ์ต์ŠคํŠธ๋ฆผ ๊ทธ๋ผ๋””์–ธํŠธ ๋ถ€์ŠคํŒ… (XGB) ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ฐ€์น˜ ๋ฐฉ์–ด ์˜ค์ฐจ ๋ฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ ์˜ˆ์ธก ์˜ค์ฐจ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ข‹์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ž„์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์€ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•™์Šต ๋ชจํ˜•์ด ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ชจํ˜• ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹คํ˜„ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ (realized volatility)์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ํŒŒ๋™ ํŒจํ„ด์„, ๋งค์šฐ ๋ณ€๋™์„ฑ์ด ํฐ ์‹œ์žฅ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ๋”์šฑ ์ž˜ ์žก์•„๋‚ธ๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ์ง€์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ผ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ํ•˜๋ฐฉ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ, ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต๋“ค์ด ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ๋ฒค์น˜๋งˆํฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ข‹์€ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์ž„์„ ์‹ค์ฆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต๋“ค์€ ๋งค์ˆ˜ ํ›„ ๋ณด์œ  ์ „๋žต๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ์ž‘์€ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กญ๊ฒŒ๋„, ํšจ์šฉํ•จ์ˆ˜์˜ ๊ณก๋ฅ  ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ, ์ „๋ง ์ด๋ก  ํˆฌ์ž์ž์˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์„ ํƒ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ํšจ์šฉ ์ด๋ก  ํˆฌ์ž์ž์˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์„ ํƒ์˜ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์ด ์„œ๋กœ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚จ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š”, ์ „๋ง ์ด๋ก  ํˆฌ์ž์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ต ๋Œ€๋น„ ์†์‹ค์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์ด ๋” ํด ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด, ํˆฌ์ž์ž์˜ ์†์‹ค ํšŒํ”ผ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํˆฌ์ž์ž์˜ ์„ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ•ํ™”์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†€๋ผ์šด ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ์จ, ํˆฌ์ž์ž๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋–ค ํšจ์šฉ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋”ฐ๋ฅด๋Š”์ง€์— ๊ด€๊ณ„์—†์ด, ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต์ด ๋งค์ˆ˜ ํ›„ ๋ณด์œ  ์ „๋žต ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋†’์€ ํšจ์šฉ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์ด ๊ธฐ์กด ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๋„“์Œ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ์ „๋žต์ด ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ํˆฌ์ž์ž์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๋” ํฐ ๊ฒฝ์ œํ•™์  ๊ฐ€์น˜๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ด ์ค„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹ค์ฆํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ผ๋Š” ์ ์—์„œ ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋ธ”๋ž™-๋ฆฌํ„ฐ๋งŒ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ž์‚ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์™€ ํ•ฉ์„ฑ ํ’‹ ์˜ต์…˜ ์ „๋žต์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ์ž์‚ฐ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”์™€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋งˆ์ฝ”์œ„์ธ ์˜ ํ‰๊ท -๋ถ„์‚ฐ ๋ชจํ˜•๊ณผ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ณดํ—˜ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์ฒด๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ ํ† ํฐ๊ณผ ์•”ํ˜ธํ™”ํ ์‹œ์žฅ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋””์ง€ํ„ธ ์ž์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ, ํˆฌ์ž์ž๋“ค์€ ์ž์‚ฐ ๋ถ„์‚ฐํ™”์™€ ์œ„ํ—˜ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ์ „๋žต์„ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ์„ ๋œ ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋”์šฑ๋” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ด๊ณ  ๋ฐ”๋žŒ์งํ•œ ํˆฌ์ž ํฌํŠธํด๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ฒŒ ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.The core of portfolio management is asset diversification and risk management. Asset diversification is to maximize the diversification effect for a multi-asset portfolio based on asset allocation by estimating the correlation between assets. Risk management is to minimize the downside risk for a given portfolio based on asset allocation by estimating the potential risk and volatility of an asset. The essential portfolio management procedure is twofold; (i) model improvement and implementation for appropriate model specifications and portfolio construction and (ii) asset class selection for investment. The first part is necessary to implement the strategy adequately to achieve the aim of that model, such as robust multi-asset portfolio management via asset diversification and single asset risk management via robust protection level maintenance. The second part is vital because a new asset class uncorrelated to the traditional asset class has potential opportunities for efficient portfolio construction. Accordingly, this dissertation focuses on research from two perspectives dealing with the above two essential procedures. Regarding the perspective of asset diversification and risk management, the first is a study on addressing and improving the existing portfolio strategy models' limitations in model construction and estimation of input parameters for appropriate model specification. The second is a portfolio analysis of new emerging asset markets. The first aim of this dissertation is to improve the existing portfolio management strategy in model construction for the Blackโ€“Litterman framework and input parameter estimation for the synthetic put strategy for the appropriate model specification. The second aim is to investigate the empirical results using portfolio analysis in the emerging digital asset markets, including Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and the cryptocurrency market, based on the mean-variance framework or portfolio insurance framework. For the first aim, we propose to use machine learning-based models to extract the meaningful pattern of external financial data for the Blackโ€“Litterman model using firm characteristics. Furthermore, we propose to use machine learning-based forecasting models to estimate the input parameters required for portfolio insurance strategy to mitigate the difficulty of addressing complex financial data. For the second aim, we examine the economic value of NFT in terms of diversification effect on traditional asset-based portfolios and portfolio insurance strategy results regarding various risk measures and investor's utility in the cryptocurrency market. The main findings in this dissertation are summarized as follows. First, our empirical results show that combining characteristics into view improves the distribution of portfolio returns in the Blackโ€“Litterman approach. Furthermore, prediction via machine learning affects improvement in the out-of-sample performance compared to using past information. Our study suggests that using the proposed model can result in a more efficient and diversified portfolio of the Blackโ€“Litterman framework. Second, our empirical results of portfolio analysis in the NFT market show evidence of the hedge, safe haven, and diversification properties of NFTs, confirming two main findings: (i) NFTs act as a hedge and safe haven for several country's stock markets and oil, bond, and USD indices and these effects in stock markets fade as frequency changes, especially showing stronger safe haven benefits for bond and USD indices during the COVID-19 periods, and (ii) NFTs are distinct from traditional assets, potentially resulting in portfolio diversification which is confirmed by preliminary analysis including correlation, co-movement, and volatility spillover and portfolio analysis based on Markowitz's meanโ€“variance framework, improving the performance of equally weighted and tangency portfolio strategies in terms of Sharpe ratio. Third, our findings indicate that the adverse effect of volatility misestimation exists in terms of protection level error in the synthetic put strategy. We surprisingly find the protection error of insured portfolios directly linked to the precision of volatility forecasting, implying that this misestimation issue can be mitigated by employing more accurate volatility forecasting models. Another finding is that all methodologies, including traditional and machine learning-type, are better than the naive approach. Moreover, machine learning-type models, especially XGB, are the best in terms of protection and forecasting error in implementing the synthetic put strategy. This tendency supports the evidence that machine learning is better than traditional models in capturing the complex fluctuation pattern of realized volatility in highly volatile market conditions. Finally, our findings demonstrate the outperformance of portfolio insurance strategies in terms of skewness and downside risks in the cryptocurrency market. It reveals the lower-risk feature of these strategies compared to buy-and-hold. Moreover, we surprisingly find that, in terms of curvature, the portfolio choice of prospect theory investors is opposite to the expected utility theory investors. It implies the greater impact of losses than gains on the prospect theory investors. The larger loss-aversion propensity reinforces investors' preference for portfolio insurance strategies. As the most shocking result, we find portfolio insurance, when compared to the buy-and-hold strategy, provides a better opportunity to offer a higher utility in the cryptocurrency market than the traditional stock market, regardless of the investor's utility. It implies that portfolio insurance strategies can provide greater economic value in terms of risk management for a larger number of cryptocurrency investors. By improving the portfolio management models in terms of asset diversification of the multi-asset portfolio of the Blackโ€“Litterman model and risk management of a given portfolio or a single asset of synthetic put strategy, and by examining the portfolio analysis in new digital asset markets such as NFT and cryptocurrency market based on mean-variance and portfolio insurance framework, this dissertation's overall findings can help investors achieve an improved portfolio strategy and obtain a more efficient and well-diversified portfolio for the improved portfolio management.Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and motivation 1 1.2 Aims of the Dissertation 11 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 13 Chapter 2 Blackโ€“Litterman model considering firm characteristic variables 15 2.1 Chapter overview 15 2.2 Data and Methodology 17 2.2.1 Data 17 2.2.2 Methodology 18 2.3 Empirical results 25 Chapter 3 Portfolio analysis for Non-Fungible Token market 28 3.1 Chapter overview 28 3.2 Data 31 3.2.1 Data for a hedge and safe haven effect 32 3.2.2 Data for a diversification effect 33 3.3 Methodology 36 3.3.1 Methods for a hedge and safe haven effect 36 3.3.2 Methods for a diversification effect 38 3.4 Empirical results 41 3.4.1 Results of a hedge and safe haven effect 41 3.4.2 Results of a diversification effect 49 Chapter 4 Volatility forecasting for portfolio insurance strategy 57 4.1 Chapter overview 57 4.2 Data 63 4.2.1 The Monte Carlo simulation data 63 4.2.2 The real-world data 66 4.3 Portfolio insurance strategy 69 4.3.1 Synthetic put strategy 69 4.3.2 Protection level error 73 4.4 Volatility forecasting models 76 4.4.1 Naive model 76 4.4.2 GARCH-type models 77 4.4.3 HAR-RV-type models 79 4.4.4 Machine learning-type models 81 4.4.5 Forecasting performance measure and statistical test 89 4.5 Experimental design and procedure 90 4.5.1 The Monte Carlo simulation 91 4.5.2 The real-world data simulation 92 4.6 Empirical results 94 4.6.1 The Monte Carlo simulation results 94 4.6.2 The real-world data simulation results 99 Chapter 5 Portfolio insurance strategy in the cryptocurrency market 108 5.1 Chapter overview 108 5.2 Portfolio insurance strategies 123 5.2.1 SL strategy 123 5.2.2 CPPI strategy 124 5.2.3 TIPP strategy 126 5.2.4 VBPI strategy 127 5.3 Downside risks 130 5.3.1 MDD and AvDD 130 5.3.2 VaR 132 5.3.3 ES 133 5.3.4 Semideviation 133 5.3.5 Omega ratio 134 5.4 Investorโ€™s utility 136 5.4.1 Expected utility theory 136 5.4.2 Prospect theory 138 5.5 Data and experimental design 140 5.5.1 Data 140 5.5.2 Experimental design 143 5.6 Empirical results 147 5.6.1 Downside risk results 147 5.6.2 Investorโ€™s utility results 159 Chapter 6 Conclusion 167 6.1 Summary and contributions 167 6.2 Future work 178 Bibliography 180 Appendices 218 A Appendix to Chapter 3 218 B Appendix to Chapter 4 220 C Appendix to Chapter 5 220 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 228๋ฐ•

    Several Mathematical Problems in Investment Management

    Get PDF
    This thesis studies four mathematical problems in investment management. All four problems arise from practical challenges and are data-driven. Chapter 2 investigates the Kelly portfolio strategy. The full Kelly strategy's deficiency in the face of estimation errors in practice can be mitigated by fractional or shrinkage Kelly strategies. This chapter provides an alternative, the RL Kelly strategy, based on a reinforcement learning (RL) framework. RL algorithms are developed for the practical implementation of the RL Kelly strategy. Extensive simulation studies are conducted, and the results confirm the superior performance of the RL Kelly strategies. In Chapter 3, we study the discrete-time mean-variance problem under an RL framework. The continuous-time problem was theoretically studied by the existing literature but was subject to a discretization error in implementations. We compare our discrete-time model with the continuous-time model in terms of theoretical results and numerical performance. In a daily trading market setting, we find both discrete-time and continuous-time models achieve comparable performance. However, the discrete-time model outperforms better than the continuous-time model when the trading is less frequent. Our discrete-time model is not subject to the discretization error. Chapter 4 explores the valuation problem of large variable annuity (VA) portfolios. A computationally appealing methodology for the valuation of large VA portfolios is a metamodelling framework that evaluates a small set of representative contracts, fits a predictive model based on these computed values, and then extrapolates the model to estimate the values of the remaining contracts. This chapter proposes a new two-phase procedure for selecting representative contracts. The representatives from the first phase are determined using contract attributes as in existing metamodelling approaches, but those in the second phase are chosen by utilizing the information contained in the values of the representatives from the first phase. Two numerical studies confirm that our two-phase selection procedure improves upon conventional approaches from the existing literature. Chapter 5 focuses on the capture ratio which is a widely-used investment performance measure. We study the statistical problem of estimating the capture ratio based on a finite number of observations of a fund's returns. We derive the asymptotic distribution of the estimator, and use it for testing whether one fund has a capture ratio that is statistically significantly higher than another. We also perform hypothesis tests with real-world hedge fund data. Our analysis raises concerns regarding the models and sample sizes used for estimating capture ratios in practice

    Optimal portfolio allocation of commodity related assets using a controlled forward-backward algorithm

    Get PDF
    In the first part of this thesis we develop an investment consumption model with convex transaction costs and optional stochastic returns for a finite time horizon. The model is a simplified approach for the investment in a portfolio of commodity related assets like real options or production facilities. In contrast to common models like [Awerbuch, Burger 2003] our model is a multi time step approach that optimizes the investment strategy rather then calculating a static imaginary optimal portfolio. On one hand, our numerical results are consistent with the well-known investment-consumption theory in the literature. On the other hand, this is the first in-depth numerical study of a case with convex transaction costs and optional returns. Our focus in the analyses is the form of the investment strategy and its behavior with respect to model parameters. In the second part, an algorithm for solving continuous-time stochastic optimalcontrol problems is presented. The numerical scheme is based on the Stochastic Maximum Principle (SMP) as an alternative to the widely studied dynamic programming principle (DPP). By using the SMP, [Peng 1990] obtained a system of coupled forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDE) with an external optimality condition. We extend the numerical scheme of [Delarue, Menozzi 2005] by a Newton-Raphson method to solve the FBSDE system and the optimality condition simultaneously. This is the first fully implemented algorithm for the solution of stochastic optimal control problems through the solution of the corresponding extended FBSDE system. We show that the key to its success and numerical advantage is the fact that it tracks the gradient of the value function and an adjusted Hessian backwards in time. The additional information is then exploited for the optimization

    Essays in Robust and Data-Driven Risk Management

    Get PDF
    Risk defined as the chance that the outcome of an uncertain event is different than expected. In practice, the risk reveals itself in different ways in various applications such as unexpected stock movements in the area of portfolio management and unforeseen demand in the field of new product development. In this dissertation, we present four essays on data-driven risk management to address the uncertainty in portfolio management and capacity expansion problems via stochastic and robust optimization techniques.The third chapter of the dissertation (Portfolio Management with Quantile Constraints) introduces an iterative, data-driven approximation to a problem where the investor seeks to maximize the expected return of his/her portfolio subject to a quantile constraint, given historical realizations of the stock returns. Our approach involves solving a series of linear programming problems (thus) quickly solves the large scale problems. We compare its performance to that of methods commonly used in finance literature, such as fitting a Gaussian distribution to the returns. We also analyze the resulting efficient frontier and extend our approach to the case where portfolio risk is measured by the inter-quartile range of its return. Furthermore, we extend our modeling framework so that the solution calculates the corresponding conditional value at risk CVaR) value for the given quantile level.The fourth chapter (Portfolio Management with Moment Matching Approach) focuses on the problem where a manager, given a set of stocks to invest in, aims to minimize the probability of his/her portfolio return falling below a threshold while keeping the expected portfolio returnno worse than a target, when the stock returns are assumed to be Log-Normally distributed. This assumption, common in finance literature, creates computational difficulties. Because the portfolio return itself is difficult to estimate precisely. We thus approximate the portfolio re-turn distribution with a single Log-Normal random variable by the Fenton-Wilkinson method and investigate an iterative, data-driven approximation to the problem. We propose a two-stage solution approach, where the first stage requires solving a classic mean-variance optimization model, and the second step involves solving an unconstrained nonlinear problem with a smooth objective function. We test the performance of this approximation method and suggest an iterative calibration method to improve its accuracy. In addition, we compare the performance of the proposed method to that obtained by approximating the tail empirical distribution function to a Generalized Pareto Distribution, and extend our results to the design of basket options.The fifth chapter (New Product Launching Decisions with Robust Optimization) addresses the uncertainty that an innovative firm faces when a set of innovative products are planned to be launched a national market by help of a partner company for each innovative product. Theinnovative company investigates the optimal period to launch each product in the presence of the demand and partner offer response function uncertainties. The demand for the new product is modeled with the Bass Diffusion Model and the partner companies\u27 offer response functions are modeled with the logit choice model. The uncertainty on the parameters of the Bass Diffusion Model and the logic choice model are handled by robust optimization. We provide a tractable robust optimization framework to the problem which includes integer variables. In addition, weprovide an extension of the proposed approach where the innovative company has an option to reduce the size of the contract signed by the innovative firm and the partner firm for each product.In the sixth chapter (Log-Robust Portfolio Management with Factor Model), we investigate robust optimization models that address uncertainty for asset pricing and portfolio management. We use factor model to predict asset returns and treat randomness by a budget of uncertainty. We obtain a tractable robust model to maximize the wealth and gain theoretical insights into the optimal investment strategies

    Sequential Machine learning Approaches for Portfolio Management

    Get PDF
    Cette thรจse envisage un ensemble de mรฉthodes permettant aux algorithmes d'apprentissage statistique de mieux traiter la nature sรฉquentielle des problรจmes de gestion de portefeuilles financiers. Nous dรฉbutons par une considรฉration du problรจme gรฉnรฉral de la composition d'algorithmes d'apprentissage devant gรฉrer des tรขches sรฉquentielles, en particulier celui de la mise-ร -jour efficace des ensembles d'apprentissage dans un cadre de validation sรฉquentielle. Nous รฉnumรฉrons les desiderata que des primitives de composition doivent satisfaire, et faisons ressortir la difficultรฉ de les atteindre de faรงon rigoureuse et efficace. Nous poursuivons en prรฉsentant un ensemble d'algorithmes qui atteignent ces objectifs et prรฉsentons une รฉtude de cas d'un systรจme complexe de prise de dรฉcision financiรจre utilisant ces techniques. Nous dรฉcrivons ensuite une mรฉthode gรฉnรฉrale permettant de transformer un problรจme de dรฉcision sรฉquentielle non-Markovien en un problรจme d'apprentissage supervisรฉ en employant un algorithme de recherche basรฉ sur les K meilleurs chemins. Nous traitons d'une application en gestion de portefeuille oรน nous entraรฎnons un algorithme d'apprentissage ร  optimiser directement un ratio de Sharpe (ou autre critรจre non-additif incorporant une aversion au risque). Nous illustrons l'approche par une รฉtude expรฉrimentale approfondie, proposant une architecture de rรฉseaux de neurones spรฉcialisรฉe ร  la gestion de portefeuille et la comparant ร  plusieurs alternatives. Finalement, nous introduisons une reprรฉsentation fonctionnelle de sรฉries chronologiques permettant ร  des prรฉvisions d'รชtre effectuรฉes sur un horizon variable, tout en utilisant un ensemble informationnel rรฉvรฉlรฉ de maniรจre progressive. L'approche est basรฉe sur l'utilisation des processus Gaussiens, lesquels fournissent une matrice de covariance complรจte entre tous les points pour lesquels une prรฉvision est demandรฉe. Cette information est utilisรฉe ร  bon escient par un algorithme qui transige activement des รฉcarts de cours (price spreads) entre des contrats ร  terme sur commoditรฉs. L'approche proposรฉe produit, hors รฉchantillon, un rendement ajustรฉ pour le risque significatif, aprรจs frais de transactions, sur un portefeuille de 30 actifs.This thesis considers a number of approaches to make machine learning algorithms better suited to the sequential nature of financial portfolio management tasks. We start by considering the problem of the general composition of learning algorithms that must handle temporal learning tasks, in particular that of creating and efficiently updating the training sets in a sequential simulation framework. We enumerate the desiderata that composition primitives should satisfy, and underscore the difficulty of rigorously and efficiently reaching them. We follow by introducing a set of algorithms that accomplish the desired objectives, presenting a case-study of a real-world complex learning system for financial decision-making that uses those techniques. We then describe a general method to transform a non-Markovian sequential decision problem into a supervised learning problem using a K-best paths search algorithm. We consider an application in financial portfolio management where we train a learning algorithm to directly optimize a Sharpe Ratio (or other risk-averse non-additive) utility function. We illustrate the approach by demonstrating extensive experimental results using a neural network architecture specialized for portfolio management and compare against well-known alternatives. Finally, we introduce a functional representation of time series which allows forecasts to be performed over an unspecified horizon with progressively-revealed information sets. By virtue of using Gaussian processes, a complete covariance matrix between forecasts at several time-steps is available. This information is put to use in an application to actively trade price spreads between commodity futures contracts. The approach delivers impressive out-of-sample risk-adjusted returns after transaction costs on a portfolio of 30 spreads
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore